Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ArianismArianism was <strong>the</strong> most important and persistent heresy which came to a headin <strong>the</strong> early 4 th Century. In Alexandria, Egypt, an ancient city of learning andGreek culture, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> Church had become well established. It upheld ahigh view of <strong>the</strong> full deity of Christ. But a presbyter of <strong>the</strong> city, Arius, taughto<strong>the</strong>rwise. Jesus could not be equated with deity and though he could becalled both Son of God and logos (John 1.1), he was a created being and noteternal with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, not sharing his deity. Arius probably taught that <strong>the</strong>rewas a time when <strong>the</strong> Son ‘was not’.His views were refuted by many, especially a champion of orthodoxy,Athanasius (c.296-373 AD). Arius’s views were condemned at <strong>the</strong> Council ofNicaea (325 AD), called by Emperor Constantine, who suggested that <strong>the</strong> term‘homoousios’ (of <strong>the</strong> same substance) should be applied to Christ’s relationshipwith <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong> term was embraced by <strong>the</strong> Council and became, forsubsequent Councils and Creeds of <strong>the</strong> Church, <strong>the</strong> classic way of defining <strong>the</strong>relationship of Fa<strong>the</strong>r and Son.<strong>The</strong> fortunes of <strong>the</strong> Arian party in <strong>the</strong> Church were to fluctuate during <strong>the</strong> nextcenturies, sometimes seeming to become <strong>the</strong> new orthodoxy, but eventuallyrelegated to <strong>the</strong> role of a minor but persistent heresy, surfacing from time totime in history, even into <strong>the</strong> 20 th Century. If Arianism had won <strong>the</strong> day, nodoctrines of incarnation and atonement would have remained in <strong>the</strong> Church.Athanasius in On <strong>the</strong> Incarnation (c.318 AD) pointed out clearly that those twotruths were inextricably linked toge<strong>the</strong>r.Macedonianism<strong>The</strong> doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Person of <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit also came under attack. <strong>The</strong> earlyApostles’ Creed has little to say about <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, simply asserting, ‘Ibelieve in <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit’. <strong>The</strong> later Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD)says more:‘I believe in <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost, <strong>the</strong> Lord, <strong>the</strong> giver of life, who proceedethfrom <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Son; who with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Son toge<strong>the</strong>r isworshipped and glorified. Who spake by <strong>the</strong> prophets.’ (Book of CommonPrayer)Page 28