A history of Greek mathematics Vol.II from Aristarchus to Diophantus by Heath, Thomas Little, Sir, 1921
MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ Η ΣΥΓΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΩΝ!!! ΦΕΚ,ΚΚΕ,ΚΝΕ,ΚΟΜΜΟΥΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΣΥΡΙΖΑ,ΠΑΣΟΚ,ΝΕΑ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ,ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΑ,ΔΑΠ-ΝΔΦΚ, MACEDONIA,ΣΥΜΜΟΡΙΤΟΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΟΡΕΣ,ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ,ΕΝΟΠΛΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΙΣ,ΣΤΡΑΤΟΣ, ΑΕΡΟΠΟΡΙΑ,ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΑ,ΔΗΜΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΝΟΜΑΡΧΙΑ,ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ,ΛΟΓΟΤΕΧΝΙΑ,ΔΗΜΟΣ,LIFO,ΛΑΡΙΣΑ, ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΟΝΝΕΔ,ΜΟΝΗ,ΠΑΤΡΙΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΜΕΣΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ,ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗ,ΟΛΜΕ,ΑΕΚ,ΠΑΟΚ,ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΑ,ΝΟΜΟΘΕΣΙΑ,ΔΙΚΗΓΟΡΙΚΟΣ,ΕΠΙΠΛΟ, ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΟΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ,ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ,ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΑ,ΑΥΓΗ,ΤΑ ΝΕΑ,ΕΘΝΟΣ,ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΜΟΣ,LEFT,ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ,ΚΟΚΚΙΝΟ,ATHENS VOICE,ΧΡΗΜΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑ,ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ, ΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΥΓΕΣ,GREECE,ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,ΜΑΓΕΙΡΙΚΗ,ΣΥΝΤΑΓΕΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΕΜΦΥΛΙΟΣ,ΤΗΛΕΟΡΑΣΗ,ΕΓΚΥΚΛΙΟΣ,ΡΑΔΙΟΦΩΝΟ,ΓΥΜΝΑΣΤΙΚΗ,ΑΓΡΟΤΙΚΗ,ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ, ΜΥΤΙΛΗΝΗ,ΧΙΟΣ,ΣΑΜΟΣ,ΠΑΤΡΙΔΑ,ΒΙΒΛΙΟ,ΕΡΕΥΝΑ,ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ,ΚΥΝΗΓΕΤΙΚΑ,ΚΥΝΗΓΙ,ΘΡΙΛΕΡ, ΠΕΡΙΟΔΙΚΟ,ΤΕΥΧΟΣ,ΜΥΘΙΣΤΟΡΗΜΑ,ΑΔΩΝΙΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΗΣ,GEORGIADIS,ΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΕΣ, ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΗ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΑ,ΙΚΕΑ,ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑ,ΑΤΤΙΚΗ,ΘΡΑΚΗ,ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ,ΠΑΤΡΑ, ΙΟΝΙΟ,ΚΕΡΚΥΡΑ,ΚΩΣ,ΡΟΔΟΣ,ΚΑΒΑΛΑ,ΜΟΔΑ,ΔΡΑΜΑ,ΣΕΡΡΕΣ,ΕΥΡΥΤΑΝΙΑ,ΠΑΡΓΑ,ΚΕΦΑΛΟΝΙΑ, ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΑ,ΛΕΥΚΑΔΑ,ΣΠΑΡΤΗ,ΠΑΞΟΙ
MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)
ΚΑΤΩ Η ΣΥΓΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΩΝ!!!
