sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Recommendations

Info

totalitarian style haunting European Union in crisis, but also as demonumentalized monuments in the mass of nameless conventional buildings of the recent past. In addition to the photographs of the Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra the book also includes three buildings in Bratislava by the architect Dedeček: The Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic, the Slovak National Gallery and the Slovak National Archive. 2008 Imro Vaško and Jan Tabor submitted the concept of an international exposition-confrontation called DEDEČEK to enter into the competition for the exhibition project followed by the subsequent implementation of an exposition in the pavilion of the Czech and Slovak Republics during the 11 th International Architecture Exhibition in Venice: “DEDEČEK is a kind of catalyst of concrete thinking and the interpretation of this era that could be called a selective negation of quality. Prominent personalities who we expect to attend: Elfriede Jelinek – writer, Ulrich Seidl – film maker, Friedrich Cerha – composer, Peter Sloterdijk – philosopher, Valie Export – visual artist.” 59 The project did not win. Architectural studio zerozero with co-working authors exhibited in the pavilion in this year's edition. Curatorial collaboration Monika Mitášová. 2009 February, the Institute of Construction and Architecture of the Slovak Academy of Sciences published the digital Register of Modern Architecture on the occasion of the completion of the exhibition Modern Architecture in the Indices of Architecture Department and of the colloquium Registration and protection of modern architecture. At that time it included 150 out of 3,000 selected works, later it was extended to contain the 500 “most valuable works” inclusive of areas and constructions by Vladimír Dedeček, including the SNG. 60 118
20 th May – 21 st June, an exhibition of works of the NL Architects studio represented an international reaction to the book Eastmodern and to the Bratislava discussion regarding the demolition, reconstruction or revitalisation of the front wing of the SNG. These Dutch architects chose to exhibit in the closed exhibition rooms of the SNG “bridging”. They preferred the exhibition spaces that were in a state of disrepair and “out of order” to the “reconstructed” historical Esterházy palace of the Slovak National Gallery. NL Architects publicly appealed by means of this exhibition and also in a press conference to save the Water Barracks “bridging” and supported the voices against its demolition. The invitation of this studio to Bratislava as a part of a Dutch culture festival “Made in Holland, Holland in Slovakia” was initiated by the photographer Illah van Oijen. Curatorial collabration Monika Mitášová. the genesis of Dedeček's project for the SNG was discussed in a text in the gallery yearbook published by the curator Monika Mitášová who also placed the architect's work in the context of 1980s architecture in Slovakia in the exhibition for that decade 61 . 10 th July, the Slovak National Gallery, the Department of Architecture of AFAD, the architectural studio of Benjamín Brádňanský and Víto Halada in cooperation with the Department of Photography of AFAD, the photography studio of Filip Vančo and in cooperation with the photographer 59 VAŠKO, Imro – TABOR, Jan: DEDEČEK. Koncept. Digitálny dokument, p. 1, authors' archive. 60 Ibidem. 61 MITÁŠOVÁ, Monika. K vzniku dostavby SNG. Štyri alternatívy návrhu Vladimíra Dedečka. In: POLÁČKOVÁ, Dagmar (ed.). Ročenka Slovenskej národnej galérie v Bratislave – Galéria 2007–2008., Bratislava : SNG, 2009, pp. 53–56; aedem. Drobné subverzie? Architektúra druhej polovice 80. a začiatku 90. rokov na Slovensku. In: JABLONSKÁ, Beata (ed.). Osemdesiate. Postmoderna v slovenskom výtvarnom umení 1985–1992 (katalóg výstavy). Bratislava: Slovenská národná galéria, 2009. 119
