Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Public Policy: Using Market-Based Approaches - Department for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>: <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Market</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approaches</strong><br />
private sector involvement continues to deliver significant operating cost<br />
efficiency benefits but that the public sector comparator is no longer the most<br />
appropriate means of measuring these. Operating cost savings under this<br />
scenario also include the lower running costs of public prisons attributable to the<br />
development of a private sector market in prison services.<br />
SHARPER INCENTIVES FOR INNOVATION<br />
There are three main reasons <strong>for</strong> innovation being more likely in the private<br />
sector.<br />
● First, private sector contractors capture the entire rents from cost reducing<br />
innovation <strong>for</strong> the duration of the contract life since prices are agreed when a<br />
contract is signed. In contrast, public sector managers would be likely to see<br />
their budget cut the following year in response to a cost reducing innovation.<br />
● Second, innovative working practices may also be easier to introduce in the<br />
private sector where working practices are less firmly established.<br />
● Third, the process of competition may encourage both public and private<br />
sector bidders to be more responsive to customer needs.<br />
There is indeed evidence that competition, and, more broadly, the threat of<br />
competition, has delivered greater innovation in the following areas.<br />
Staff recruitment and deployment<br />
The largest opportunity <strong>for</strong> innovation in a prison-management contract is in<br />
staff deployment, as staff represent around 80 per cent of running costs.<br />
Innovation in staff deployment and recruitment has included a flatter<br />
management structure and the recruitment of a younger, more flexible<br />
work<strong>for</strong>ce, many of whom have had little or no prior experience in prisons.<br />
These features, combined with a higher average staff turnover, have facilitated<br />
the introduction of more flexible working practices such as shift work. As noted<br />
previously, low staff turnover rates in public prisons may make it more difficult<br />
to change established methods of operation. Shift patterns have enabled<br />
receptions to remain open longer, visiting times to be more flexible and<br />
prisoners on enhanced regimes to eat with their families.<br />
Although these recruitment practices may have increased flexibility, they have<br />
raised some concerns about security.<br />
Staff/Prisoner relationship<br />
One of the most significant innovations to occur has involved a focus on<br />
encouraging a more positive relationship between staff and prisoners. The CBI<br />
report notes that:<br />
106