ΦΕΚ,ΚΚΕ,ΚΝΕ,ΚΟΜΜΟΥΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΣΥΡΙΖΑ,ΠΑΣΟΚ,ΝΕΑ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ,ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΑ,ΔΑΠ-ΝΔΦΚ, MACEDONIA,ΣΥΜΜΟΡΙΤΟΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΟΡΕΣ,ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ,ΕΝΟΠΛΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΙΣ,ΣΤΡΑΤΟΣ, ΑΕΡΟΠΟΡΙΑ,ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΑ,ΔΗΜΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΝΟΜΑΡΧΙΑ,ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ,ΛΟΓΟΤΕΧΝΙΑ,ΔΗΜΟΣ,LIFO,ΛΑΡΙΣΑ, ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΟΝΝΕΔ,ΜΟΝΗ,ΠΑΤΡΙΑΡΧΕΙΟ,ΜΕΣΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ,ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗ,ΟΛΜΕ,ΑΕΚ,ΠΑΟΚ,ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΚΑ,ΝΟΜΟΘΕΣΙΑ,ΔΙΚΗΓΟΡΙΚΟΣ,ΕΠΙΠΛΟ, ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΟΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ,ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ,ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ,ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΑ,ΑΥΓΗ,ΤΑ ΝΕΑ,ΕΘΝΟΣ,ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΜΟΣ,LEFT,ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ,ΚΟΚΚΙΝΟ,ATHENS VOICE,ΧΡΗΜΑ,ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑ,ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ, ΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟΣ,ΠΡΟΣΦΥΓΕΣ,GREECE,ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,ΜΑΓΕΙΡΙΚΗ,ΣΥΝΤΑΓΕΣ,ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ,ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΕΜΦΥΛΙΟΣ,ΤΗΛΕΟΡΑΣΗ,ΕΓΚΥΚΛΙΟΣ,ΡΑΔΙΟΦΩΝΟ,ΓΥΜΝΑΣΤΙΚΗ,ΑΓΡΟΤΙΚΗ,ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ, ΜΥΤΙΛΗΝΗ,ΧΙΟΣ,ΣΑΜΟΣ,ΠΑΤΡΙΔΑ,ΒΙΒΛΙΟ,ΕΡΕΥΝΑ,ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ,ΚΥΝΗΓΕΤΙΚΑ,ΚΥΝΗΓΙ,ΘΡΙΛΕΡ, ΠΕΡΙΟΔΙΚΟ,ΤΕΥΧΟΣ,ΜΥΘΙΣΤΟΡΗΜΑ,ΑΔΩΝΙΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΗΣ,GEORGIADIS,ΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΕΣ, ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΑ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΗ,ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΑ,ΙΚΕΑ,ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑ,ΑΤΤΙΚΗ,ΘΡΑΚΗ,ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ,ΠΑΤΡΑ, ΙΟΝΙΟ,ΚΕΡΚΥΡΑ,ΚΩΣ,ΡΟΔΟΣ,ΚΑΒΑΛΑ,ΜΟΔΑ,ΔΡΑΜΑ,ΣΕΡΡΕΣ,ΕΥΡΥΤΑΝΙΑ,ΠΑΡΓΑ,ΚΕΦΑΛΟΝΙΑ, ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΑ,ΛΕΥΚΑΔΑ,ΣΠΑΡΤΗ,ΠΑΞΟΙ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE CONICS 131<br />
diorismi. Nicoteles indeed, on account <strong>of</strong> his controversy<br />
with Conon, will not have it that any use can be made <strong>of</strong> the<br />
discoveries <strong>of</strong> Conon for the purpose <strong>of</strong> diorismi; he is,<br />
however, mistaken in this opinion, for, even if it is possible,<br />
without using them at all, <strong>to</strong> arrive at results in regard <strong>to</strong><br />
limits <strong>of</strong> possibility, yet they at all events afford a readier<br />
means <strong>of</strong> observing some things, e.g. that several or so many<br />
solutions are possible, or again that no solution is possible<br />
and such foreknowledge secures a satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry basis for investigations,<br />
while the theorems in question are again useful<br />
for the analyses <strong>of</strong> diorismi. And, even apart <strong>from</strong> such<br />
usefulness, they will be found worthy <strong>of</strong> acceptance for the<br />
sake <strong>of</strong> the demonstrations themselves, just as we accept<br />
many other things in <strong>mathematics</strong> for this reason and for<br />
no other.<br />
The prefaces <strong>to</strong> Books V-V<strong>II</strong> now <strong>to</strong> be given are reproduced<br />
for Book V <strong>from</strong> the translation <strong>of</strong> L. Nix and for<br />
Books VI, V<strong>II</strong> <strong>from</strong> that <strong>of</strong> Halley.<br />
Preface <strong>to</strong> Book V.<br />
Apollonius <strong>to</strong> Attalus, greeting.<br />
In this fifth book I have laid down propositions relating <strong>to</strong><br />
maximum and minimum straight lines. You must know<br />
that my predecessors and contemporaries have only superficially<br />
<strong>to</strong>uched upon the investigation <strong>of</strong> the shortest lines,<br />
and have only proved what straight lines <strong>to</strong>uch the sections<br />
and. conversely, what properties they have in virtue <strong>of</strong> which<br />
they are tangents. For my part, 1 have proved these properties<br />
in the first book (without however making any use, in<br />
