28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.5 Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of « 39<br />

Assum<strong>in</strong>g negligible the pengu<strong>in</strong>s contributions, the previous method can be used to extract the angle «<br />

through measurements of decays of � Ô�Ý× Ø and � Ô�Ý× Ø to f<strong>in</strong>al states like � � or � � . When<br />

pengu<strong>in</strong>s are not negligible, this method measures a quantity, denoted «�«, which differs from the true<br />

« by the unknown amount �� � . This quantity is mode-dependent because it depends on the ratio of treedom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

to pengu<strong>in</strong>-only contributions.<br />

1.5.2 Extraction of « <strong>in</strong> the Presence of Pengu<strong>in</strong>s<br />

In most of the decays modes, more than one amplitude is present and <strong>in</strong> the expression of the total amplitude,<br />

contributions from tree or pengu<strong>in</strong> diagrams can be split: <strong>in</strong> the particular case of the channels of <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

here, the weak phase difference between these terms is «.<br />

Go<strong>in</strong>g back to the case of a f<strong>in</strong>al state � be<strong>in</strong>g a �È eigenstate, we can factorize the decay amplitudes:<br />

� � � ��È ����È �Ì���Ì � �ÆÌ È� ��È � �ÆÈ<br />

� � � ��È ����È �Ì� ��Ì � �ÆÌ È� ��È � �ÆÈ (1.69)<br />

where Ì , �Ì and ÆÌ (È , �È and ÆÈ ) are the magnitude, the weak phase and the strong phase of the treedom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

(pengu<strong>in</strong>-only) amplitude.<br />

Thus, assum<strong>in</strong>g the presence of pengu<strong>in</strong> contributions, if �Ì �� �È , ���È (Eq. 1.22) becomes a function of<br />

tree and pengu<strong>in</strong> diagram parameters and as a consequence it does not corresponds to a clean measure of<br />

the CKM phase. The presence of non-negligible pengu<strong>in</strong> contributions also leads to direct �È violation (see<br />

Sec. 1.5.3), that is ����È � �� . In the presence of direct �È violation, the time-dependent �È asymmetry<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s a Ó× ¡Ñ�Ø term, the coefficient of which can also be measured. In case the strong phases are<br />

equal, ÆÌ � ÆÈ , then ���È is a pure phase (i.e., ����È � � ) and so no direct �È violation is present.<br />

However, like <strong>in</strong> the previous case, this phase depends on both tree and pengu<strong>in</strong> parameters, so that there is<br />

still a shift <strong>in</strong> « due to pengu<strong>in</strong> contributions, even though there is no direct �È violation.<br />

The method to separate the tree and pengu<strong>in</strong> contributions is isosp<strong>in</strong> analysis. Isosp<strong>in</strong> amplitudes Á¡Á�Á�<br />

can be labeled by the ¡Á value of the �-quark decay and by the Á� of the f<strong>in</strong>al state, which <strong>in</strong>cludes the<br />

spectator quark. A gluon is pure Á � , so that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant gluonic � � � pengu<strong>in</strong> diagrams are pure<br />

¡Á � . On the other hand, the tree-level � � ÙÙ� decays have both ¡Á � and ¡Á � components. If<br />

the ¡Á � part can be isolated, then the tree contribution, which conta<strong>in</strong>s the weak phase to be measured,<br />

can be isolated. The <strong>in</strong>clusion of the spectator quark gives the f<strong>in</strong>al isosp<strong>in</strong> value of or for the gluonic<br />

pengu<strong>in</strong> contributions, but , or for the tree contributions. The same arguments apply to � � × pengu<strong>in</strong>s<br />

and � � ÙÙ× tree amplitudes.<br />

Table 1-2 lists the isosp<strong>in</strong> amplitudes for all relevant channels for these states. Note that, <strong>in</strong> all cases, there is<br />

at least one isosp<strong>in</strong> amplitude which can be reached only via tree diagrams: � � � for � � �� and � � �<br />

for � � �Ã. Isolation of such isosp<strong>in</strong> amplitudes allows the removal of pengu<strong>in</strong> pollution.<br />

�È VIOLATION IN THE �� SYSTEM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!