22.05.2016 Views

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with its central square, to a field of checkerboard-like differentiated<br />

environments with a variety of levels and means of moving<br />

around (covered walkways, passages, loggias, stairways, ramps,<br />

raised pedestals/plinths, rooftop terraces, walkable roofs and<br />

so forth). Such urban links at diverse heights made it possible<br />

to perceive the art, the site and the city from varying elevations:<br />

it even afforded views of adjacent riverfront buildings, the river,<br />

the streets of the historical city core, and the growing city space<br />

on the other bank of the Danube.<br />

The purpose of a gallery site area so designed was both<br />

to provide for indoor exhibitions in the gallery’s own buildings,<br />

but to connect them to outdoor exhibitions “in among” buildings,<br />

on them and under them, in open passageways. Thus it<br />

was not just Dedeček’s buildings themselves that enabled and<br />

enclosed the exhibition space, but vice versa too: Dedeček’s<br />

urban exposition environment in public space turned the gallery<br />

into an indoor-outdoor art exhibit along the river. It could be said<br />

that the site stimulated the relationships between the outdoor<br />

modern sculpture exhibits and the plasticity of late modern<br />

architecture; it could also be said that the site as it was designed<br />

with consideration for exhibiting historical and modern<br />

sculpture right in the city, even anticipating exhibition of new<br />

types and genres of art: environments and installations in situ<br />

alongside series and accumulations of artworks. The summer<br />

amphitheatre brought in the cinematic art. So this was a comprehensive<br />

and innovative urbanist/architectural space, intended<br />

even for new audio-visual arts, accessible in a new urbanist/<br />

architectural situation. However, in the 1980s, after Dr. Vaculík<br />

was removed from the gallery’s leadership and the construction<br />

was completed, the spaces were not utilized as variably and<br />

innovatively as the site’s urban/architectural plan envisioned.<br />

Using the gallery area’s system of interior and exterior walkways,<br />

ramps and stairways, the public could walk from and to the riverfront<br />

to Štúrovo or Hviezdoslavovo námestie. A system of buildings<br />

thus designed, and their interstices, is an exquisitely urban<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!