14.12.2012 Views

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />

The procurement department at HMPS has invested considerable resources in<br />

trying to measure the different elements of quality provision within prison<br />

management. The result is that the tenders <strong>for</strong> individual management contracts<br />

outline 30 to 40 per<strong>for</strong>mance measures covering different aspects of prison<br />

management quality which bidders have to commit to meet. These per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

measures typically fall into seven broad categories:<br />

● keeping prisoners in custody;<br />

● maintaining order, control, discipline and a safe environment;<br />

● providing decent conditions and meeting prisoners’ needs;<br />

● providing positive regimes;<br />

● preparing prisoners <strong>for</strong> their return to the community;<br />

● delivering prison services; and<br />

● community relations.<br />

For example security is a key aspect of keeping prisoners in custody and is<br />

monitored according to both a quarterly and an annual per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

measurement system. Penalty points are accrued on a quarterly basis <strong>for</strong>:<br />

● failure to achieve an agreed percentage of planned searches;<br />

● discovery of serious items smuggled in;<br />

● failure of security procedures laid down in the Prison Service Security<br />

Manual; and/or<br />

● failure to observe key/lock procedures laid down in the Prison Service<br />

Security Manual.<br />

Annual penalty points are incurred <strong>for</strong>:<br />

● failure to achieve an ‘acceptable’ or higher rating in the Security Audit during<br />

the relevant per<strong>for</strong>mance year; and/or<br />

● failure to achieve the agreed Key Per<strong>for</strong>mance Target percentage compliance<br />

with local planned preventative maintenance with respect to all equipment.<br />

Credit points can be awarded <strong>for</strong> a rating above ‘acceptable’ in the Security<br />

Audit. These can be offset against penalty points incurred against certain annual<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance measures, specified in the contract.<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance-management system is based on points <strong>for</strong> failing various<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance metrics, such as the occurrence of an assault. As no prison will ever<br />

be without failure, contract negotiations include a threshold number of points<br />

below which no financial penalty is incurred based on the particular<br />

characteristics of the prison. These thresholds apply quarterly. At the end of each<br />

quarter, per<strong>for</strong>mance points are summed together and if they lie below the<br />

contractual threshold, no further action is taken. If they exceed this level,<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!