28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

�È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the �� System<br />

�È symmetry violation is an expected consequence of the Standard Model with three quark generations<br />

(see Sec. 1.4.1): as a matter of fact, the �È violation that shows up <strong>in</strong> a small fraction of weak decays is<br />

accommodated simply <strong>in</strong> the three-generation Standard Model Lagrangian. All it requires is that �È is not<br />

imposed as a symmetry.<br />

Some experiments have proved that �È violation occurs <strong>in</strong> neutral à decays [1], The Ã-decay observations,<br />

together with other measurements, place constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the parameters of the Standard Model mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix<br />

(the �ÃÅ matrix [2, 3]) but do not yet provide any test about whether the pattern of �È violation predicted<br />

by the m<strong>in</strong>imal Standard Model is the one found <strong>in</strong> nature. A multitude of �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g effects are expected<br />

<strong>in</strong> � decays, some of which are very cleanly predicted by the Standard Model.<br />

If enough <strong>in</strong>dependent observations of �È violation <strong>in</strong> � decays can be made then it will be possible to test<br />

the Standard Model predictions for �È violation. Either the relationships between various measurements<br />

will be consistent with the Standard Model predictions and fully determ<strong>in</strong>e the �ÃÅ parameters or there<br />

will be no s<strong>in</strong>gle choice of �ÃÅ parameters that is consistent with all measurements. This latter case would<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that there is a contribution of physics beyond the Standard Model: so the ma<strong>in</strong> goal for the BABAR<br />

experiment is to measure enough quantities to impose redundant constra<strong>in</strong>ts on Standard Model parameters,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g particularly the convention-<strong>in</strong>dependent comb<strong>in</strong>ations of �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g phases of �ÃÅ matrix<br />

elements.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the Standard Model accommodates �È -violation, no extension of the Standard Model can be �È -<br />

conserv<strong>in</strong>g and thus many extensions have additional sources of �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g effects, or effects which<br />

change the relationship of the measurable quantities to the �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g parameters of the Standard Model:<br />

� Factories like BABAR can play an important role <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g most of these parameters.<br />

1.1 È , � and Ì symmetries<br />

The fundamental po<strong>in</strong>t is that �È symmetry is broken <strong>in</strong> any theory that has complex coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Lagrangian which cannot be removed by any choice of phase redef<strong>in</strong>ition of the fields <strong>in</strong> the theory.<br />

Three discrete operations are potential symmetries of a field theory Lagrangian [9]: two of them, parity<br />

and time reversal are space-time symmetries. Parity, denoted by È , sends Ø� Ü � Ø� Ü , revers<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

handedness of space. Time reversal, denoted by Ì , sends Ø� Ü � Ø� Ü , <strong>in</strong>terchang<strong>in</strong>g the forward<br />

and backward light-cones. A third (non-space-time) discrete operation is charge conjugation, denoted by<br />

�. This operation <strong>in</strong>terchanges particles and anti-particles. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation �È replaces a particle by its<br />

anti-particle and reverses momentum and helicity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!