02.11.2021 Views

Crossing the Borders: New Methods and Techniques in the Study of Archaeological Materials from the Caribbean

by Corrine L. Hoffman, et. al.

by Corrine L. Hoffman, et. al.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 / Coppa et al.<br />

Table 14.2a. Frequencies <strong>of</strong> Traits Used <strong>and</strong> Dichotomic Break<strong>in</strong>g Po<strong>in</strong>ts for <strong>the</strong><br />

Maxillary Dentition.<br />

Dichotomy TIC RGR HIG FRC CIB<br />

I2 Shovel<strong>in</strong>g 3–7/0–7 % 70,6 100,0 66,7 84,1 57,1<br />

N 17 5 48 69 7<br />

I1 Double Shovel<strong>in</strong>g 2–6/0–6 % 52,9 77,8 88,2 93,2 60,0<br />

N 17 9 51 59 5<br />

I2 Double Shovel<strong>in</strong>g 2–6/0–6 % 50,0 100,0 55,8 68,2 50,0<br />

N 14 5 43 66 6<br />

I2 Interr. Groove 1/0–1 % 61,5 60,0 48,9 51,6 60,0<br />

N 13 5 45 64 5<br />

C Mesial Ridge 2–5/0–5 % 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,1 0,0<br />

N 14 6 47 89 8<br />

M1 Metacone 4–5/0–5 % 94,1 100,0 89,3 94,7 100,0<br />

N 51 19 84 170 25<br />

M2 Metacone 3.5–5/0–5 % 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 94,1<br />

N 48 17 74 119 17<br />

M3 Metacone 3–5/0–5 % 91,7 100,0 100,0 88,0 80,0<br />

N 36 11 44 50 5<br />

M1 Hypocone 4–5/0–5 % 95,1 86,7 96,0 86,4 88,5<br />

N 41 15 75 169 26<br />

M1 Cusp 5 1–5/0–5 % 7,1 25,0 30,3 27,2 42,9<br />

N 14 8 33 103 14<br />

M1 Carabelli’s Cusp 2–7/0–7 % 80,0 85,7 59,2 69,2 63,2<br />

N 15 7 49 143 19<br />

M1 Enamel Extension 2–3/0–3 % 20,0 20,0 50,9 51,1 25,0<br />

N 30 15 55 131 20<br />

M2 Enamel Extension 2–3/0–3 % 54,2 42,9 74,5 76,3 64,3<br />

N 24 14 51 93 14<br />

M1 Root Number 3/1–3 % 92,9 77,8 93,3 92,6 80,0<br />

N 14 9 45 81 10<br />

<strong>the</strong> adults for which <strong>the</strong> sex diagnosis was possible. No statistically significant differences<br />

(at <strong>the</strong> 0.05 probability level) between sexes were found. For this reason,<br />

frequency data are based on comb<strong>in</strong>ed observations.<br />

In order to evaluate <strong>the</strong> phenetic aff<strong>in</strong>ities between groups, multivariate analyses<br />

were applied on traits’ percent values (Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Component Analysis <strong>and</strong> Maximum<br />

Likelihood Method) (Felsenste<strong>in</strong> 1973), <strong>and</strong> on measures <strong>of</strong> distance (Mean<br />

Measure <strong>of</strong> Divergence <strong>and</strong> Multidimensional Scal<strong>in</strong>g). By us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong><br />

Maximum Likelihood we obta<strong>in</strong>ed a tree whose robustness was tested with by <strong>the</strong><br />

bootstrap technique (Felsenste<strong>in</strong> 1985). Bootstrap values are reported only when<br />

higher than 50 out <strong>of</strong> 100 replicates, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>se data are morphologic <strong>and</strong> not ge-<br />

You are read<strong>in</strong>g copyrighted material published by <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Alabama Press.<br />

Any post<strong>in</strong>g, copy<strong>in</strong>g, or distribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this work beyond fair use as def<strong>in</strong>ed under U.S. Copyright law is illegal <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>jures <strong>the</strong> author <strong>and</strong> publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Alabama Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!