14.12.2012 Views

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Existing market failures<br />

If an existing market failure, in addition to the externality, exists, the use of a tax<br />

may fail to maximise social welfare. For example, in an industry with a<br />

monopoly supplier we would expect (everything else being equal) output to<br />

already be lower than the socially optimal level. Where we have both a pollution<br />

externality and monopoly power it will not be clear whether existing output is<br />

above or below the socially optimal level. In the latter case a pollution tax would<br />

reduce output further below the socially optimal level. In the presence of market<br />

power it may there<strong>for</strong>e be appropriate to have a lower tax, or no tax at all.<br />

Measuring emissions<br />

Where a tax is used to control pollution it will be necessary to accurately<br />

measure emissions. Where measurement is not feasible it may be possible to<br />

use a proxy measure, such as an input associated with the relevant pollutant –<br />

coal could be used as a proxy <strong>for</strong> SO 2 emissions, <strong>for</strong> example. The use of such<br />

proxies can reduce measurement and en<strong>for</strong>cement costs, but can also reduce<br />

the efficiency of the tax. The tax might fail to provide incentives to use<br />

technologies which reduces the level of emissions per unit of input, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

The appropriate tax rate<br />

Calculating an appropriate tax rate would in theory require accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on the marginal cost to society of the externality that is taxed. In practice this<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is unlikely to be known, which may suggest that a marketablepermit<br />

system might be more appropriate. Where a tax is used it will be<br />

necessary to adjust its level <strong>for</strong>m time to time to reflect the effects of inflation<br />

and economic growth – a process which occurs automatically through changes<br />

in market prices under a marketable-permit scheme.<br />

Subsidies<br />

Subsidies raise many of the same issues as taxes. In addition, where a subsidy<br />

is used to reward reductions in a negative externality by increasing the quantity<br />

consumed of a substitute good (reductions in pollution, <strong>for</strong> example) there is a<br />

risk that the subsidy will encourage new entry into the industry, thereby<br />

increasing the overall level of the externality. For this reason, a tax is likely to be<br />

more effective at reducing a negative externality.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Section 7 – <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> Mechanisms<br />

Taxes and subsidies can be a more efficient means of achieving a desired level<br />

of externality than direct regulation. They may be preferable to a marketable<br />

permit scheme where uncertainty surrounding the cost of externality reduction<br />

means that setting the wrong quantity of permits could have significant and<br />

undesirable economic impacts. However, they can also drive the economy<br />

further from the socially optimal outcome when other market failures are<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!