14.12.2012 Views

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />

private sector involvement continues to deliver significant operating cost<br />

efficiency benefits but that the public sector comparator is no longer the most<br />

appropriate means of measuring these. Operating cost savings under this<br />

scenario also include the lower running costs of public prisons attributable to the<br />

development of a private sector market in prison services.<br />

SHARPER INCENTIVES FOR INNOVATION<br />

There are three main reasons <strong>for</strong> innovation being more likely in the private<br />

sector.<br />

● First, private sector contractors capture the entire rents from cost reducing<br />

innovation <strong>for</strong> the duration of the contract life since prices are agreed when a<br />

contract is signed. In contrast, public sector managers would be likely to see<br />

their budget cut the following year in response to a cost reducing innovation.<br />

● Second, innovative working practices may also be easier to introduce in the<br />

private sector where working practices are less firmly established.<br />

● Third, the process of competition may encourage both public and private<br />

sector bidders to be more responsive to customer needs.<br />

There is indeed evidence that competition, and, more broadly, the threat of<br />

competition, has delivered greater innovation in the following areas.<br />

Staff recruitment and deployment<br />

The largest opportunity <strong>for</strong> innovation in a prison-management contract is in<br />

staff deployment, as staff represent around 80 per cent of running costs.<br />

Innovation in staff deployment and recruitment has included a flatter<br />

management structure and the recruitment of a younger, more flexible<br />

work<strong>for</strong>ce, many of whom have had little or no prior experience in prisons.<br />

These features, combined with a higher average staff turnover, have facilitated<br />

the introduction of more flexible working practices such as shift work. As noted<br />

previously, low staff turnover rates in public prisons may make it more difficult<br />

to change established methods of operation. Shift patterns have enabled<br />

receptions to remain open longer, visiting times to be more flexible and<br />

prisoners on enhanced regimes to eat with their families.<br />

Although these recruitment practices may have increased flexibility, they have<br />

raised some concerns about security.<br />

Staff/Prisoner relationship<br />

One of the most significant innovations to occur has involved a focus on<br />

encouraging a more positive relationship between staff and prisoners. The CBI<br />

report notes that:<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!