08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nicaea (325 AD), which asserted, against Arianism, that Jesus was of <strong>the</strong> samenature as God: he was not a created being as Arianism held.Constantinople (381 AD), which asserted, against Macedonianism, that <strong>the</strong>Holy Spirit was one in <strong>the</strong> Godhead. It countered Apollinarianism, which didaway with <strong>the</strong> real humanity of Christ, and it reaffirmed <strong>the</strong> Council of Nicaea’sposition on <strong>the</strong> Person of Christ.Ephesus (431 AD), which denied <strong>the</strong> Nestorian teaching of <strong>the</strong>re being twoseparate persons, human and divine, in Christ. It also dealt with Pelagianism,which gave man <strong>the</strong> ability to save himself and saw sin as acts of men ra<strong>the</strong>rthan an inborn tendency to do wrong.Chalcedon (451 AD), which reasserted that Christ has two natures completelyin harmony within <strong>the</strong> one Person. Both Nestorianism and Monophysitismcontinued to undermine <strong>the</strong> unity of doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Church for many years. Itis only in very recent years that reconciliations have been possible,Nestorianism all but dying out, and <strong>the</strong> present Monophysite churches in <strong>the</strong>East coming to be accepted as <strong>Christian</strong> churches.Out of this period of <strong>the</strong> 4 th and 5 th Centuries came <strong>the</strong> Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD) which is accepted by all <strong>the</strong> main <strong>Christian</strong>traditions today, Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Protestant. <strong>The</strong> OrthodoxChurches take exception to <strong>the</strong> inclusion of <strong>the</strong> filioque (‘and from <strong>the</strong> Son’)phrase in this Creed, 17 which states that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit proceeds from <strong>the</strong>Fa<strong>the</strong>r and from <strong>the</strong> Son. To <strong>the</strong> West filioque safeguarded <strong>the</strong> full Deity of <strong>the</strong>Son; to <strong>the</strong> East it did not safeguard <strong>the</strong> distinctiveness of <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. Todayexploration of <strong>the</strong> clause is bringing <strong>the</strong> two sides nearer toge<strong>the</strong>r.In relation to <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Unity</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 21 st Century, how should we regard <strong>the</strong>sedebates over doctrine in <strong>the</strong> early days of <strong>the</strong> Church? Have <strong>the</strong>y any relevanceto us today?THE RELEVANCE OF THESE ISSUES TO THE CHURCH TODAY<strong>The</strong> first thing to say is that any attempt to describe what God has done forman in <strong>the</strong> Incarnation is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of language to deal with17 See Ch 2.Page 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!