07.12.2012 Views

Shareholders' Letter

Shareholders' Letter

Shareholders' Letter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tax risks Fastweb<br />

On 23 February 2010, the Italian investigatory authorities, based upon an inquiry report concerning<br />

VAT fraud and criminal organisation, initiated penal proceedings against Fastweb and other<br />

individuals and companies. In addition, tax audits by the Italian Tax Police took place in respect of<br />

the years 2003 through 2009. The object of the investigations was, inter alia, the purchase and<br />

resale of telephone cards by Fastweb in 2003 as well as interconnection services of Fastweb in<br />

2005 through the beginning of 2007. The outcome of the investigation is difficult to predict and<br />

involves uncertainties. On the basis of a legal opinion, Swisscom estimates that an outflow of<br />

funds for the aggrieved Fastweb is probable and has therefore set up a provision of EUR 70 million<br />

(CHF 102 million) in the first quarter of 2010. The establishment of the provision, however, does<br />

not constitute a recognition of guilt. The amount of the provision was arrived at on the basis of a<br />

computation which takes into account the possible financial risks and uncertainties arising from<br />

the proceedings and was the best estimate which could be made on the basis of the information<br />

then available. In the fourth quarter of 2010, an accord was reached with the public prosecutor’s<br />

office for part of the VAT proceedings and provisions in an amount of EUR 46 million (CHF 61 million)<br />

were settled. As of 31 December 2010, the provisions relating to the VAT proceedings<br />

amounted to EUR 28 million (CHF 35 million).<br />

The further development of the proceedings or a decision of the competent authorities in subsequent<br />

years may lead to a differing assessment of the financial outcome and thus to an increase<br />

or decrease of the recorded provision. Furthermore, it is possible that, as a result of the tax audit,<br />

further matters may be contested by the tax authorities which are unrelated to the alleged VAT<br />

fraud and which could have a financial impact on income taxes and value-added taxes.<br />

29 Contingent liabilities<br />

Proceedings conducted by the Competition Commission<br />

The Competition Commission (ComCo) is currently investigating a number of companies in the<br />

Swisscom Group which are described below. If it is proven that Swisscom has violated Antitrust<br />

Law, ComCo is entitled to impose sanctions. The latter depends on the length and severity and<br />

nature of the violation and may amount to up to 10% of the revenue generated by the company<br />

in question in the relevant markets in Switzerland over the last three financial years.<br />

Investigation concerning mobile phone termination fees<br />

In October 2002, the Competition Commission (ComCo) initiated an investigation in accordance<br />

with Antitrust Law against Swisscom in connection with termination fees in the mobile phone<br />

market. In several proposed rulings issued to Swisscom, the Secretariat of ComCo was of the opinion<br />

that Swisscom has a dominant market position for the termination of mobile phone traffic in<br />

its network and has violated Swiss Antitrust Law by demanding disproportionately high termination<br />

fees compared with its competitors. It has therefore proposed to the Competition Commission<br />

that sanctions of CHF 489 million be imposed on Swisscom. The proposed sanctions relate to the<br />

period from 1 April 2004 (date on which the revised Swiss Antitrust Law entered into effect)<br />

through 31 May 2005 (when Swisscom lowered its mobile termination prices from CHF 0.335 to<br />

CHF 0.20). Swisscom contests the view that it holds a dominant market position and is of the opinion<br />

that its tariffs are not abusive. Prior to lowering its termination fees on 1 June 2005, Swisscom’s<br />

fees were approximately 10% lower than those charged by its competitors. In addition, as<br />

Swisscom has a higher volume of outgoing calls than the other mobile phone providers, Swisscom<br />

makes net payments to its competitors.<br />

On 5 February 2007, ComCo issued a ruling. It came to the conclusion that Swisscom is dominant<br />

in the market and has abused this position in violation of Swiss Antitrust Law by demanding unreasonably<br />

high termination fees from other mobile phone providers and particularly end consumers<br />

during the period from 1 April 2004 to 31 May 2005. The reasoning was in essence identical to<br />

that of the previous proposed rulings of the Secretariat. As a result of this allegedly unlawful behaviour,<br />

ComCo has imposed a sanction of CHF 333 million. The development in prices subsequent<br />

to 1 June 2005 is the object of a further investigation. In connection with the repurchase of the<br />

25%-share in Swisscom Mobile Ltd from Vodafone, it was agreed that, in the event of a sanction,<br />

25% of the sanction may be claimed back from Vodafone. Swisscom refutes the accusation that<br />

it has abused its dominant market position as well as the sanction and has challenged the ruling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!