Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LAUSD Proposed South Region High School #9 & Middle School #4 4.11.6 Medical Surveillance Programs and/or Monitoring 4-12 December 2006 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan (HASP) All personnel engaged in activities that results in the exposure to chemicals at or above the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or wear a respirator for more than 30 days in a year, must comply with 29 CFR 1910.120(f) – Medical Surveillance. All personnel who wear a respirator must be medically qualified by a physician, trained and fit-tested on an annual basis, even if they are not required to participate in a medical surveillance program under 29 CFR 1910.120(f). Based on the activities listed in Section 2.1, the following potential hazards or activities are associated with this project. As a result, medical surveillance will be required as listed below (Table 4-2): Table 4-2: Medical Surveillance Requirements Name/Job Classification Hazard/Activity Medical Surveillance/Training Josh Sacker/Field Team Lead Kristin Guthrie/Facility Safety Officer Fabrizio Mascioni/Field Team Member Daniel Saldana/Field Team Member Noise – Heavy Equipment Operation If noise exposures exceed 85 decibels over an 8-hour time weighted average, an employee must participate in a Hearing Conservation Program. NA Chemical exposures – NA If an employee is exposed at or above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of a chemical for more than 30 days in a year, they must participate in a Medical Surveillance Program. NA Respirator use – NA Medical qualification, training and fit-testing must be received on an annual basis. If a respirator is worn more than 30 days per year, participation in a Medical Surveillance Program is required. Gregory H. Beck, Safety Manager, (732) 537-3502 administers the medical surveillance program. 183
LAUSD Proposed South Region High School #9 & Middle School #4 5.0 PRE-FIELD WORK PHASE 5-1 December 2006 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan (HASP) 5.1 RISK ANALYSIS AND SAFETY SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT Procurement procedures require that a site-specific risk analysis be conducted before issuance of investigation and remediation RFPs. Using the pre-bid risk analysis checklist, the Project Manager leads this analysis, which documents existing exposures that may impact the work, surrounding facilities, equipment, workers, or the public at large. The analysis includes locating, documenting, and photographing items such as: • Overhead and underground power lines • Sewer and water utilities • Existing building interferences • Crane access ways • Traffic • Security • Fences • Water hazards • Existing geographical and environmental conditions • Investigation of Derived Waste (IDW) Disposal • Confined spaces Upon completion of the site risk analysis, high-risk activities are listed in the RFPs (as applicable), and bidders must describe controls and mitigation strategies in their proposals. The RFP notes that the list is representative and that the selected contractor must identify and control all work-related hazards. Pre-field work activities include a detailed analysis of the scope of work and safety specifications in the prime contract, Parsons’ project schedule and HASP, draft RFPs, and proposed subcontractor agreements. The Project’s standard safety specifications are given below. • Pre-Field Work Safety Meeting – Exhibit 5-1 • Site Specific Risk Review Checklist – Exhibit 5-2 5.2 DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION REVIEW Periodic remedial action reviews are held in accordance with the project management plan. The Project Safety Manager participates in the review to ensure that safety issues are adequately addressed. During the remedial action review, the discussion focuses on how work is sequenced, 184
Page 1 and 2:
126
Page 3 and 4:
128
Page 5 and 6:
130
Page 7 and 8: 132
Page 9 and 10: 134
Page 11 and 12: 136
Page 13 and 14: 138
Page 15 and 16: 140
Page 17 and 18: 142
Page 19 and 20: 144
Page 21 and 22: 146
Page 23 and 24: 148
Page 25 and 26: 150
Page 27 and 28: 152
Page 29 and 30: 154
Page 31 and 32: APPENDIX G Health and Safety Plan (
Page 33 and 34: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved
Page 35 and 36: LAUSD Proposed South Region High Sc
