04.06.2016 Views

Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy

Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy

Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EMIGRATION A N D INTERNAL M I GRATION<br />

abandoning the countryside. ‘La terra non rende piu’ is a complaint heard all<br />

over <strong>Italy</strong> and few young people are content to be just peasants any more. In fact,<br />

evidence o f the drift, as revealed in the landscape in the form o f abandoned<br />

holdings and deserted farmsteads and o f arable turned over to woodland and<br />

grazing, is more apparent in Alpine and central <strong>Italy</strong> than in the South where the<br />

economic pressures are greater but the alternative opportunities are less.<br />

Secondly, the incidence o f urbanization is uneven; in the last decade the small<br />

towns, particularly in the remoter mountain and hill country, have barely held<br />

their own. They have been by-passed for the larger cities, especially Rome and<br />

the industrial centres o f Lombardy and Piedmont. The capital, whose population<br />

rose 31% in the decade 1951-1961, draws its increase largely from the<br />

Centre and South; the two northern regions also attract most o f their recruits<br />

from Calabria, Basilicata, Apuha and Sicily, but they are substantially reinforced<br />

from the Three Venetias. Compared with the exodus from Sicily, that from Sardinia<br />

is unimportant. Between 1951 and 1961 the populations <strong>of</strong> Milan and Turin<br />

rose by 26% and 46% respectively. The cities o f Emilia, particularly Bologna,<br />

Modena and Ravenna, also registered substantial increases (20-25%), mainly<br />

from the immediate countryside, but the essentially heavy industrial city o f<br />

Genoa increased by only 16% . Where special factors were at work some o f the<br />

smaller urban areas recorded an above-average increase, for example Caghari,<br />

Grosseto, Latina and Catania, which are benefiting from local development<br />

projects. Ravenna, which has found a new lease <strong>of</strong> life in terms o f petro-chemicals,<br />

and Salerno, which was rebuilt during the relevant decade, fall into a similar<br />

category. Trieste, whose economic difficulties have received attention above,<br />

scarcely increased at all and Venice’s performance was much below average:<br />

TABLE 3<br />

POPULATION INCREASES I 9 5 I - I 9 6 1 FOR SELECTED<br />

CITY COMMUNES<br />

In 1961 the population <strong>of</strong> the main urban communes totalled<br />

16,526,000, an increase <strong>of</strong> 21% on the 1951 figure<br />

®/ /o<br />

Turin (1,050,000) 46<br />

Latina (50,000) 43<br />

Rome (2,246,000) 31<br />

Grosseto (52,000) 31<br />

Cagliari (187,000) 23<br />

Bologna (456,000) 27<br />

Modena (143,000) 26<br />

Raveima (116,000) 26<br />

Milan (1,599,000) 26<br />

Salerno (123,000) 26<br />

Verona (230,000)<br />

Brescia (180,000)<br />

Catania (363,000)<br />

Palermo (593,000)<br />

%<br />

23<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

Florence (459,000) 17<br />

Naples (1,196,000) 17<br />

Bari (317,000) 16<br />

Genoa (796,000) 16<br />

Venice (359,000) 11<br />

Trieste (273,000) o<br />

It is quite certain that the scale o f urbanization is greater than the statistics suggest;<br />

in most urban areas there is a sizeable group o f new arrivals, who escape,<br />

not always unintentionally, the statistical net. In fact it is only in recent years that<br />

the administrative restrictions on internal migration have been relaxed. The<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!