Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Instrument run logs;<br />
• Initial calibration data, raw <strong>and</strong> processed;<br />
• Continuing calibration data, raw <strong>and</strong> processed;<br />
• Raw data for all sample runs <strong>and</strong> QC runs;<br />
• Summary of method detection limit determination, showing the seven individual<br />
runs, their mean, <strong>and</strong> their st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation, but not including their raw data; <strong>and</strong><br />
• Surrogate spikes recoveries.<br />
Data qualifiers are applied to analytical results during the data usability assessment,<br />
based on adherence to method protocols <strong>and</strong> QA/QC limits.<br />
The validation guidelines are defined in Tables 8-1 <strong>and</strong> 8-2 <strong>and</strong> were developed in<br />
accordance with the National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (USEPA,<br />
1994a). Exp<strong>and</strong>ed criteria for the data usability guidelines were developed where<br />
professional judgment is recommended within the USEPA guidelines. QC guidelines are<br />
those specified in the analytical method protocols.<br />
8.3.2 Data Reporting Qualifiers<br />
The following definitions provide explanations of the USEPA (1994a) qualifiers to be<br />
assigned to analytical results during data validation, as defined in Table 8-1. The data<br />
qualifiers described are applied to <strong>org</strong>anic results.<br />
Qualifier Description<br />
The analyte was analyzed for <strong>and</strong> is not present above the reported sample<br />
U<br />
quantitation limit.<br />
J The analyte was analyzed for <strong>and</strong> was positively identified, but the<br />
associated numerical value may not be consistent with the amount actually<br />
present in the environmental sample. The data should be considered as a<br />
basis for decision making <strong>and</strong> are usable for many purposes.<br />
R The data are rejected as unusable for all purposes. The analyte was<br />
analyzed for, but the presence or absence of the analyte was not verified.<br />
Resampling <strong>and</strong> reanalysis are necessary to confirm the presence or<br />
absence of the analyte.<br />
UJ The analyte analyzed for was not present above the reported sample<br />
quantitation limit. The associated numerical value may not accurately or<br />
precisely represent the concentration necessary to detect the analyte in the<br />
sample.<br />
8.3.3 Assessment of Usability<br />
Data usability will be assessed by the project chemist based on validation results to<br />
determine the project PARCCs. The project chemist will perform data validation on at<br />
least ten percent of the data, selected at r<strong>and</strong>om. In addition, targeted data validation <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluation will be performed on any result that appears to be unusual or outside the<br />
expected range. Any limitations on data use will be expressed quantitatively to the extent<br />
practicable. The outcome of this data review will be a data set appropriate to support<br />
8-3<br />
K:\Depts\Dept48\LAUSD\MSA WORK\QAPP\Draft Final QAPP to DTSC\QAPP for OU 1 RAP.DOC<br />
319