sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Karol Vaculík consulted with the architect Štefan Svetko over the urban planning point of view on the construction extension of the demolished south wing of the historical Water Barracks (1759–1763) and, following his recommendations, he also consulted with Vladimír Dedeček on the architectural aspects. 5 1962 after discussions with the director of the SNG Dr. Vaculík, Vladimír Dedeček designed the initial study for the construction of the southern extension of Water Barracks, the Danube wing. 1963 the Slovak Architects Society announced the assignment of a study of the urban planning/architectural project for the completion of construction of the Slovak National Gallery in Bratislava. The task to complete the gallery was extended to complete the whole corner block. Four authors, or rather co-authors, submitted their designs: Martin Beňuška and Štefánia Rosincová; Vladimír Dedeček; Jaroslav Fragner with his team and Eugen Kramár with Ján Šprlák. According to assessment records, the jury which consisted of Alojz Dařiček, Ján Steller, L’ubomír Titl, Milan Škorupa and Karol Vaculík evaluated the studies in the following order: 1. Dedeček, 2. Kramár and Šprlák, 3. Fragner with his team, 4. Beňuška and Rosincová. 1964 on 6th January the expert committee of the Slovak Architects Society evaluated Dedeček’s design of the new SNG building as the winning project: “The evaluation committee, taking into account the overall assessment of the individual solutions’ architectural and social benefits, have put the design of Ing. Arch. Vladimír Dedeček in first place on account of the overall urban planning and 96
architectural solution as well as the operational solution for the difficult situation around the SNG and the significant adjacent areas where the author managed to provide a solution at a <strong>high</strong> architectural level.” 6 Work began on the initial project. Dr. Karol Vaculík dealt with the perspective of the extension of the SNG in the magazine Kultúrny život. 7 1967 Vladimír Dedeček finished the initial project for the Construction Completion and Extension of the SNG premises. The project was submitted to the expert committee 8 of the Ministry of Education and Culture. 9 Under the direction of Professor Belluš the committee drew up their opinion with objections. According to later comments from the architect, the committee described the project as “... conservative – there is seemingly no point in adapting the scale and shape of the extension to the surrounding and architecturally unimportant buildings”. 10 5 Monika Mitášová’s unpublished interview with Vladimír Dedeček in Bratislava, summer 2014 – summer 2015. 6 [Collective of authors.] Záverečné technicko-ekonomické vyhodnotenie stavby Rekonštrukcia a prístavba SNG, Bratislava 1979, p. 3. 7 VACULÍK, Karol. Už by mala byt’ (O perspektívach prístavby Slovenskej národnej galérie). Kultúrny život, 19, 1964, No. 19, p. 10. 8 The expert opinions were written by prof. Dr. Ing. Jozef Harvančík, Ing. arch. Marián Marcinka and one opinion had illegible signatures with no names. Within the expert committee, the design was commented by prof. Ing. arch. Emil Belluš, prof. Dr. Ing. Jozef Harvančík, Ing. arch. Štefan Svetko for the Bratislava Chief City Architect Office, prof. Ing. arch. Vladimír Karfík, Ing. arch. Anton Zimmermann [Cimmermann]. Ing. arch. Jozef Lacko apologized. See attachment to Dr. Karol Vaculík’s letter to arch. Vladimír Dedeček from 4 September 1967. Typewritten copy, p. 19. In: Fond Karol Vaculík, Visual Arts Archive of SNG. 9 Direction of SNC Committee for Education and Culture from 28 December 1962. The implementer was the Minister of Education and Culture RSDr. Vasil Bil’ak. See [Collective of authors.] Záverečné technicko-ekonomické vyhodnotenie dokončenej stavby, Rekonštrukcia a prístavba SNG. Bratislava 1979, p. 3. 10 / see p. 99 / 97
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49: [4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51: [9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53: [18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55: [26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57: 03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59: The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61: was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63: The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65: Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?