Page 1 and 2:
CARE (SORGE ) FOR ARCHITECTURE mari
Page 3:
15. Mostra Internazionale di Archit
Page 7 and 8:
01. Statement p. 6 marián zervan 0
Page 9 and 10:
Architecture must never lose its pr
Page 11 and 12:
The SNG building/area has long been
Page 14 and 15:
02. ON THE SLOVAK NATIONAL GALLERY
Page 16 and 17:
investor : Povereníctvo pre škols
Page 18 and 19:
Building(s) and spatial relationshi
Page 20 and 21:
the arcaded palace with a “cour d
Page 22 and 23:
give the quarter a new scale and ex
Page 24 and 25:
founded earlier. Therefore construc
Page 26 and 27:
in 1968) in 1966-1967 with the gall
Page 28 and 29:
with its central square, to a field
Page 30 and 31:
thing that had been outlived in the
Page 32 and 33:
The commission discussed these expe
Page 34 and 35:
In late 1969, i.e. after Czechoslov
Page 36 and 37:
The ceiling is of waved metal plate
Page 38 and 39:
The architect’s second alternativ
Page 40 and 41:
unbuilt stages III and IV. The (fut
Page 42 and 43:
“Doch gerade durch diese brachial
Page 44 and 45:
associated project of reconstructio
Page 46 and 47:
[1] [2]
Page 48 and 49:
[4] [5] [4-5] Vladimír Dedeček, S
Page 50 and 51:
[9] [10] [9-16] Vladimír Dedeček,
Page 52 and 53:
[18] [19] [18-23] Vladimír Dedeče
Page 54 and 55:
[26] [27] [26-29] Built edifices of
Page 56 and 57:
03a. TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF COMP
Page 58 and 59:
The Slovak National Gallery area si
Page 60 and 61:
was that either to allow for or to
Page 62 and 63:
The administrative building’s ter
Page 64 and 65:
Indeed the amphitheatre clusters ev
Page 66 and 67:
locked it in places (the Water Barr
Page 68 and 69:
03b. ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION O
Page 70 and 71: [d—02] Built SNG edifices {red} i
Page 72 and 73: [d—04] Paths of movement {red lin
Page 74 and 75: [d—06] Clusters of SNG “agoras
Page 76 and 77: [d—08] SNG interior “amphitheat
Page 78 and 79: C A B [d—10] Two introductory pro
Page 80 and 81: [d—12] Superimposition of 1 st an
Page 82 and 83: [d—14] Relationships of module fi
Page 84 and 85: [d—16] 1 st subterranean level wi
Page 86 and 87: [d—18] 2 nd level of administrati
Page 88 and 89: [d—20] 4 th level with paths of m
Page 90 and 91: [d—22] 6 th level with paths of m
Page 92 and 93: [d—24] Facade rasters {according
Page 94 and 95: [d—26] Built edifices of SNG area
Page 96 and 97: 04. CHRONOLOGY monika mitášová,
Page 98 and 99: 1961 the director of the SNG Dr. Ka
Page 100 and 101: 1969 a new initial project for the
Page 102 and 103: pressing. The architectural works t
Page 104 and 105: for Cultural and Educational Buildi
Page 106 and 107: 1987 journal Výtvarný život publ
Page 108 and 109: south Danube wing (closed due to it
Page 110 and 111: and demolished this square. (...) I
Page 112 and 113: not as an MP but as “the former d
Page 114 and 115: [is] a need to build any more so ca
Page 116 and 117: in Bratislava was announced. The ju
Page 118 and 119: down and changed the character of c
Page 122 and 123: Illah van Oijen prepared the first
Page 124 and 125: Arts Council to appreciate the valu
Page 126 and 127: Selected works of Vladimír Dedeče
Page 128 and 129: on 14 th March, the Týždeň magaz
Page 130 and 131: 05. PROJECT DESCRIPTION marián zer
Page 132 and 133: This project The Care for Architect
Page 134 and 135: The entrance wall in-between contai
Page 137 and 138: Metal exhibition model variants in
Page 139: Metal exhibition model (1:17,78) of
Page 143: 140 | 141
Page 146: This publication was made possible
show all

sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?