27.06.2018 Views

A history of Greek mathematics Vol.II from Aristarchus to Diophantus by Heath, Thomas Little, Sir, 1921

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ Η ΣΥΓΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΩΝ!!! ΦΕΚ,ΚΚΕ,ΚΝΕ,ΚΟΜΜΟΥΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΣΥΡΙΖΑ,ΠΑΣΟΚ,ΝΕΑ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ,ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΑ,ΔΑΠ-ΝΔΦΚ, MACEDONIA,ΣΥΜΜΟΡΙΤΟΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΟΡΕΣ,ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ,ΕΝΟΠΛΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΙΣ,ΣΤΡΑΤΟΣ, ΑΕΡΟΠΟΡΙΑ,ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΑ,ΔΗΜΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΝΟΜΑΡΧΙΑ,ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ,ΛΟΓΟΤΕΧΝΙΑ,ΔΗΜΟΣ,LIFO,ΛΑΡΙΣΑ, ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΟΝΝΕΔ,ΜΟΝΗ,ΠΑΤΡΙΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΜΕΣΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ,ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗ,ΟΛΜΕ,ΑΕΚ,ΠΑΟΚ,ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΑ,ΝΟΜΟΘΕΣΙΑ,ΔΙΚΗΓΟΡΙΚΟΣ,ΕΠΙΠΛΟ, ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΟΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ,ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ,ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΑ,ΑΥΓΗ,ΤΑ ΝΕΑ,ΕΘΝΟΣ,ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΜΟΣ,LEFT,ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ,ΚΟΚΚΙΝΟ,ATHENS VOICE,ΧΡΗΜΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑ,ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ, ΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΥΓΕΣ,GREECE,ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,ΜΑΓΕΙΡΙΚΗ,ΣΥΝΤΑΓΕΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΕΜΦΥΛΙΟΣ,ΤΗΛΕΟΡΑΣΗ,ΕΓΚΥΚΛΙΟΣ,ΡΑΔΙΟΦΩΝΟ,ΓΥΜΝΑΣΤΙΚΗ,ΑΓΡΟΤΙΚΗ,ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ, ΜΥΤΙΛΗΝΗ,ΧΙΟΣ,ΣΑΜΟΣ,ΠΑΤΡΙΔΑ,ΒΙΒΛΙΟ,ΕΡΕΥΝΑ,ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ,ΚΥΝΗΓΕΤΙΚΑ,ΚΥΝΗΓΙ,ΘΡΙΛΕΡ, ΠΕΡΙΟΔΙΚΟ,ΤΕΥΧΟΣ,ΜΥΘΙΣΤΟΡΗΜΑ,ΑΔΩΝΙΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΗΣ,GEORGIADIS,ΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΕΣ, ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΗ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΑ,ΙΚΕΑ,ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑ,ΑΤΤΙΚΗ,ΘΡΑΚΗ,ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ,ΠΑΤΡΑ, ΙΟΝΙΟ,ΚΕΡΚΥΡΑ,ΚΩΣ,ΡΟΔΟΣ,ΚΑΒΑΛΑ,ΜΟΔΑ,ΔΡΑΜΑ,ΣΕΡΡΕΣ,ΕΥΡΥΤΑΝΙΑ,ΠΑΡΓΑ,ΚΕΦΑΛΟΝΙΑ, ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΑ,ΛΕΥΚΑΔΑ,ΣΠΑΡΤΗ,ΠΑΞΟΙ

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)

ΚΑΤΩ Η ΣΥΓΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΩΝ!!!