Page 49 and 50: • Fall Protection • Electrical
Page 53 and 54: 4.11.2 Substance Abuse and Alcohol
Page 55 and 56: Hospital Name St. Francis Medical C
Page 57: Personal Injury LAUSD Proposed Sout
Page 65 and 66: Date: Project or Location: Risk/Haz
Page 67 and 68: 6.1 SITE RISK ANALYSIS LAUSD Propos
Page 83 and 84: Project Name & Number: Location: Ex
Page 85 and 86: 6.4 SAFETY SYSTEMS ANALYSIS LAUSD P
Page 87 and 88: 6.7 SAFETY AND HEALTH ENFORCEMENT L
Page 89 and 90: Contractor Name: Address: Attention
Page 91 and 92: TABLE 6-1: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OF
Page 93 and 94: TABLE 6-1: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OF
Page 95 and 96: Name of Trainer: Training Subject:
Page 105 and 106: 10.1.3 Level C Protection LAUSD Pro
Page 107 and 108: Action levels for potential benzene
Page 109 and 110:
LAUSD Proposed South Region High Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
N Exhibit 12-1 SITE CONTROL ZONES P
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
14.3 SPILL REPORTING PROCEDURES LAU
Page 121 and 122:
EMERGENCY CONTACTS In the event of
Page 123 and 124:
PARSONS - LAUSD Procedures followin
Page 125 and 126:
Site-Specific Health and Safety Pla
Page 127 and 128:
ATTACHMENT 3 ACTIVITY HAZARD ANALYS
Page 129 and 130:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis O
Page 131 and 132:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis F
Page 133 and 134:
Project Name & Number: LAUSD South
Page 135 and 136:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis G
Page 137 and 138:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis G
Page 139 and 140:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis D
Page 141 and 142:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis D
Page 143 and 144:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis H
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
APPENDIX H Quality Assurance Projec
Page 157 and 158:
new wells and from about 70 previou
Page 159 and 160:
• Los Angeles Unified School Dist
Page 161 and 162:
SECTION 2 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES T
Page 163 and 164:
precision range from zero to the hi
Page 165 and 166:
• Use of appropriate sampling pro
Page 167 and 168:
Table 2-1 Requirements for Containe
Page 169 and 170:
SECTION 3 FIELD DATA REDUCTION, VAL
Page 171 and 172:
3.4 FIELD DATA VALIDATION The Proje
Page 173 and 174:
SECTION 5 SAMPLING PROTOCOLS Detail
Page 175 and 176:
FM before sending any samples origi
Page 177 and 178:
SECTION 6 FIXED-BASE LABORATORY ANA
Page 179 and 180:
the reported SQLs take into account
Page 181 and 182:
Table 6-2 Practical Quantitation Li
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Table 6-3 Comparison of Field and F
Page 191 and 192:
SECTION 7 LABORATORY QC SAMPLES AND
Page 193 and 194:
Continuing calibrations shall be co
Page 195 and 196:
project-specific DQOs. A DQA will b
Page 197 and 198:
Table 8-1 Flagging Conventions for
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
SECTION 9 QA REPORTS At monthly int
Page 205 and 206:
Laboratory project management and s
Page 207 and 208:
SECTION 12 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE A
Page 209 and 210:
SECTION 14 DATA DELIVERABLES The de
Page 211 and 212:
Table 14-1 Required Laboratory Deli
Page 213 and 214:
SECTION 16 SUBCONTRACT LABORATORY S
Page 215 and 216:
APPENDIX A COLUMN TEST FOR DETERMIN
Page 217 and 218:
specific gravity of 1 for water, th
Page 219 and 220:
APPENDIX I Transportation Managemen
Page 221 and 222:
Prepared by PARSONS 100 WEST WALNUT
Page 223 and 224:
emoval of impacted soils. Waste tra
Page 225 and 226:
Trucks entering the receiving facil
Page 227 and 228:
Communication Truck drivers will ha
Page 234 and 235:
Table J-1 South Region High School
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM DTSC DAT
Page 242 and 243:
(9/3/08) RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM
Page 244 and 245:
(9/3/08) between 033-PC-064 and -06
Page 246 and 247:
(9/3/08) 5 Page 7-13, Section 7.5.2
Page 248 and 249:
Internal Review Draft (9/8/08) exce
Page 250 and 251:
Internal Review Draft (9/8/08) 7 A
Page 252 and 253:
OPERABLE UNIT (OU) 1 HAZARDOUS WAST
Page 254 and 255:
Sample Location Sample Date Sample
Page 257 and 258:
APPENDIX M List of Potentially Resp
show all

Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?