Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Existing market failures<br />
If an existing market failure, in addition to the externality, exists, the use of a tax<br />
may fail to maximise social welfare. For example, in an industry with a<br />
monopoly supplier we would expect (everything else being equal) output to<br />
already be lower than the socially optimal level. Where we have both a pollution<br />
externality and monopoly power it will not be clear whether existing output is<br />
above or below the socially optimal level. In the latter case a pollution tax would<br />
reduce output further below the socially optimal level. In the presence of market<br />
power it may there<strong>for</strong>e be appropriate to have a lower tax, or no tax at all.<br />
Measuring emissions<br />
Where a tax is used to control pollution it will be necessary to accurately<br />
measure emissions. Where measurement is not feasible it may be possible to<br />
use a proxy measure, such as an input associated with the relevant pollutant –<br />
coal could be used as a proxy <strong>for</strong> SO 2 emissions, <strong>for</strong> example. The use of such<br />
proxies can reduce measurement and en<strong>for</strong>cement costs, but can also reduce<br />
the efficiency of the tax. The tax might fail to provide incentives to use<br />
technologies which reduces the level of emissions per unit of input, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />
The appropriate tax rate<br />
Calculating an appropriate tax rate would in theory require accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
on the marginal cost to society of the externality that is taxed. In practice this<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation is unlikely to be known, which may suggest that a marketablepermit<br />
system might be more appropriate. Where a tax is used it will be<br />
necessary to adjust its level <strong>for</strong>m time to time to reflect the effects of inflation<br />
and economic growth – a process which occurs automatically through changes<br />
in market prices under a marketable-permit scheme.<br />
Subsidies<br />
Subsidies raise many of the same issues as taxes. In addition, where a subsidy<br />
is used to reward reductions in a negative externality by increasing the quantity<br />
consumed of a substitute good (reductions in pollution, <strong>for</strong> example) there is a<br />
risk that the subsidy will encourage new entry into the industry, thereby<br />
increasing the overall level of the externality. For this reason, a tax is likely to be<br />
more effective at reducing a negative externality.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Section 7 – <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> Mechanisms<br />
Taxes and subsidies can be a more efficient means of achieving a desired level<br />
of externality than direct regulation. They may be preferable to a marketable<br />
permit scheme where uncertainty surrounding the cost of externality reduction<br />
means that setting the wrong quantity of permits could have significant and<br />
undesirable economic impacts. However, they can also drive the economy<br />
further from the socially optimal outcome when other market failures are<br />
65