- Page 1 and 2: CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
- Page 3: 15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
- Page 8 and 9: 01. STATEMENT CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARC
- Page 10 and 11: The idea to build the SNG (Slovak N
- Page 12: Competitions on renovation, refurbi
- Page 15 and 16: study for addition of southern/danu
- Page 17 and 18: 1 Author’s dating: 1969-1978. In:
- Page 19 and 20: to be on the floor above (the site
- Page 21 and 22: uilding, currently housing the dire
- Page 23 and 24: Program and spatial solution The ge
- Page 25 and 26: Bratislava’s chief architect’s
- Page 27 and 28: Obchodná akadémia on Račianska).
- Page 29 and 30: gallery, a public space of multiple
- Page 31 and 32: the individual functional units (ex
- Page 33 and 34: arrangement into the riverfront, on
- Page 35 and 36: The second group of experts thus la
- Page 37 and 38: corniced at about 11 m (11.06 m), a
- Page 39 and 40: The atypical portions of the interi
- Page 41 and 42: In 1982, in an article summarizing
- Page 43 and 44: a pedestrian or viewer who looked a
- Page 45 and 46: Literature (01) VACULÍK, Karol. Sk
- Page 47 and 48: [3] [1] Vladimír Dedeček, Souther
- Page 49 and 50: [6] [7] [8] 46 | 47
- Page 51 and 52: [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
- Page 53 and 54: [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] 50 |
- Page 55 and 56: [28] [29] 52 | 53
- Page 57 and 58:
We resolved the exhibition spaces a
- Page 59 and 60:
These tendencies conditioned both t
- Page 61 and 62:
the stoa, peristyle or portico moti
- Page 63 and 64:
visual art in its outdoor spaces. T
- Page 65 and 66:
administration corridors with the W
- Page 67 and 68:
and flexible interconnection of arc
- Page 69 and 70:
[d—01] SNG edifice {red} in large
- Page 71 and 72:
[d—03] Unbuilt SNG edifices {red}
- Page 73 and 74:
[d—05] Clustering of routes {red
- Page 75 and 76:
[d—07] Research and administrativ
- Page 77 and 78:
[d—09] SNG interior “amphitheat
- Page 79 and 80:
E D [d—11] Next phase of front wi
- Page 81 and 82:
[d—13] Structure of bridging wing
- Page 83 and 84:
[d—15] Shifts in column structure
- Page 85 and 86:
[d—17] Entrance {1 st level } of
- Page 87 and 88:
[d—19] 3 rd level with paths of m
- Page 89 and 90:
[d—21] 5 th level with paths of m
- Page 91 and 92:
[d—23] 7 th level with paths of m
- Page 93 and 94:
[d—25] Perpendicular and longitud
- Page 95 and 96:
92 | 93
- Page 97 and 98:
1952 Vladimír Dedeček designed th
- Page 99 and 100:
architectural solution as well as t
- Page 101 and 102:
dealing artistically with materials
- Page 103 and 104:
area. 20 The monumentality of the b
- Page 105 and 106:
front “corner” of the courtyard
- Page 107 and 108:
Bohuslav Kraus and Ján Kodoň, als
- Page 109 and 110:
Lukačovič, Dedeček's peers Il’
- Page 111 and 112:
not only to reconstruct the whole o
- Page 113 and 114:
“Bratislava, unfortunately, has i
- Page 115 and 116:
socialism: “Some kind of compensa
- Page 117 and 118:
(Department of Architecture of AFAD
- Page 119 and 120:
construct big community buildings.
- Page 121 and 122:
20 th May - 21 st June, an exhibiti
- Page 123 and 124:
were the architects Benjamín Brád
- Page 125 and 126:
not characterised in more detail or
- Page 127 and 128:
architect Paňák's article on the
- Page 129 and 130:
that he had the chance to work on b
- Page 131 and 132:
Study model of the Slovak National
- Page 133 and 134:
there, leading political and cultur
- Page 135:
(NL Architects), Jan Tabor, Benjami
- Page 138 and 139:
06. PHOTOS OF THE SNG MODEL
- Page 141:
138 | 139
- Page 145 and 146:
142 | 143