08.08.2015 Views

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

Christian Unity (the book) - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ArianismArianism was <strong>the</strong> most important and persistent heresy which came to a headin <strong>the</strong> early 4 th Century. In Alexandria, Egypt, an ancient city of learning andGreek culture, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> Church had become well established. It upheld ahigh view of <strong>the</strong> full deity of Christ. But a presbyter of <strong>the</strong> city, Arius, taughto<strong>the</strong>rwise. Jesus could not be equated with deity and though he could becalled both Son of God and logos (John 1.1), he was a created being and noteternal with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, not sharing his deity. Arius probably taught that <strong>the</strong>rewas a time when <strong>the</strong> Son ‘was not’.His views were refuted by many, especially a champion of orthodoxy,Athanasius (c.296-373 AD). Arius’s views were condemned at <strong>the</strong> Council ofNicaea (325 AD), called by Emperor Constantine, who suggested that <strong>the</strong> term‘homoousios’ (of <strong>the</strong> same substance) should be applied to Christ’s relationshipwith <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong> term was embraced by <strong>the</strong> Council and became, forsubsequent Councils and Creeds of <strong>the</strong> Church, <strong>the</strong> classic way of defining <strong>the</strong>relationship of Fa<strong>the</strong>r and Son.<strong>The</strong> fortunes of <strong>the</strong> Arian party in <strong>the</strong> Church were to fluctuate during <strong>the</strong> nextcenturies, sometimes seeming to become <strong>the</strong> new orthodoxy, but eventuallyrelegated to <strong>the</strong> role of a minor but persistent heresy, surfacing from time totime in history, even into <strong>the</strong> 20 th Century. If Arianism had won <strong>the</strong> day, nodoctrines of incarnation and atonement would have remained in <strong>the</strong> Church.Athanasius in On <strong>the</strong> Incarnation (c.318 AD) pointed out clearly that those twotruths were inextricably linked toge<strong>the</strong>r.Macedonianism<strong>The</strong> doctrine of <strong>the</strong> Person of <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit also came under attack. <strong>The</strong> earlyApostles’ Creed has little to say about <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, simply asserting, ‘Ibelieve in <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit’. <strong>The</strong> later Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 AD)says more:‘I believe in <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost, <strong>the</strong> Lord, <strong>the</strong> giver of life, who proceedethfrom <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Son; who with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> Son toge<strong>the</strong>r isworshipped and glorified. Who spake by <strong>the</strong> prophets.’ (Book of CommonPrayer)Page 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!