sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

1969 a new initial project for the gallery extension with bridging to the historical Water Barracks building on the Danube waterfront was approved. Architect Dedeček worked on the summary of the project solution and implementation project for the premises of the SNG in Bratislava (construction was to take place until the end of the 1970s). The responsible project architects were Peter Mazanec, Mária Oravcová and Ján Piekert. The interior architect was Jaroslav Nemec. 1975 Vladimír Dedeček published the article: “Nová tvár Slovenskej národnej galérie” (The New Face of the Slovak National Gallery). 11 1977 Dr. Martin Kusý and Genovéva Grácová wrote about the SNG extension 12 in the magazine Slovensko on the occasion of the completion of some parts of the building. The new director of the SNG Štefan Mruškovič commented on the extension 13 in the magazines Výtvarný život and Vlastivedný časopis. Another issue of Výtvarný život contained contributions from the dismissed director, art historian Karol Vaculík 14 and art historian L’udmila Peterajová. 15 1978 Igor Thurzo reviewed the SNG extension for the Československý Architekt magazine. 16 Professor Ladislav Beisetzer wrote about the extension to the Slovak National Gallery in his article subtitled “Dielo a verejnost’” (Work and the Public) in the magazine Projekt: “On the extension of the Slovak National Gallery; in brief we could say it expresses the current level of the metal industry. We rather expected the author's intent to express and demonstrate the craftsmanship of a nation that has been 98
dealing artistically with materials since time immemorial. The strength of this composition is the activation of the view of the old building’s arches towards the waterfront promenade. (...) The author’s architectural intent may be accepted, accepted with objections or not accepted by the recipient. (...) We must count on the fact that there are works of architectural creation too, the same as in art that as such, lead to new invasions. The public accepts these with difficulty at the time when they are produced, or even criticize them. As long as such work is based on the elaborated theory of architecture and it conforms to it and stays programmecompliant, it follows the development trends and becomes style-constitutional; it is beneficial for art because it stimulates the further deepening of innovation. (...) Thus, the awareness that art cannot be imposed on people; that art can be accepted or not accepted by the public at its level, is yet more 10 Vladimír Dedeček. Areál Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave. Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 23, 1981, No. 1–2, p. 9. “Ing. Marcinka objected against the dominant solution of the administrative building that is inconsistent with the exhibition premises’ main function and its architectural form.” In: DEDEČEK, Vladimír. Technická správa k alternatívnemu riešeniu ÚP SNG, typewritten copy. Bratislava 11 June 1967, p. 1. Fond Vladimír Dedeček, Zbierka architektúry, dizajnu a úžitkového umenia SNG. 11 DEDEČEK, Vladimír. Nová tvár Slovenskej národnej galérie. Technické noviny, 8 April 1975, No. 14, p. 5. 12 KUSÝ, Martin – GRÁCOVÁ, Genovéva. Slovenská národná galéria. Slovensko, 1, 1977, No. 3, p. 4–5. 13 See MRUŠKOVIČ, Štefan. Expozície Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave znovuotvorené. Vlastivedný časopis, 26, 1977, No. 3, pp. 97–101 and idem. Pred novou etapou Slovenskej národnej galérie. Výtvarný život, 22, 1977, No. 7, pp. 11–12. Two years later he also published the anniversary text: MRUŠKOVIČ, Štefan. Slovenská národná galéria tridsat’ročná. Vlastivedný časopis, 28, 1979, No. 2, pp. 74–76. 14 VACULÍK, Karol. Nové priestory a expozície Slovenskej národnej galérie. Výtvarný život, 22, 1977, No. 7, pp. 12–19. 15 PETERAJOVÁ, L’udmila. Slovenská národná galéria po dvadsiatich rokoch. Výtvarný život, 22, 1977, No. 7, pp. 20–23. 16 THURZO, Igor. Budova Slovenskej národnej galérie a jej história. Československý architekt, 24, 1978, No. 7, pp. 4–5. A piece of information on SNG was also published one year later: ČAPKA, B.[?] Slovenská národní galérie v Bratislavě. Československý architekt, 25, 1979, No. 7, p. 8. 99
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51: [9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53: [18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55: [26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57: 03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59: The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61: was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63: The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65: Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?