23.12.2012 Views

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

Global Intelligence Contract Draft RFP - INSCOM - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M.3.2.2.3 Subfactor 3 - TO 2 Technical Approach: Offerors will be evaluated based upon their technical<br />

approach to performing the tasks described in the PWS for applicable TOs.<br />

M.3.2.2.4 Subfactor 4 - TO 3 Technical Approach: Offerors will be evaluated based upon their technical<br />

approach to performing the tasks described in the PWS for applicable TOs.<br />

M.3.2.2.5 Subfactor 5 - Quality Control Plan (QCP) – (PWS and TO(s)): The QCPs will be evaluated<br />

relative to the degree in which the offeror can demonstrate its methodologies for ensuring sustained quality<br />

improvement. The offeror shall submit a QCP for measuring and attaining quality of performance under this<br />

contract. The offeror's QCPs will be evaluated as its approach for maintaining a quality control system that is<br />

integrated into the overall management approach and meets the requirements of the PWS and TO(s). Each QCP<br />

will be evaluated on how well it demonstrates a comprehensive, verifiable, and self-implementing approach for<br />

monitoring the offeror’s performance.<br />

M.3.2.3 PAST PERFORMANCE<br />

The offeror will be evaluated on the quality of past performance and demonstrate the ability to meet the<br />

requirements of this solicitation.<br />

M.3.2.3.1 Recent and Relevant<br />

The offeror will be evaluated on the recent and relevancy of the past performance accomplished by the offeror that<br />

are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the G.I. requirement.<br />

M.3.2.3.2 Performance Confidence<br />

The offeror’s past performance shall be evaluated on how well the offeror has performed on past contracts.<br />

Government will use various past performance information to evaluate this subfactor.<br />

M.3.2.4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION<br />

M.3.2.4.1 Small Business Participation Plan<br />

The Government will evaluate the extent of small business participation, as outlined in i-vi below, in terms of the<br />

percentage of total dollars that the offeror credibly proposes to subcontract or partner with other U.S. small business<br />

concerns (SB, SDB, WOSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZone SB, and/or HBCU/MIs) in the performance of the<br />

contract. For the purpose of this evaluation, the extent of prime offeror participation in the proposed contract<br />

performance, where the offeror is a U.S. small business concern, for the NAICS code of 541990 “All Other<br />

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” that is applicable to this solicitation, will also be considered small<br />

business participation.<br />

(i) The extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals;<br />

(ii) The extent of commitment to use such firms (for example, enforceable commitments are to be weighted<br />

more heavily than non-enforceable ones);<br />

(iii) The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;<br />

(iv) The realism of the proposal;<br />

(v) Past performance of the offeror in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization<br />

of Small Business Concerns, and;<br />

(vi) The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition.<br />

M.3.2.4.2 Small Business Subcontracting Plan<br />

Past performance of the offeror in complying with requirements of the clauses at 52.219-9 Small Business<br />

Subcontracting Plan (large businesses only);

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!