sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

1987 journal Výtvarný život published an article by L’ubomír Podušel called Slovenská národná galéria o budúcnosti (The Slovak National Gallery about the future) 29 . 1988 the former director of the SNG Dr. Karol Vaculík published a catalogue/publication 30 dedicated to the history of the gallery on its 40th anniversary. An article on the construction of this institution was also published by an actual director Dr. Mruškovič in Výtvarný život 31 . 1990 in his article “Hriechy architektúry” (The Sins of Architecture), Professor Štefan Šlachta, architect, historian, (after 1989) post-revolution Dean of The Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Bratislava and politician, commented on Dedeček’s Archive and the Supreme Court buildings in Bratislava as well as on the question of context or lack of context of Dedeček's extension of the SNG: “One of the dominant architectural sins is the Slovak National Gallery – more precisely the extended part of the old Water Barracks. (...) The aggressiveness of the mass of the gallery towards the neighbouring objects is the first characteristic mistake of the author's concept. (...) The misunderstanding of the “genius loci” is most distinctively documented by the solution of the gallery courtyard. More precisely the former courtyard that used to be here but ‘left’ with the new solution. (...) Although the filled and elevated area of the court has created space to exhibit sculptures, it has destroyed the possibility of their cultural perception and feeling.” 32 1991 Slovak magazine Projekt published a review of mentioned Dedeček’s building of the Supreme court of Slovak Socialist Republic in Bratislava. The authors of the review, architects 104
Bohuslav Kraus and Ján Kodoň, also assessed this building in the context of the gallery extension: “the construction [of the court], a huge toothy colossus, has immediately controlled the whole space and has imposed its characteristic image upon it, which has been well known since the time of the construction of the Slovak National Gallery on the Danube waterfront”. 33 1999 an article by L’ubomír Podušel was published on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the SNG 34 . 2000 in the book Dejiny Slovenského výtvarného umenia. 20. storočie (History of Slovak Fine Arts in the 20 th Century), edited by Zora Rusinová historian Matúš Dulla dedicated one sentence to Dedeček's SNG extension and in fact to all of his works: “The courageous shaping (although with a number of constructional imperfections) of the extension of the SNG in Bratislava by Vladimír Dedeček (1969–1979) has caught contradictory notice”. 35 2001 a public panel discussion was held on 21 st March in the closed bridging – the exhibition space of the SNG 29 PODUŠEL, L’ubomír. Slovenská národná galéria o budúcnosti. Výtvarný život, 32, 1987, No. 3, pp. 23–24. 30 VACULÍK, Karol: Slovenská národná galéria v slovenskej kultúre. Bratislava: SNG, Tatran, 1988, p. 70. 31 MRUŠKOVIČ, Štefan. Štyridsat’ rokov Slovenskej národnej galérie. Výtvarný život, 33, 1988, No. 6, pp. 1–2. 32 ŠLACHTA, Štefan. Hriechy architektúry. Príroda a spoločnost’, 39, 1990, No. 20, p. 18. 33 KRAUS, Bohuslav – KODOŇ, Ján. Budova Najvyššieho súdu Slovenskej republiky v Bratislave. Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 33, 1991, No. 7–8, pp. 47–49, p. 47. 34 PODUŠEL, L’ubomír. Slovenská národná galéria pät’desiatročná. Pamiatky a múzeá, 48, 1999, No. 1, pp. 28–32. 35 DULLA, Matúš. Architektúra od moderny k sorele a spät’ 1950– 1970. In: RUSINOVÁ, Zora (ed.). Dejiny slovenského výtvarného umenia. 20. storočie. Bratislava: SNG, 2000, p. 227. 1<strong>05</strong>
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57: 03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59: The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61: was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63: The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65: Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?