sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

[is] a need to build any more so called replicas in Bratislava.” 46 According to the readers' survey, there were 425 respondents to the question, published on the web site of this journal before the issue was published: “Should the extension of the SNG be torn down or not?”. Respondents' votes: no = 7,5 %, yes = 92,5 % (the editorial staff informed the readers that attempts to vote repeatedly from one computer had been blocked). on 23 rd May an Opinion on the architecture of the extension of the Slovak National Gallery in Bratislava was established and published with the name Zachovat’ znamená tvorit’ (To maintain means to create). 47 Winners of the Emil Belluš Prize, representatives of the Slovak Architects Society and the Slovak Chamber of Architects, SUT and AFAD architects-pedagogues and other persons supported the preservation of the SNG bridging: “We openly say that the alternative ‘tearing it down’ is unacceptable to us. (…)” 48 The signatories in the order in which they appear beneath the statement: Tibor Alexy, Andrej Alexy, Ján Bahna, Michal Bogár, Ivan Gürtler, Karol Chudomelka, Rastislav Janák, L’ubomír Králik, Martin Kusý, Dušan Kuzma, Ivan Matušík, Ferdinand Milučký, Pavel Paňák, Štefan Svetko, Branislav Somora, Robert Špaček, Imrich (Imro) Vaško, L’ubomír Závodný, Peter Žalman, Miloslav Mudrončík, Boris Hrbáň, Jozef Šoltés, Ladislav Kmet’, Dušan Čupka, Marta Ščepková, Dušan Bók, Igor Teplan and Jozef Chrobák. 2002 in the chapter “Moderna značne neskorá” (Modern style significantly late) the history book: Architektúra Slovenska v 20. storočí 48 (Slovak Architecture in the 20 th century ) by Dulla and Moravčíková returns to the question of pre-revolution (before 1989) monuments as courageous national colossi that became “empty” or more precisely were emptied during 1<strong>12</strong>
socialism: “Some kind of compensation for the historical shortage of national institutions was represented by big unique projects, monuments of national culture. In addition to the radio building in Bratislava, there emerged the Matica slovenská building in Martin, the Television Centre in Bratislava and the extension of the Slovak National Gallery. (...) The architect of the [SNG] complex Vladimír Dedeček embodied the spirit of the period with his spacious works that boldly and self-confidently repeated a <strong>single</strong> shape motif and are full of silent emptiness. On the site of the distant competitors of the University City, there are the shabby torsos of the Comenius University faculties and on the opposite side, a little down the river Danube, there is the torso of the new Incheba in the Bratislava trade fair and exhibition hall (...). None of the Slovak architects has found the sane courage to make an object from such colossal elements as, let's say, the bridge in the Incheba exhibition building that connects the skyscraper with the exhibition halls or to use layered broken lines in such a repeating fashion as those in the Bratislava dormitories (...) or in the Regional political school in Modra-Harmónia. (...) In Dedeček's work, as he said himself, ‘to a great extent the construction work’ directly affects ‘the quality of architecture’ [ Projekt, 1984, No. 2, p. 23–24 ]. There is no wonder that his buildings became the subject of sharp criticism after 1989. Their bold, abstract and empty beauty was disregarded and only the symbols of an overthrown regime could be seen in them”. 49 2003 From 10 March to 20 May, the first competition for the Reconstruction and Modernisation of the SNG building 46 Ibidem. 47 Zachovat’ znamená tvorit’. Stanovisko k architektúre objektu dostavby Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave (petition). Fórum architektúry, 24, 2001, No. 7–8, p. 11. 48 DULLA, Matúš – MORAVČÍKOVÁ, Henrieta. Architektúra Slovenska v 20. storočí. Bratislava: Slovart, 2002, p. 511. 49 Ibidem, pp. 226–227. 113
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57:
03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59:
The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61:
was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63:
The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65: Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?