ΦΕΚ,ΚΚΕ,ΚΝΕ,ΚΟΜΜΟΥΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΣΥΡΙΖΑ,ΠΑΣΟΚ,ΝΕΑ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ,ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΑ,ΔΑΠ-ΝΔΦΚ, MACEDONIA,ΣΥΜΜΟΡΙΤΟΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΟΡΕΣ,ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ,ΕΝΟΠΛΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΙΣ,ΣΤΡΑΤΟΣ, ΑΕΡΟΠΟΡΙΑ,ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΑ,ΔΗΜΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΝΟΜΑΡΧΙΑ,ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ,ΛΟΓΟΤΕΧΝΙΑ,ΔΗΜΟΣ,LIFO,ΛΑΡΙΣΑ, ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΟΝΝΕΔ,ΜΟΝΗ,ΠΑΤΡΙΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΜΕΣΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ,ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗ,ΟΛΜΕ,ΑΕΚ,ΠΑΟΚ,ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΑ,ΝΟΜΟΘΕΣΙΑ,ΔΙΚΗΓΟΡΙΚΟΣ,ΕΠΙΠΛΟ, ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΟΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ,ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ,ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΑ,ΑΥΓΗ,ΤΑ ΝΕΑ,ΕΘΝΟΣ,ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΜΟΣ,LEFT,ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ,ΚΟΚΚΙΝΟ,ATHENS VOICE,ΧΡΗΜΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑ,ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ, ΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΥΓΕΣ,GREECE,ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,ΜΑΓΕΙΡΙΚΗ,ΣΥΝΤΑΓΕΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΕΜΦΥΛΙΟΣ,ΤΗΛΕΟΡΑΣΗ,ΕΓΚΥΚΛΙΟΣ,ΡΑΔΙΟΦΩΝΟ,ΓΥΜΝΑΣΤΙΚΗ,ΑΓΡΟΤΙΚΗ,ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ, ΜΥΤΙΛΗΝΗ,ΧΙΟΣ,ΣΑΜΟΣ,ΠΑΤΡΙΔΑ,ΒΙΒΛΙΟ,ΕΡΕΥΝΑ,ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ,ΚΥΝΗΓΕΤΙΚΑ,ΚΥΝΗΓΙ,ΘΡΙΛΕΡ, ΠΕΡΙΟΔΙΚΟ,ΤΕΥΧΟΣ,ΜΥΘΙΣΤΟΡΗΜΑ,ΑΔΩΝΙΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΗΣ,GEORGIADIS,ΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΕΣ, ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΗ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΑ,ΙΚΕΑ,ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑ,ΑΤΤΙΚΗ,ΘΡΑΚΗ,ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ,ΠΑΤΡΑ, ΙΟΝΙΟ,ΚΕΡΚΥΡΑ,ΚΩΣ,ΡΟΔΟΣ,ΚΑΒΑΛΑ,ΜΟΔΑ,ΔΡΑΜΑ,ΣΕΡΡΕΣ,ΕΥΡΥΤΑΝΙΑ,ΠΑΡΓΑ,ΚΕΦΑΛΟΝΙΑ, ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΑ,ΛΕΥΚΑΔΑ,ΣΠΑΡΤΗ,ΠΑΞΟΙ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE COLLECTION. BOOK V<strong>II</strong> 403<br />

'<br />

utility. In justification <strong>of</strong> this statement and in order that<br />

he may not appear empty-handed when leaving the subject ',<br />

he will present his readers with the following.<br />

404 PAPPUS OF ALEXANDRIA<br />

If the passage is genuine, it seems <strong>to</strong> indicate, what is not<br />

elsewhere confirmed, that the Collection originally contained,<br />

or was intended <strong>to</strong> contain, twelve Books.<br />

(Anticipation <strong>of</strong> Guldins Theorem,)<br />

The enunciations are not very clearly worded, but there<br />

is no doubt as <strong>to</strong> the sense.<br />

Figures generated <strong>by</strong> a complete revolution <strong>of</strong> a plane figure<br />

'<br />

about an axis are in a ratio compounded (1) <strong>of</strong> the ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> the figures, and (2) <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> the straight<br />

lines similarly drawn <strong>to</strong> (i.e. drawn <strong>to</strong> meet at the same angles)<br />

the axes <strong>of</strong> rotation <strong>from</strong> the respective centres <strong>of</strong> gravity.<br />

Figures generated <strong>by</strong> incomplete revolutions are in the rcdio<br />

compounded (1) <strong>of</strong> the rcdio <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> the figures and<br />

(2) <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> the arcs described <strong>by</strong> the centres <strong>of</strong> gravity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the respective figures, the latter rcdio being itself compounded<br />

(a) <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> the straight lines similarly drawn {<strong>from</strong><br />

the respective centres <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>to</strong> the axes <strong>of</strong> rotation) and<br />

