18.02.2018 Views

Secret_History

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 10: Who Wrote the Bible and Why? 427<br />

It is understood that Manetho only included 30 dynasties, the 31st being added<br />

later for the sake of completeness. However, the fact is, there are no original<br />

copies of The Egyptian <strong>History</strong> by Manetho. All we have of his work are excerpts<br />

cited by Josephus, the Jewish historian of the first century AD, and by two<br />

important Christian chronographers, Sextus Julius Africanus (3rd century AD),<br />

and Eusebius (4th century AD). George the Monk, Syncellus, used both Africanus<br />

and Eusebius extensively as his sources in his history of the world written in 800<br />

AD. It is fairly easy to realize that all three of these men had agendas. We also<br />

note, once again, the period of time in which they were writing, and the fruits of<br />

their efforts in terms of the imposition of Christianity based on the platform of<br />

Judaism, the ultimate arbiter of the “you are doomed” linear view of Time.<br />

It is regularly claimed that Egyptian chronology is based on “astronomical<br />

dating”. What does this mean? It actually means that Egyptian dating is based on a<br />

theory that the Egyptians used astronomical dating. But many people do not<br />

realize this and believe that Egyptian chronology is actually based on astronomy.<br />

The fact is there are astronomically fixed Near Eastern dates, but they are not<br />

Egyptian dates. Two Babylonian cuneiform tablets have been found, each one<br />

filled with an entire year of data on the sun, planets, and eclipses. These dates fix<br />

two years: part of 568 / 567 B.C. and part of 523 / 522 B.C. Those are our oldest<br />

astronomically fixed dates. There is one other older Near Eastern eclipse, noted by<br />

the Assyrians, which has enough partial data to fix it at one of two years: it applies<br />

either to 763 BC or 791 BC. But experts do not agree on which date this eclipse<br />

occurred.<br />

When we dig even deeper into these dating assumptions, we find that the main<br />

peg upon which the assumptions are hung is called the “Sothic cycle”.<br />

What is the Sothic cycle?<br />

The experts tell us that the Egyptian civil year had 365 days - 3 seasons, (Akhet,<br />

Peret, Shemu), 4 months each with 30 days per month. To this, they added 5<br />

additional epagomenal days. Since the actual orbit of the earth around the sun<br />

takes 365 and about a quarter days, this calendar falls behind by one day every<br />

four years. Nowadays, we correct this by adding an extra day every four years in a<br />

“leap year”. However, if no calendar corrections are made, such a year would soon<br />

create significant problems (the experts say). How the Egyptians dealt with this<br />

was a matter of some conjecture, and it was finally decided that they corrected<br />

their calendar every 1460 years at the time of the heliacal rising of Sirius.<br />

Where did this idea come from?<br />

Our information on the alleged Sothic cycle depends largely on the late classical<br />

writers Censorinus (ca. 238 AD) and Theon (379-395 AD). Sir William Flinders<br />

Petrie writes, referring to a table of purported observations of Sirius:<br />

Now in going backward the first great datum that we meet is that on the back of the<br />

medical Ebers papyrus, where it is stated that Sirius rose on the 9th of Epiphi in the<br />

9th year of Amenhotep I. As the 9th of Epiphi is 56 days before the 1st of Thoth,<br />

Sirius rose on that day at 4 X 56 years (224) before the dates at the head of the first<br />

column. As only 1322 B.C. can be the epoch here, so 1322 + 224 = 1546 B.C. for<br />

the 9th year of Amenhotep I, or 1554 B.C. for his accession. And as Aahmes I<br />

reigned 25 years, we reach 1579 B.C. for the accession of Aahmes and the<br />

beginning of the XVIIIth dynasty. This is not defined within a few years owing to<br />

four years being the equivalent of only one day’s shift; owing to the rising being

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!