Secret_History

Chapter 7: Ancient Enigmas 223
The traditional Ainu lifestyle was hunting, fishing and gathering. Ainu religious
beliefs center around the existence of another world of spirit essences subject to
the same forces that control the visible world. The people worship animal gods,
especially the bear, with ritual, song and dance. Even the Ainu language is
unusual in its Asian environment. Although they possessed no system of writing,
they created a rich oral tradition of stories and poems expressed in formal prose
and verse. We, of course, immediately think of the Bear cults of Europe, and the
bear skulls found in the caves of France dating back in the tens of thousands of
years.
The Ainu are a morphological problem. The characteristics that differentiate
them from Asians are their hairiness and their hair “form”. The explanation is that
there is a strong admixture of Caucasoid genetics in the Ainu. Some experts
consider them to be related to the Australian aborigines, and others think that they
represent an independent grouping altogether. More recent studies have connected
them genetically to Turkic populations of Central Asia, a combination of
caucasoid and mongoloid genes.
So how are we to relate this “archaeology” of a “preliterate” culture to the fact
that there is evidence of nearby remains of a former civilization far more advanced
than the Jomon? I think that noting the dates might be important. It is as though
the Jomon were survivors of a cataclysm. The infrastructure of their society may
have been destroyed, along with many of the artifacts that might have been
discovered by archaeologists of our day, and they began anew on a planet that had
been swept clean - except for stone structures that survived the maelstrom.
Global Evidence of Ancient, Pre-Historic High Civilizations
Over and over again we find these odd clues that point to an ancient civilization
that existed something over 12,000 years ago. There has been a raging controversy
for generations between pro-Atlanteans and anti-Atlanteans about this. There seem
to be sufficient archaeological remains to justify a serious scientific study based on
such a hypothesis but so far, there are no “takers” in the mainstream scientific
community. Archaeology and ethnology, being observational sciences, and not
experimental sciences, have built their entire framework upon the study of those
remains. And when we look closely at the array of discoveries in those fields, we
note bits and pieces of cultures of almost unspeakable age. The fact that
uniformitarian science barely allows the idea of cataclysmic destruction to be part
of the hypothesis cripples archaeologists and, in the end, may make fools of them
all.
Without the algorithm of cyclic cataclysm, archaeologists cannot fully
understand what they observe, nor can they explain the anomalies here and there,
and the lack of other evidence that ought to be here and there (if one assumes great
antiquity of civilization with no cataclysms). The fact seems to be that, what does
continue to exist in terms of archaeological remains from times before 7,000 or
more years ago, have been subjected to geological and cosmic cataclysms of
almost incomprehensible violence and few major relics remain for perusal. Those
few, however, are cast aside as the anomalies of archaeology and ethnology, and