Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EMIGRATION A N D INTERNAL M I GRATION<br />
abandoning the countryside. ‘La terra non rende piu’ is a complaint heard all<br />
over <strong>Italy</strong> and few young people are content to be just peasants any more. In fact,<br />
evidence o f the drift, as revealed in the landscape in the form o f abandoned<br />
holdings and deserted farmsteads and o f arable turned over to woodland and<br />
grazing, is more apparent in Alpine and central <strong>Italy</strong> than in the South where the<br />
economic pressures are greater but the alternative opportunities are less.<br />
Secondly, the incidence o f urbanization is uneven; in the last decade the small<br />
towns, particularly in the remoter mountain and hill country, have barely held<br />
their own. They have been by-passed for the larger cities, especially Rome and<br />
the industrial centres o f Lombardy and Piedmont. The capital, whose population<br />
rose 31% in the decade 1951-1961, draws its increase largely from the<br />
Centre and South; the two northern regions also attract most o f their recruits<br />
from Calabria, Basilicata, Apuha and Sicily, but they are substantially reinforced<br />
from the Three Venetias. Compared with the exodus from Sicily, that from Sardinia<br />
is unimportant. Between 1951 and 1961 the populations <strong>of</strong> Milan and Turin<br />
rose by 26% and 46% respectively. The cities o f Emilia, particularly Bologna,<br />
Modena and Ravenna, also registered substantial increases (20-25%), mainly<br />
from the immediate countryside, but the essentially heavy industrial city o f<br />
Genoa increased by only 16% . Where special factors were at work some o f the<br />
smaller urban areas recorded an above-average increase, for example Caghari,<br />
Grosseto, Latina and Catania, which are benefiting from local development<br />
projects. Ravenna, which has found a new lease <strong>of</strong> life in terms o f petro-chemicals,<br />
and Salerno, which was rebuilt during the relevant decade, fall into a similar<br />
category. Trieste, whose economic difficulties have received attention above,<br />
scarcely increased at all and Venice’s performance was much below average:<br />
TABLE 3<br />
POPULATION INCREASES I 9 5 I - I 9 6 1 FOR SELECTED<br />
CITY COMMUNES<br />
In 1961 the population <strong>of</strong> the main urban communes totalled<br />
16,526,000, an increase <strong>of</strong> 21% on the 1951 figure<br />
®/ /o<br />
Turin (1,050,000) 46<br />
Latina (50,000) 43<br />
Rome (2,246,000) 31<br />
Grosseto (52,000) 31<br />
Cagliari (187,000) 23<br />
Bologna (456,000) 27<br />
Modena (143,000) 26<br />
Raveima (116,000) 26<br />
Milan (1,599,000) 26<br />
Salerno (123,000) 26<br />
Verona (230,000)<br />
Brescia (180,000)<br />
Catania (363,000)<br />
Palermo (593,000)<br />
%<br />
23<br />
22<br />
20<br />
18<br />
Florence (459,000) 17<br />
Naples (1,196,000) 17<br />
Bari (317,000) 16<br />
Genoa (796,000) 16<br />
Venice (359,000) 11<br />
Trieste (273,000) o<br />
It is quite certain that the scale o f urbanization is greater than the statistics suggest;<br />
in most urban areas there is a sizeable group o f new arrivals, who escape,<br />
not always unintentionally, the statistical net. In fact it is only in recent years that<br />
the administrative restrictions on internal migration have been relaxed. The<br />
239