23.12.2012 Views

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Government will assess the offeror’s proposed Management approach for each of the functional areas contained<br />

in the PWS and in response to the applicable TOs for the quality of the proposed management solution to meet the<br />

Program and PWS objectives and minimum requirements within the specified constraints; understanding of GI<br />

Services program’s overall mission, objectives and requirements; the viability of and the extent to which the<br />

offeror’s approach will streamline processes resulting in greater effectiveness, and efficiencies in the support of the<br />

GI Services missions; and the inherent risk of the offeror’s proposed approach’s use of resources and solution and<br />

the likelihood of its success. All subfactors are of equal importance.<br />

M.3.2.1.1 Subfactor 1 - Management Plan: The offer will be evaluated to assess its approach to manage<br />

the tasks required under the PWS. The offeror should explain in detail its management approach to: managing<br />

all proposed subcontractors; controlling and reducing cost, managing all deliverables required by the PWS, and<br />

performing all tasks required by the PWS. In addition, offerors shall describe procedures that they will employ<br />

to avoid and/or mitigate, existing or potential conflicts of interests of its personnel and those of any proposed<br />

subcontractors or consultants. If no OCI currently exists, include a statement that no OCI currently exists.<br />

M.3.2.1.2 Subfactor 2 - Staffing Plan: The offer will be evaluated on the proposed approach to provide a<br />

fully qualified work force at contract award as well as the offeror’s demonstrated ability to recruit and retain<br />

sufficient numbers of trained personnel with required skill sets to support the GI Support Services requirements.<br />

The Plan will also be evaluated for its completeness regarding the technical qualifications, knowledge, and skills<br />

of proposed personnel and how well they correlate to the GI Support Services requirements of the PWS.<br />

M.3.2.1.3 Subfactor 3 – Risk Management Plan: The offer will be evaluated on the proposed approach<br />

to identify program risk and application of resources to mitigate, monitor, and close out risk elements in a<br />

disciplined and timely manner. Considerations for a complete risk management plan include the contractor’s risk<br />

management process, how risk management is implemented in the contractor’s organization, how risk management<br />

is integrated into the contractor’s systems engineering and program management processes, how risk management is<br />

implemented into the contractor’s program review process, risk management ground rules and assumptions used for<br />

risk assessment and handling, risk assessment methodology, and forms used in documenting risk identification,<br />

analysis, prioritization, handling and monitoring activities.<br />

M.3.2.1.4 Subfactor 4 - Transition Plan: The offer will be evaluated for the soundness of the offeror’s<br />

approach for a seamless transition between contracts and task orders and its proposed approach and execution to the<br />

transfer of tasks between contractors. The Plan will be evaluated for the offeror’s understanding of the <strong>Army</strong> and<br />

<strong>INSCOM</strong>’s operational environment and the thoroughness of its approach in addressing the planning and execution<br />

of transition issues, and how well it manages risk in this area. The offeror will be evaluated on its capability for<br />

attaining the transition performance objectives in the Performance Requirements Summary of the PWS.<br />

M.3.2.1.5 Subfactor 5 - Security Plan: The offer will be evaluated to determine the offeror’s understanding<br />

of, and its commitment to meeting, the security requirements of the proposed contract, including how the offeror will<br />

meet Government industrial, personnel, physical and information security standards.<br />

M.3.2.2 TECHNICAL APPROACH<br />

The Government will assess the offeror’s technical approach of the functional areas contained in the PWS and in<br />

response to the applicable Task Orders (TO) for the quality of the proposed technical approach to meet the Program<br />

and PWS objectives and minimum requirements within the specified constraints; understanding of GI Services<br />

program’s overall mission, objectives and requirements; the viability of and the extent to which the offeror’s<br />

approach will streamline processes resulting in greater effectiveness, and efficiencies in the support of the GI<br />

Services missions; and the inherent risk of the offeror’s proposed approach’s use of resources and solution and the<br />

likelihood of its success. All subfactors are of equal importance.<br />

M.3.2.2.1 Subfactor 1 – IDIQ Technical Approach: Offerors will be evaluated based upon their technical<br />

approach to performing the tasks described in the PWS.<br />

M.3.2.2.2 Subfactor 2 - TO 1 Technical Approach: Offerors will be evaluated based upon their technical<br />

approach to performing the tasks described in the PWS for applicable TOs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!