sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

south Danube wing (closed due to it’s state of serious disrepair), dedicated to the possibility of the demolition, repair, reconstruction and modernisation of the SNG building. The discussion 36 was accompanied by an exhibition of documents regarding the historical Water Barracks building and the design documentation of the SNG premises by Vladimír Dedeček. Curator Alexandra Kusá. There were several calls for the construction of a new gallery building; the only difference in them was their aim to repair, reconstruct or demolish the SNG bridging. The “... possibility of removing the construction” was openly presented only by Professor Štefan Šlachta: “Personally, I would prefer to look for a way of having a new gallery, to seek a new solution, because this reconstruction would be very problematic and I am sure it would be twice as expensive as a new building. (...) Of course it is my personal opinion, but if each visit to the national gallery makes me feel frustrated, I think it is not a good national gallery.” 37 A similar viewpoint was indirectly presented by the architect Ján Bahna who designed the reconstruction of the Water Barracks building in the 1990s and had also been working on the whole premises with his students in his architectural studio in Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Bratislava. He questioned the structure's load capacity if there would be changes in the facing or an additional superstructure, which was immediately disproved by the objective arguments of the building's structure engineer Jindřich Trailin. The former Bratislava Chief City Architect Štefan Svetko also presented his critical view of SNG building (he had had a crucial role in the change of the front wing concept, which he did not hide). Svetko did not support the disassembly or demolition (“slum-clearance”) of the bridging. Interestingly objective supportive viewpoints were presented not only by both of the involved structure engineers Jindřich Trailin and Jiří Kozák but also by the co-founding director of former state architectural company Stavoprojekt Professor Štefan 106
Lukačovič, Dedeček's peers Il’ja Skoček, Ferdinand Milučký and architects from the younger generation, Martin Kusý, Ivan Gürtler, Branislav Somora and Boris Hrbáň. Architectural historian Henrieta Moravčíková and art historians L’uba Belohradská and Zuzana Bartošová did not support the possibility of demolition. The sculptor Jozef Jankovič had critical comments not only on the inadequate function of the gallery for contemporary art exhibitions but also on the relationship between the state and the national gallery – he requested the creation of a contemporary art museum, an art-industry museum and a contemporary art gallery – a kunsthalle. The whole discussion that criticized the current cultural and political situation then gave the impression of favouring the renewal of the front wing, criticizing the state's inability to construct buildings for new public cultural institutions and to care for the existing ones. The questions from the architect Jaroslav Kilián showed the context of Dedeček's project: “And so my question is: why should we tear down this particular gallery? Why not the Danube hotel or something else? (...) Bratislava started to develop the waterfront at the end of the last century. This process took place somewhere under the statue of Maria Theresa, then there was a break, then Belluš came to continue the process 36 Architects Martin Kusý as the president of Slovak Architects Society; Branislav Somora as the chairman of Slovak Chamber of Architects; Ján Bahna, Ivan Gürtler, Jaroslav Kilián, Ivan Matušík and architects-historians Henrieta Moravčíková and Štefan Šlachta accepted the invitation of art historian Katarína Bajcurová, the general director of the Slovak National Gallery, and architecture historian Dana Bořutová, member of SNG Science Council to take part in the discussion. The discussion participants also included architects Štefan Lukačovič, Štefan Svetko, Il’ja Skoček, Ferdinand Milučký, Jaroslav Liptay, Jozef Šoltés, sculptor Jozef Jankovič, art historians L’uba Belohradská, Zuzana Bartošová as well as structural engineers Jindřich Trailin and Jiří Kozák, former employees of Dedeček’s studio in the state architectural company Stavoprojekt. The discussion was moderated by art historian Dana Bořutová. Architect Vladimír Dedeček apologized for his absence in the panel discussion. 37 [Not signed.] Budúcnost’ premostenia – budúcnost’ SNG? Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 43, 2001, No. 2, p. 6. 107
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57:
03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59: The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61: was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63: The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65: Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?