sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

in Bratislava was announced. The jury comprised of Katarína Bajcurová, Andrej Petrek, Dušan Bálent, Gustav Peichl, Dana Bořutová, Milan Knížák, Emil Přikryl, Jan Tabor, Norbert Šmondrk (Emil Přikryl was elected chairman of the jury to replace the absent Gustav Peichel and he was replaced by Marek Chalupa). They awarded two first prizes ex aequo to the design of Juraj Koban and Štefan Pacák (studio KOPA) and to the design of Il’ja Skoček jr. – Matúš Vallo – Oliver Sádovský. The second prize was not awarded. The third prize was awarded to David Kopecký – Ján Studený – Martin Vojta – Oldřich Skyba. The competition results were not implemented and two years later the gallery management announced a new competition. the question of the competition for the reconstruction of the SNG and extension were again addressed in the press in the Projekt and Arch magazines. The director of the SNG, Dr. Katarína Bajcurová, and the architectural historian Dr. Henrieta Moravčíková commented on them. An interview with the chairman of the jury, the Austrian architect Gustav Peichl was also published. 50 2004 Dedeček's SNG building in Bratislava was opened to visitors as a part of Days of Architecture. On this occasion, the architect Peter Žalman published a text 51 based on interviews with Vladimír Dedeček. 20<strong>05</strong> on 7th April, following his lecture at the AFAD in Bratislava the Dutch architect Willem Jan Neutellings founded the symbolical Slovak Institute for the Preservation of Communist Monumental Architectural Heritage (SIPCMAH) (Slovenský inštitút ochrany pamiatok komunistickej monumentálnej architektúry (SIOPKMA)) together with architects Imro Vaško, Zoltán Holocsi, Benjamín Brádňanský and Vít Halada 114
(Department of Architecture of AFAD in Bratislava). The three “founding works” were: A) Slovak Radio building by Svetko's collective, B) Dedeček's SNG extension and C) Jurica – Kozák – Májek – Tomašák's Television transmitter in Bratislava on Kamzík Hill. on 23 rd May the procurement process for the design study for the reconstruction and modernisation of the SNG buildings in Bratislava was announced. The jury comprised of: Gustav Peichl (chairman), Peter Pelčák, Andrej Hrausky, Peter Vitko, Peter Moravčík, Katarína Bajcurová, Andrej Zmeček and Martin Mašek. They awarded the first prize to Martin Kusý and Pavol Paňák (Architekti BKPŠ, s. r. o. studio), the second prize to Eduard and Andrej Šutek (BKPŠ studio) and the third prize to Gabriel Drobniak – Gabriel Zajíček – Dušan Jurkovič – Matúš Ivanič. in an interview with Samuel Abrahám for the Kritika a kontext magazine, the Bratislava Chief City Architect Professor Štefan Šlachta returned to the question of socialist urban planning and the discussion on the relationship between architecture and totalitarian power: “I think the power was mainly manifested in the demolition of, let's say, parts of the Old Town but not only in Bratislava. The authorities tore 50 See: LICHVÁROVÁ, Mária. Rozhovor s profesorom Gustavom Peichlom. Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 45, 2003, No. 4, pp. 32–33. MIKLOŠ, Peter. S generálnou riaditel’kou SNG Katarínou Bajcurovou (rozhovor). Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 45, 2003, No. 4, pp. 26. MORAVČÍKOVÁ, Henrieta. Sút’až na rekonštrukciu a modernizáciu areálu Slovenskej národnej galérie. Arch, 8, 2003, No. 6, pp. 16. [Not signed.] Architektonická sút’až. Rekonštrukcia a modernizácia areálu SNG v Bratislave. Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 45, 2003, No. 4, pp. 14–55. [Not signed.] Sút’až na SNG a súvislosti. Arch, 8, 2003, No. 6, p. 40. Sút’ažné návrhy na rekonštrukciu a modernizáciu areálu Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave. Arch, 8, 2003, No. 6, p. 18–39. See also KUSÁ, Alexandra. K histórii problematiky Slovenskej národnej galérie. Arch, 8, 2003, No. 6, pp. 13–15. 51 ŽALMAN, Peter. Pohl’ad spät’. Dni architektúry 2004 pripomenuli aj tvorbu Vladimíra Dedečka. Projekt. Revue slovenskej architektúry, 46, 2004, No. 3, pp. 61–64. 115
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57:
03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59:
The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61:
was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63:
The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65:
Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67: locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69: 03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 120 and 121: totalitarian style haunting Europea
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?