Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Instrument run logs; • Initial calibration data, raw and processed; • Continuing calibration data, raw and processed; • Raw data for all sample runs and QC runs; • Summary of method detection limit determination, showing the seven individual runs, their mean, and their standard deviation, but not including their raw data; and • Surrogate spikes recoveries. Data qualifiers are applied to analytical results during the data usability assessment, based on adherence to method protocols and QA/QC limits. The validation guidelines are defined in Tables 8-1 and 8-2 and were developed in accordance with the National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (USEPA, 1994a). Expanded criteria for the data usability guidelines were developed where professional judgment is recommended within the USEPA guidelines. QC guidelines are those specified in the analytical method protocols. 8.3.2 Data Reporting Qualifiers The following definitions provide explanations of the USEPA (1994a) qualifiers to be assigned to analytical results during data validation, as defined in Table 8-1. The data qualifiers described are applied to organic results. Qualifier Description The analyte was analyzed for and is not present above the reported sample U quantitation limit. J The analyte was analyzed for and was positively identified, but the associated numerical value may not be consistent with the amount actually present in the environmental sample. The data should be considered as a basis for decision making and are usable for many purposes. R The data are rejected as unusable for all purposes. The analyte was analyzed for, but the presence or absence of the analyte was not verified. Resampling and reanalysis are necessary to confirm the presence or absence of the analyte. UJ The analyte analyzed for was not present above the reported sample quantitation limit. The associated numerical value may not accurately or precisely represent the concentration necessary to detect the analyte in the sample. 8.3.3 Assessment of Usability Data usability will be assessed by the project chemist based on validation results to determine the project PARCCs. The project chemist will perform data validation on at least ten percent of the data, selected at random. In addition, targeted data validation and evaluation will be performed on any result that appears to be unusual or outside the expected range. Any limitations on data use will be expressed quantitatively to the extent practicable. The outcome of this data review will be a data set appropriate to support 8-3 K:\Depts\Dept48\LAUSD\MSA WORK\QAPP\Draft Final QAPP to DTSC\QAPP for OU 1 RAP.DOC 319
project-specific DQOs. A DQA will be written, summarizing the findings of the data review, and providing an assessment of overall data quality and usability. 8-4 K:\Depts\Dept48\LAUSD\MSA WORK\QAPP\Draft Final QAPP to DTSC\QAPP for OU 1 RAP.DOC 320
Page 1 and 2:
126
Page 3 and 4:
128
Page 5 and 6:
130
Page 7 and 8:
132
Page 9 and 10:
134
Page 11 and 12:
136
Page 13 and 14:
138
Page 15 and 16:
140
Page 17 and 18:
142
Page 19 and 20:
144
Page 21 and 22:
146
Page 23 and 24:
148
Page 25 and 26:
150
Page 27 and 28:
152
Page 29 and 30:
154
Page 31 and 32:
APPENDIX G Health and Safety Plan (
Page 33 and 34:
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved
Page 35 and 36:
LAUSD Proposed South Region High Sc
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
• Fall Protection • Electrical
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
4.11.2 Substance Abuse and Alcohol
Page 55 and 56:
Hospital Name St. Francis Medical C
Page 57 and 58:
Personal Injury LAUSD Proposed Sout
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Date: Project or Location: Risk/Haz
Page 67 and 68:
6.1 SITE RISK ANALYSIS LAUSD Propos
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Project Name & Number: Location: Ex
Page 85 and 86:
6.4 SAFETY SYSTEMS ANALYSIS LAUSD P
Page 87 and 88:
6.7 SAFETY AND HEALTH ENFORCEMENT L
Page 89 and 90:
Contractor Name: Address: Attention
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 6-1: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OF
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 6-1: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OF
Page 95 and 96:
Name of Trainer: Training Subject:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
10.1.3 Level C Protection LAUSD Pro
Page 107 and 108:
Action levels for potential benzene
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
N Exhibit 12-1 SITE CONTROL ZONES P
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
14.3 SPILL REPORTING PROCEDURES LAU
Page 121 and 122:
EMERGENCY CONTACTS In the event of
Page 123 and 124:
PARSONS - LAUSD Procedures followin
Page 125 and 126:
Site-Specific Health and Safety Pla
Page 127 and 128:
ATTACHMENT 3 ACTIVITY HAZARD ANALYS
Page 129 and 130:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis O
Page 131 and 132:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis F
Page 133 and 134:
Project Name & Number: LAUSD South
Page 135 and 136:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis G
Page 137 and 138:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis G
Page 139 and 140:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis D
Page 141 and 142:
Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis D
Page 143 and 144: Parsons Activity Hazards Analysis H
Page 155 and 156: APPENDIX H Quality Assurance Projec
Page 157 and 158: new wells and from about 70 previou
Page 159 and 160: • Los Angeles Unified School Dist
Page 161 and 162: SECTION 2 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES T
Page 163 and 164: precision range from zero to the hi
Page 165 and 166: • Use of appropriate sampling pro
Page 167 and 168: Table 2-1 Requirements for Containe
Page 169 and 170: SECTION 3 FIELD DATA REDUCTION, VAL
Page 171 and 172: 3.4 FIELD DATA VALIDATION The Proje
Page 173 and 174: SECTION 5 SAMPLING PROTOCOLS Detail
Page 175 and 176: FM before sending any samples origi
Page 177 and 178: SECTION 6 FIXED-BASE LABORATORY ANA
Page 179 and 180: the reported SQLs take into account
Page 181 and 182: Table 6-2 Practical Quantitation Li
Page 189 and 190: Table 6-3 Comparison of Field and F
Page 191 and 192: SECTION 7 LABORATORY QC SAMPLES AND
Page 193: Continuing calibrations shall be co
Page 197 and 198: Table 8-1 Flagging Conventions for
Page 203 and 204: SECTION 9 QA REPORTS At monthly int
Page 205 and 206: Laboratory project management and s
Page 207 and 208: SECTION 12 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE A
Page 209 and 210: SECTION 14 DATA DELIVERABLES The de
Page 211 and 212: Table 14-1 Required Laboratory Deli
Page 213 and 214: SECTION 16 SUBCONTRACT LABORATORY S
Page 215 and 216: APPENDIX A COLUMN TEST FOR DETERMIN
Page 217 and 218: specific gravity of 1 for water, th
Page 219 and 220: APPENDIX I Transportation Managemen
Page 221 and 222: Prepared by PARSONS 100 WEST WALNUT
Page 223 and 224: emoval of impacted soils. Waste tra
Page 225 and 226: Trucks entering the receiving facil
Page 227 and 228: Communication Truck drivers will ha
Page 234 and 235: Table J-1 South Region High School
Page 240 and 241: RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM DTSC DAT
Page 242 and 243: (9/3/08) RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM
Page 244 and 245:
(9/3/08) between 033-PC-064 and -06
Page 246 and 247:
(9/3/08) 5 Page 7-13, Section 7.5.2
Page 248 and 249:
Internal Review Draft (9/8/08) exce
Page 250 and 251:
Internal Review Draft (9/8/08) 7 A
Page 252 and 253:
OPERABLE UNIT (OU) 1 HAZARDOUS WAST
Page 254 and 255:
Sample Location Sample Date Sample
Page 257 and 258:
APPENDIX M List of Potentially Resp
show all

Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) - Laschools.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?