the pro<strong>of</strong>s, <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the shortest lines), inasmuch as<br />
I wished <strong>to</strong> place them in close connexion with that part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the subject in which I treat <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
conic sections, in order <strong>to</strong> show at the same time that in each<br />
<strong>of</strong> the three sections countless properties and necessary results<br />
appear, as they do with reference <strong>to</strong> the original (transverse)<br />
diameter. The propositions in which I discuss the shortest<br />
lines I have separated in<strong>to</strong> classes, and I have dealt with each<br />
individual case <strong>by</strong> careful demonstration ; I have also connected<br />
the investigation <strong>of</strong> them with the investigation <strong>of</strong><br />
the greatest lines above mentioned, because I considered that<br />
those who cultivate this science need them for obtaining<br />
a knowledge <strong>of</strong> the analysis, and determination <strong>of</strong> limits <strong>of</strong><br />
possibility, <strong>of</strong> problems as well as for their synthesis : in<br />
addition <strong>to</strong> which, the subject is one <strong>of</strong> those which seem<br />
worthy <strong>of</strong> study for their own sake. Farewell.<br />
k2<br />
132 APOLLONIUS OF PERGA<br />
Preface <strong>to</strong> Book VI.<br />
Apollonius <strong>to</strong> Attalus, greeting.<br />
I send you the sixth book <strong>of</strong> the conies, which embraces<br />
propositions about conic sections and segments <strong>of</strong> conies equal<br />
and unequal, similar and dissimilar, besides some other matters<br />
left out <strong>by</strong> those who have preceded me. In particular, you<br />
will find in this book how, in a given right cone, a section can<br />
be cut which is equal <strong>to</strong> a given section, and how a right cone<br />
can be described similar <strong>to</strong> a given cone but such as <strong>to</strong> contain<br />
a given conic section. And these matters in truth I have<br />
treated somewhat more fully and clearly than those who wrote<br />
before my time on these subjects. Farewell.<br />
Preface <strong>to</strong> Book V<strong>II</strong>.<br />
Apollonius <strong>to</strong> Attalus, greeting.<br />
I send <strong>to</strong> you with this letter the seventh book on conic<br />
sections. In it are contained a large number <strong>of</strong> new propositions<br />
concerning diameters <strong>of</strong> sections and the figures described<br />
upon them ;<br />
and all these propositions have their uses in many<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> problems, especially in the determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
limits <strong>of</strong> their possibility. Several examples <strong>of</strong> these occur<br />
in the determinate conic problems solved and demonstrated<br />
<strong>by</strong> me in the eighth book, which is <strong>by</strong> way <strong>of</strong> an appendix,<br />
and which I will make a point <strong>of</strong> sending <strong>to</strong> you as soon<br />
as possible. Farewell.<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> claim <strong>to</strong> originality.<br />
We gather <strong>from</strong> these prefaces a very good idea <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plan followed <strong>by</strong> Apollonius in the arrangement <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>to</strong> which he claims originality. The<br />
first four Books form, as he says, an elementary introduction,<br />
<strong>by</strong> which he means an exposition <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> conies,<br />
that is, the definitions and the fundamental propositions<br />
which are <strong>of</strong> the most general use and application ; the term<br />
'<br />
elements ' is in fact used with reference <strong>to</strong> conies in exactly<br />
the same sense as Euclid uses it <strong>to</strong> describe his great work.<br />
The remaining Books beginning with Book V are devoted <strong>to</strong><br />
more specialized investigation <strong>of</strong> particular parts <strong>of</strong> the subject.<br />
It is only for a very small portion <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> the<br />
treatise that Apollonius claims originality ; in the first three<br />
Books the claim is confined <strong>to</strong> certain propositions bearing on<br />
the ' locus with respect <strong>to</strong> three or four lines '<br />
; and in the<br />
fourth Book (on the number <strong>of</strong> points at which two conies