14.12.2012 Views

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />

taxed. <strong>Market</strong> failures could arise in these markets if the input were already<br />

subject to some <strong>for</strong>m of price distortion or if the output market were supplied by<br />

a monopolist, <strong>for</strong> example. These problems can be minimised through<br />

appropriate tax design, in particular, by taxing the input or output most strongly<br />

correlated with pollutant levels and by taking account of other market<br />

imperfections when setting the tax rate.<br />

DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF TAX<br />

The appropriate level of unit tax is the level which will lead to the optimal level<br />

of pollution. This requires knowledge of incremental costs and benefits of<br />

pollution damages over a substantial range, a feat that is likely to be difficult to<br />

achieve in practice. Estimating benefits of pollution reduction is particularly<br />

problematic. As Baumol and Brad<strong>for</strong>d (1972) demonstrate, the nature of<br />

negative externalities mean that there is unlikely to be a single appropriate level<br />

of tax that would result in an equilibrium output level. In that case, it may be<br />

better to control the quantity of the negative externality, through permits, and<br />

letting the market determine the appropriate level of the tax.<br />

Political interference/inappropriate use of tax<br />

Although the purpose of the tax may be to control pollution, governments may<br />

be tempted to use the tax as a revenue-raising device. This may lead to the tax<br />

being set at a higher level than is optimal. Such inappropriate use could also<br />

undermine support <strong>for</strong> the real objective of correcting <strong>for</strong> the negative<br />

externality.<br />

Growth and inflation<br />

A nominal tax designed to induce optimal emissions at one point in time will fail<br />

to do so in the future in the presence of growth and rising prices. This requires<br />

continual upward revision of the tax by the government, which is likely to be<br />

both costly and politically unpopular. Tradable permits on the other hand<br />

automatically accommodate these features of a dynamic economy. 236<br />

Location<br />

The effect of emissions on the environment and thus the optimal level of<br />

emissions is likely to vary across different locations, suggesting a differential<br />

unit tax that is unlikely to receive political support. However, imposing a uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />

tax may lead to sub-optimal outcomes. 237<br />

236 Cropper, M. and W. Oates. (1992) ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30(2).<br />

237 Cropper, M. and W. Oates. (1992) ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30(2)..<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!