14.12.2012 Views

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />

Camden is an example of a high demand area that chose to retain its pointsbased<br />

system largely because it felt that an effective currency expressed in<br />

points mimicked the operation of prices in a real market more closely than<br />

bands. By giving an indicative price <strong>for</strong> each property, Camden hopes<br />

households will look at this price relative to their currency and work out if they<br />

have a realistic chance of accessing a similar property or whether they should<br />

adjust their search strategy accordingly.<br />

In total, five broad approaches have been used to assess housing need <strong>for</strong> CBL<br />

schemes. These have allocated to households either:<br />

● a number of points with which to bid. These points are related to housing<br />

circumstances, as under a traditional points system;<br />

● a housing-need band with which to bid. Within bands, households can be<br />

ranked by date order;<br />

● an amount of waiting time with which to bid, typically taken from registration<br />

date. These systems often include a time-limited priority card <strong>for</strong> urgent<br />

re-housing cases;<br />

● differential status on the basis of tenancy history. For example, an excellent<br />

tenant (based on criteria including tenancy standards, such as keeping rent<br />

payments up to date) could be offered a property in preference to an<br />

otherwise identical non-excellent tenant; or<br />

● a property on a first-come-first-served basis. This approach typically<br />

complements the main CBL approach based on housing need or waiting time,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, <strong>for</strong> properties receiving no expression of interest following<br />

advertisement.<br />

The means used to assess housing need strongly influences the type of<br />

applicant who can access which property. If no other constraints are placed on<br />

bidding, households awarded the highest amount of currency under the chosen<br />

assessment mechanism will be the successful bidders. One constraint that can<br />

be placed on bidding is property labelling, which can be used to restrict the type<br />

of applicants entitled to bid <strong>for</strong> a particular property. Labelling criteria may take<br />

the <strong>for</strong>m of a minimum age requirement or number of children in the household,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, and often appear alongside the advert <strong>for</strong> the vacant property. They<br />

may also be incorporated into the rules of the scheme so that applicants are told<br />

the type of property <strong>for</strong> which they will be eligible to bid when they register.<br />

Labelling is often the vehicle through which other policy priorities are achieved,<br />

such as policies designed to create more sustainable communities.<br />

Once bidding closes, a shortlist <strong>for</strong> each property is drawn up ranking bidders by<br />

eligibility, currency level and any other relevant criteria. The eligible bidder with<br />

the highest amount of currency is then offered the property, subject to<br />

verification of their details.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!