(b) <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> the angles contained (i. e. described) about<br />

the axes <strong>of</strong> revolution <strong>by</strong> the extremities <strong>of</strong> the said straight<br />

lines (i.e. the centres <strong>of</strong> gravity).'<br />

Here, obviously, we have the essence <strong>of</strong> the celebrated<br />

theorem commonly attributed <strong>to</strong> P. Guldin (1577-1643),<br />

'<br />

quantitas rotunda in viam rotationis ducta producit Potestatem<br />

Rotundam uno grado altiorem Potestate sive Quantitate<br />

Rotata *}<br />

Pappus adds that<br />

these propositions, which are practically one, include any<br />

c<br />

number <strong>of</strong> theorems <strong>of</strong> all sorts about curves, surfaces, and<br />

solids, all <strong>of</strong> which are proved at once <strong>by</strong> one demonstration,<br />

and include propositions both old and new, and in particular<br />

those proved in the twelfth Book <strong>of</strong> these Elements. 5<br />

Hultsch attributes the whole passage (pp. 680. 30-682. 20)<br />

<strong>to</strong> an interpola<strong>to</strong>r, I do not know for what reason; but it<br />

seems <strong>to</strong> me that the propositions are quite beyond what<br />

1<br />

Centrobaryca, Lib. ii, chap, viii, Prop. 3. Viemiae 1641.<br />

Dd2<br />

Lemmas <strong>to</strong> the different treatises.<br />

After the description <strong>of</strong> the treatises forming the Treasury<br />

<strong>of</strong> Analysis come the collections <strong>of</strong> lemmas given <strong>by</strong> Pappus<br />

<strong>to</strong> assist the student <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the books (except Euclid's<br />

Data) down <strong>to</strong> Apollonius's Conies, with two isolated lemmas<br />

<strong>to</strong> the Surface-Loci <strong>of</strong> Euclid. It is difficult <strong>to</strong> give any<br />

summary or any general idea <strong>of</strong> these lemmas, because they<br />

are very numerous, extremely various, and <strong>of</strong>ten quite<br />

could be expected <strong>from</strong> an interpola<strong>to</strong>r, indeed I know <strong>of</strong><br />

no <strong>Greek</strong> mathematician <strong>from</strong> Pappus's day onward except<br />

Pappus himself who was capable <strong>of</strong> discovering such a proposition.<br />

difficult,<br />

requiring first-rate ability and full command <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

resources <strong>of</strong> pure geometry. Their number is also greatly<br />

increased <strong>by</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> alternative pro<strong>of</strong>s, <strong>of</strong>ten requiring<br />

lemmas <strong>of</strong> their own, and <strong>by</strong> the separate formulation <strong>of</strong><br />

particular cases where <strong>by</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> algebra and conventions<br />

with regard <strong>to</strong> sign we can make one proposition cover all the<br />

cases. The style is admirably terse, <strong>of</strong>ten so condensed as <strong>to</strong><br />

make the argument difficult <strong>to</strong> follow without some little<br />

filling-out ; the hand is that <strong>of</strong> a master throughout. The<br />

only misfortune is that, the books elucidated being lost<br />

(except<br />

the Conies and the Cutting-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> a ratio <strong>of</strong> Apollonius), it is<br />

difficult, <strong>of</strong>ten impossible, <strong>to</strong> see the connexion <strong>of</strong> the lemmas<br />

with one another and the problems <strong>of</strong> the book <strong>to</strong> which they<br />

relate. In the circumstances, all that I can hope <strong>to</strong> do is <strong>to</strong><br />

indicate the types <strong>of</strong> propositions included in the lemmas and,<br />

<strong>by</strong> way <strong>of</strong> illustration, now and then <strong>to</strong> give a pro<strong>of</strong> where it<br />

is sufficiently out <strong>of</strong> the common.<br />

(a)<br />

Pappus begins with Lemmas <strong>to</strong> the Sectio rationis and<br />

Sectio spatii <strong>of</strong> Apollonius (Props. 1-21, pp. 684-704). The<br />

first two show how <strong>to</strong> divide a straight line in a given ratio,<br />

and how, given the first, second and fourth terms <strong>of</strong> a proportion<br />

between straight lines, <strong>to</strong> find the third term. The<br />

next section (Props. 3-12 and 16) shows how <strong>to</strong> manipulate<br />

relations between greater and less ratios <strong>by</strong> transforming<br />

them, e.g. componendo, convertendo, &c, in the same way<br />

as Euclid transforms equal ratios in Book V ; Prop. 1 6 proves<br />

that, according as a : b > or < c:d, ad > or < be. Props.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!