16.05.2022 Views

Nasb-and-the-Nawasib

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Second Discussion

The Stance of the Abbasid Rulers 1

Despite the weakness that had befell the Umayyads in the last phase of their rule,

it was not possible for any group to eliminate them from power individually, as

was evident from the revolts of the Khawārij, some of the Alawids and others.

Hence the success of eliminating them was linked to having the capacity to fully

subdue the efforts of all the parties which resented the Umayyad Rule. This is

something that the forerunners of the Abbasid campaign had realised.

The best groups, who could help them in reaching their goals, were two: the

Shīʿah who hated the Umayyads and denounced their rule, and the Mawālī 2 many

among who resented the Umayyads and despised them. 3 However the primary

difference between the two groups was that the opposition of the Shīʿah for

the Umayyads (the Kaysāniyyah 4 specifically 5 ) was rooted in religion and thus

could not be altered due to it being rooted in faith and perception, as opposed to

the Mawālī whose opposition was rooted in social matters (which by nature are

susceptible to change), i.e. like the manner in which the dynasty treated them;

their enmity was thus lighter than the enmity of the Shīʿah in this sense.

1 In principle, the Abbasids should be part of the Ahl al-Bayt. However, the term Naṣb is specific

to stances regarding ʿAlī I and his children, to the exclusion of all else, as has been mentioned

already.

2 Freed Slaves.

3 The Umayyads were better than the Abbasids in general, in terms of treating their subjects well in

their worldly affairs and bringing their oppressors to justice. Hārūn al-Rashīd once asked Abū Bakr

ibn ʿAyyāsh, “Are we the best of rulers or the Umayyads?” He said, “They were of more benefit to the

people and you establish Ṣalāh more.” (Al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah 10/47).

4 One of the Shīʿah sects, the followers of Mukhtār ibn Abī ʿUbayd whose title was Kaysān according

to one view. They held the view that Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥanafiyyah was emphatically appointed as

the Imām and they believed in Badāʾ. They thereafter sub-divided into many groups. See: Firaq al-

Shīʿah p. 36; al-Farq bayn al-Firaq p. 27; al-Milal wa al-Niḥal 1/28, 147; Minhāj al-Sunnah 3/474.

5 Al-Khuḍrī: al-Dawlah al-ʿAbbāsiyyah p. 14.

352

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!