28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.6 Analysis methods 119<br />

θ c radians<br />

0.85<br />

0.825<br />

0.8<br />

0.775<br />

B A B AR<br />

π<br />

K<br />

2 3 4 5<br />

p GeV/c<br />

Number of σ separation<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

b)<br />

BABAR<br />

2 2.5 3 3.5 4<br />

K-π separation versus p GeV/c<br />

Figure 4-14. The � ��Ö�Ò�ÓÚ angle (a) and Ö� separation (b) as functions of momentum for tracks <strong>in</strong> the<br />

� control sample. Both tracks must be <strong>in</strong> the same momentum b<strong>in</strong> to achieve a given � separation. Tracks<br />

below the dashed l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> (a) are rejected as proton candidates.<br />

kaon(pion) tracks and has a width three times that of the primary peak. Left plots <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4-13 display<br />

the quantity � � for kaon tracks <strong>in</strong> four representative momentum b<strong>in</strong>s. Overlayed on the distributions<br />

are the results of the double Gaussian fits to both the primary peaks and the satellite peaks. No significant<br />

momentum or Ó× � dependence is observed. The effect is present <strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo simulated decays at a<br />

somewhat smaller level (� ).<br />

The satellite peak is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the � PDFs as a second Gaussian with width and relative area fixed to the<br />

values described above, and centered at the opposite particle hypothesis. As will be demonstrated later, the<br />

presence of these satellite peaks has a very small effect on the fit results.<br />

The � measurements for pions and kaons <strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo simulated � � � � decays have been<br />

compared with those derived from the Monte Carlo � £ control sample and good agreement is found.<br />

This validates the use of the � £ decays <strong>in</strong> the data as a means of parameteriz<strong>in</strong>g the � resolutions and<br />

offsets for the signal samples.<br />

4.6.6 Correlations between PDFs<br />

The PDFs described <strong>in</strong> the previous sections are assumed to be uncorrelated <strong>in</strong> the maximum likelihood fit.<br />

To check this assumption, <strong>in</strong> each decay mode, the l<strong>in</strong>ear correlation coefficient �� between the PDFs for<br />

STRATEGY AND TOOLS FOR CHARMLESS TWO-BODY � DECAYS ANALYSIS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!