sng_2016-05-12_high-single-crop_k3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
not as an MP but as “the former dean of the Academy of<br />
Performing Arts [sic!, Academy of Fine Arts and Design, AFAD<br />
in Bratislava]”: “... The first discussion, which was held in<br />
the SNG, showed that the gallery management supported<br />
the preservation of the current state, based on the fictitious<br />
idea that a reconstruction will cost less and a new building<br />
will cost more. Some of the present designers, art historians<br />
and architects also declared that in their opinion the building<br />
should be preserved. The arguments used to support this<br />
opinion were, however, very vague. Statements such as those<br />
saying that a new gallery would ‘surely’ be more expensive,<br />
that the disassembly of the existing construction will be an<br />
insuperably problem, that it is ‘iconoclastic’ having no place<br />
in the beginning of the 21 st century, that the only reason for<br />
the removal of the existing object is the fact that it is a symbol<br />
of socialism, that it is actually good architecture, an example<br />
of an ‘alternative modern style’ or that it is already almost<br />
a cultural monument, are unconvincing and unacceptable for<br />
me. (...) I personally would prefer to disassemble the existing<br />
bridging. I am sure that the persons in charge must find the<br />
courage for such solutions. I have myself protected many<br />
pieces of modern architecture from demolition or inappropriate<br />
interventions. But it has always been in the case of good<br />
architecture. In this case I am convinced that this is bad<br />
architecture. The Slovak National Gallery building should be,<br />
as such, a piece of art. Take some examples – Guggenheim<br />
in New York, MOMA [sic!, MOCA] in Los Angeles, Sainsbury<br />
Wing in London, Hirshorn [Hirshhorn] in Washington,<br />
examples of new galleries and museums in Bonne, Frankfurt,<br />
Stockholm, Helsinki etc. There is no doubt Slovakia and<br />
Bratislava have the architectural potential to be able to<br />
cope with this problem with dignity, to enrich Bratislava and<br />
represent Slovakia, its architecture and culture.” 44<br />
The opinion of another discussion participant with<br />
executive political power, this time in municipal politics, the<br />
Old City Mayor Andrej Ďurkovský was similarly consistent:<br />
110