Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />
taxed. <strong>Market</strong> failures could arise in these markets if the input were already<br />
subject to some <strong>for</strong>m of price distortion or if the output market were supplied by<br />
a monopolist, <strong>for</strong> example. These problems can be minimised through<br />
appropriate tax design, in particular, by taxing the input or output most strongly<br />
correlated with pollutant levels and by taking account of other market<br />
imperfections when setting the tax rate.<br />
DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF TAX<br />
The appropriate level of unit tax is the level which will lead to the optimal level<br />
of pollution. This requires knowledge of incremental costs and benefits of<br />
pollution damages over a substantial range, a feat that is likely to be difficult to<br />
achieve in practice. Estimating benefits of pollution reduction is particularly<br />
problematic. As Baumol and Brad<strong>for</strong>d (1972) demonstrate, the nature of<br />
negative externalities mean that there is unlikely to be a single appropriate level<br />
of tax that would result in an equilibrium output level. In that case, it may be<br />
better to control the quantity of the negative externality, through permits, and<br />
letting the market determine the appropriate level of the tax.<br />
Political interference/inappropriate use of tax<br />
Although the purpose of the tax may be to control pollution, governments may<br />
be tempted to use the tax as a revenue-raising device. This may lead to the tax<br />
being set at a higher level than is optimal. Such inappropriate use could also<br />
undermine support <strong>for</strong> the real objective of correcting <strong>for</strong> the negative<br />
externality.<br />
Growth and inflation<br />
A nominal tax designed to induce optimal emissions at one point in time will fail<br />
to do so in the future in the presence of growth and rising prices. This requires<br />
continual upward revision of the tax by the government, which is likely to be<br />
both costly and politically unpopular. Tradable permits on the other hand<br />
automatically accommodate these features of a dynamic economy. 236<br />
Location<br />
The effect of emissions on the environment and thus the optimal level of<br />
emissions is likely to vary across different locations, suggesting a differential<br />
unit tax that is unlikely to receive political support. However, imposing a uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />
tax may lead to sub-optimal outcomes. 237<br />
236 Cropper, M. and W. Oates. (1992) ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30(2).<br />
237 Cropper, M. and W. Oates. (1992) ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 30(2)..<br />
192