Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />
The procurement department at HMPS has invested considerable resources in<br />
trying to measure the different elements of quality provision within prison<br />
management. The result is that the tenders <strong>for</strong> individual management contracts<br />
outline 30 to 40 per<strong>for</strong>mance measures covering different aspects of prison<br />
management quality which bidders have to commit to meet. These per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
measures typically fall into seven broad categories:<br />
● keeping prisoners in custody;<br />
● maintaining order, control, discipline and a safe environment;<br />
● providing decent conditions and meeting prisoners’ needs;<br />
● providing positive regimes;<br />
● preparing prisoners <strong>for</strong> their return to the community;<br />
● delivering prison services; and<br />
● community relations.<br />
For example security is a key aspect of keeping prisoners in custody and is<br />
monitored according to both a quarterly and an annual per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
measurement system. Penalty points are accrued on a quarterly basis <strong>for</strong>:<br />
● failure to achieve an agreed percentage of planned searches;<br />
● discovery of serious items smuggled in;<br />
● failure of security procedures laid down in the Prison Service Security<br />
Manual; and/or<br />
● failure to observe key/lock procedures laid down in the Prison Service<br />
Security Manual.<br />
Annual penalty points are incurred <strong>for</strong>:<br />
● failure to achieve an ‘acceptable’ or higher rating in the Security Audit during<br />
the relevant per<strong>for</strong>mance year; and/or<br />
● failure to achieve the agreed Key Per<strong>for</strong>mance Target percentage compliance<br />
with local planned preventative maintenance with respect to all equipment.<br />
Credit points can be awarded <strong>for</strong> a rating above ‘acceptable’ in the Security<br />
Audit. These can be offset against penalty points incurred against certain annual<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance measures, specified in the contract.<br />
The per<strong>for</strong>mance-management system is based on points <strong>for</strong> failing various<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance metrics, such as the occurrence of an assault. As no prison will ever<br />
be without failure, contract negotiations include a threshold number of points<br />
below which no financial penalty is incurred based on the particular<br />
characteristics of the prison. These thresholds apply quarterly. At the end of each<br />
quarter, per<strong>for</strong>mance points are summed together and if they lie below the<br />
contractual threshold, no further action is taken. If they exceed this level,<br />
98