sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

Selected works of Vladimír Dedeček are published in this context together with the works of Belluš, Chorvát, Kusý, Svetlík, Kroha and the group, Kuzma, Svetko, Matušík, Chovanec, Mlynárčik with Mecková and Kupkovič within the performance of two international research tasks: a project called Architecture of totalitarian regimes of the 20 th century in city management in Southern and Eastern Europe and a project called Differentiated typology of modernism: a theoretical basis for the maintenance and renewal of modern architectural works in Slovakia. The author of the introduction justified their unification in one book by the controversy of the conservative and the modern (it means neither the classical and the modern, nor the conservative and the progressive) in 20 th century architecture in Slovakia. in a review of this book, Jan Tabor pointed out the importance of research as well as the problems concerning the terms and concepts used: “We could keep arguing about the term totalitarian forever. This attribute is pejorative in a totalitarian way and tempts us into a mistaken view that the state or official architecture of any state that has been assigned with this ideologically motivated attribute is necessarily totalitarian too. (...) It is usually also unfair to the architects who were designing and building, and making mistakes in the conditions in which they had to live, which, however, they mostly rejected, very often with their own high quality architecture.” 73 Tabor's review highlights that 20 th and 21 st century architecture that is officially supported by dictatorships, centralized governments and political groups that (not even today) tolerate no opposition, does not always have to be as defined, i.e. totalitarian from the nature of the power of the state. The architectural differentiation in undemocratic systems can be jointly formed – and in some works they are provably jointly formed – by polemic, subversive and critical procedures of creation that can be distinguished and are different from those that are being nodded over by the established state power regime. 124
architect Paňák's article on the reconstruction of the SNG building was published in Architektúra a urbanizmus magazine 74 . 2015 23 rd – 27 th March, the Faculty of Architecture SUT in Bratislava and the Department of Architecture of Residential Buildings under the leadership of the architect Štefan Polakovič co-organized an international architectural workshop called Zhorela SNG v Bratislave – ako d’alej? (SNG in Bratislava has burned down – what shall we do now?). Students of architecture from Paris, Venice, Stuttgart and Bratislava schools also considered the future of the Slovak Radio building by Štefan Svetko and the Most SNP bridge in Bratislava by the architectural group of the architect Jozef Lacko. 2016 on 18 th January the reconstruction of the SNG buildings in Bratislava began. The studios of the Department of Architecture of AFAD and the Faculty of Architecture of SUT started to work on the theme of “iconic ruins” and, within that framework, also on alternative designs for reconstruction, renewal and rebuilding projects for the SNG. an exhibition project was launched for the 15 th International Architecture Exhibition in Venice on 26 th February, the newspaper Denník N published an article 75 by Jana Németh about the project for the 15th International Architecture Exhibition in Venice along with an interview with its co-author and curator Professor Marián Zervan. 73 TABOR, Jan. Dilema dějin slovenské moderny: skvělé stavby ze zlých časů. Arch, 18, 2013, No. 12, pp. 64–65. 74 PAŇÁK, Pavol. Rekonštrukcia a dostavba areálu Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave. Architektúra a urbanizmus, 47, 2013, No. 3–4, pp. 266–279. 75 NÉMETH, Jana. Kto by sa pobil o Slovenskú národnú galériu. Denník N, 26 February 2016, pp. 22–23. 125
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57:
03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59:
The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61:
was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63:
The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65:
Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67:
locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69:
03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71:
[d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73:
[d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75:
[d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?