Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
94 Ã Ë reconstruction and efficiency studies<br />
2<br />
1.75<br />
1.5<br />
1.25<br />
1<br />
0.75<br />
0.5<br />
0.25<br />
0<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />
b1 sample: red dots with 1Gev cut<br />
2.25<br />
2<br />
1.75<br />
1.5<br />
1.25<br />
1<br />
0.75<br />
0.5<br />
0.25<br />
0<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />
b2 sample: red dots with 1Gev cut<br />
Figure 3-14. Values of the Ã Ë efficiency corrections for block 1 (left) and block 2 (right) data. The red dots<br />
represent the corrections with the 1GeV momentum cut, while the black one are the values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />
no momentum-cut sample.<br />
x 10 2<br />
9000<br />
8000<br />
7000<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
649.7 / 52<br />
P1 0.9459E+06 1729.<br />
P2 -0.7791E+06 3422.<br />
P3 0.1727E+07 5209.<br />
P4 0.4968 0.5849E-04<br />
P5 0.7816E-02 0.9534E-04<br />
P6 0.4107 0.4304E-02<br />
P7 0.4974 0.7716E-05<br />
P8 0.2472E-02 0.1094E-04<br />
0.46 0.48 0.5 0.52 0.54<br />
Figure 3-15. Ã Ë candidate <strong>in</strong>variant mass <strong>in</strong> Run 2 on-resonance data. The superimposed curve is the<br />
result of the fit with a double Gaussian and a l<strong>in</strong>ear background.<br />
MARCELLA BONA
Change language