08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Most <strong>Christian</strong>s, in all three traditions, share this ‘classic’ way of interpretingScripture, and believe that God is speaking through <strong>the</strong> Biblical revelationtoday.Origen, John of Damascus, Anselm, Lu<strong>the</strong>r, Wesley all thought of ‘God’ indifferent ways, and <strong>the</strong>re are as many ways of understanding Christ as <strong>the</strong>reare believers in him, but that is not to say <strong>the</strong>se ways are necessarily alien toeach o<strong>the</strong>r.<strong>The</strong> traditional ways of interpreting Scripture, which take seriously <strong>the</strong>existence of <strong>the</strong> supernatural, can be, and in fact are, a uniting factor for<strong>Christian</strong>s. It is quite extraordinary what breadth <strong>the</strong>re is for interpretationwithin <strong>the</strong> constraints of such a ‘classic hermeneutic’.Vincent de Lérins spoke of a ‘progress’ in <strong>the</strong> faith, but not of change. <strong>The</strong>recan be progress in hermeneutics without changing <strong>the</strong> classical way ofinterpreting <strong>the</strong> Scriptures. For example, <strong>the</strong> term ‘homoousios’ is adevelopment in interpreting those scriptures which relate to <strong>the</strong> relationshipof Fa<strong>the</strong>r and Son in <strong>the</strong> Godhead, but it is not an overturning of <strong>the</strong> truth of<strong>the</strong> intrinsic deity of <strong>the</strong> Son.Philip Edgcumbe Hughes writes:‘...<strong>the</strong> Bible is for everyone. It is not <strong>the</strong> preserve of <strong>the</strong> specialist. To allowit to become <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong> of <strong>the</strong> expert, on whose pronouncements <strong>the</strong>average person is dependent, is an abuse and inversion that can only leadto disastrous results. <strong>The</strong> effect is to take <strong>the</strong> Bible out of <strong>the</strong> hands ofthose for whom it is intended, that is <strong>the</strong> totality of mankind.’ 191It is remarkable how <strong>the</strong> classical ‘realist’ interpretation of Scripture seems towork. It produces faith, love, hope and unity.For a short time I taught men and women in Indian Colleges who were workingamong tribal groups. <strong>The</strong> backgrounds of <strong>the</strong> students and <strong>the</strong> people <strong>the</strong>yministered to and my own were very different from each o<strong>the</strong>r. Yet we werebound by a common love of <strong>the</strong> Scriptures and understood each o<strong>the</strong>r’scomprehension of <strong>the</strong>m. This is a particularly valuable contribution <strong>the</strong> ‘classic’approach can make to <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Unity</strong>.191Hughes, Philip Edgcumbe, essay: <strong>The</strong> Truth of Scripture and <strong>the</strong> problem of historicalrelativity in Scripture and Truth, ed Carson, D A, and Woodbridge, John D, IVP 1986, p 176.Page 204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!