Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.6 Analysis methods 119<br />
θ c radians<br />
0.85<br />
0.825<br />
0.8<br />
0.775<br />
B A B AR<br />
π<br />
K<br />
2 3 4 5<br />
p GeV/c<br />
Number of σ separation<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
b)<br />
BABAR<br />
2 2.5 3 3.5 4<br />
K-π separation versus p GeV/c<br />
Figure 4-14. The � ��Ö�Ò�ÓÚ angle (a) and Ö� separation (b) as functions of momentum for tracks <strong>in</strong> the<br />
� control sample. Both tracks must be <strong>in</strong> the same momentum b<strong>in</strong> to achieve a given � separation. Tracks<br />
below the dashed l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> (a) are rejected as proton candidates.<br />
kaon(pion) tracks and has a width three times that of the primary peak. Left plots <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4-13 display<br />
the quantity � � for kaon tracks <strong>in</strong> four representative momentum b<strong>in</strong>s. Overlayed on the distributions<br />
are the results of the double Gaussian fits to both the primary peaks and the satellite peaks. No significant<br />
momentum or Ó× � dependence is observed. The effect is present <strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo simulated decays at a<br />
somewhat smaller level (� ).<br />
The satellite peak is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the � PDFs as a second Gaussian with width and relative area fixed to the<br />
values described above, and centered at the opposite particle hypothesis. As will be demonstrated later, the<br />
presence of these satellite peaks has a very small effect on the fit results.<br />
The � measurements for pions and kaons <strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo simulated � � � � decays have been<br />
compared with those derived from the Monte Carlo � £ control sample and good agreement is found.<br />
This validates the use of the � £ decays <strong>in</strong> the data as a means of parameteriz<strong>in</strong>g the � resolutions and<br />
offsets for the signal samples.<br />
4.6.6 Correlations between PDFs<br />
The PDFs described <strong>in</strong> the previous sections are assumed to be uncorrelated <strong>in</strong> the maximum likelihood fit.<br />
To check this assumption, <strong>in</strong> each decay mode, the l<strong>in</strong>ear correlation coefficient �� between the PDFs for<br />
STRATEGY AND TOOLS FOR CHARMLESS TWO-BODY � DECAYS ANALYSIS