Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
Walker - 1967 - A geography of Italy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PART IV: ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY<br />
but in the long term there is no alternative but to drain <strong>of</strong>f surplus labour into<br />
industry either locally or further afield.<br />
The third main type o f large unit, generally referred to as the latifondo<br />
capitalistico (despite its imdercapitalized nature), was identified until quite<br />
recently with the Maremma, the Tavoliere di Puglie, Marchesato, the coastlands<br />
o f Basilicata and parts o f the Sicilian interior. With its absentee owners it was<br />
much criticized for its low yields, for its unenterprising methods, for its preoccupation<br />
with a small range o f products (notably wheat, wool, wine and<br />
olives) and above all for its inability to provide tolerable living standards for the<br />
sharecroppers and labourers, whether local or migrant, on which the latifondo<br />
depended. Even before the land reform o f 1950 (p. 191) the latifondo zones were<br />
undergoing a change; where the land was capable o f improvement some progress<br />
towards higher standards and greater diversity had been made, either by direct<br />
state intervention or through the efforts o f comorzi di bonifica, and a steadily<br />
increasing proportion o f the land was passing into the hands o f the peasantry.<br />
The land reform has drastically accelerated this process and has brought home<br />
to the large operators the need for a more responsible attitude towards the land.<br />
In fairness it has to be admitted that in many o f the areas concerned, especially<br />
where the main problem is water control, the necessary improvements were<br />
beyond the resoiuces o f the landowners, and there are certainly vast tracts<br />
where, because o f the adverse physical conditions, some form o f extensive<br />
operation is imavoidable.<br />
The output o f agricultural products is very vulnerable to the vagaries o f the<br />
weather but over the period 1953-1963 the index showed a rise o f 22% ; over the<br />
same period agriculture was responsible for a steadily declining proportion o f the<br />
national income and exports. A summary <strong>of</strong> the land-use and crop areas for 1963<br />
is given in table 10. Compared with 1953 there have been few major changes in<br />
crop areas or in yields which cannot be attributed to the weather. S<strong>of</strong>t wheat, used<br />
for bread and grown mainly in the more humid North, has tended to decline in<br />
acreage but that o f hard wheat, used for pasta and confined largely to the South,<br />
has remained roughly the same. Production is sufficient for the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />
the country’s needs. The ubiquity o f wheat production and its cultivation on<br />
marginal land have already received attention. <strong>Italy</strong> is Europe’s foremost producer<br />
o f maize which is mainly fed to stock but is also used for hiunan consumption,<br />
usually in the form o f pollenta, a Venetian speciality. It is best suited to<br />
those areas with adequate summer rainfall or with irrigation facilities, notably in<br />
the Northern Lowlands and to a lesser degree in Campania (fig. 48). American<br />
hybrid seed, which produces double the yield o f Itahan varieties, accounts for<br />
half the production and is grown mainly in the North. Rice, which is used as a<br />
pioneer crop in the first stages o f marsh reclamation, is dechning in acreage<br />
partly because o f the difficulty o f obtaining seasonal labour. It is now almost<br />
entirely confined to Lomellina. Quahty and yields are very high and production<br />
is sufficient to provide a modest export. The main leguminous fodder crops are<br />
244