Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.2 Neutral � Mesons 19<br />
given time (Ø� � Ø�): <strong>in</strong> this case (a particle-anti-particle state), È and � transformations correspond to the<br />
same one. As a matter of fact, through parity � �� � goes to � � �� � � and therefore the state<br />
� �� � � � �� � � � �� � � � �� � � results <strong>in</strong> a spatially anti-symmetric one. As a<br />
consequence, the spatial contribution com<strong>in</strong>g from the Ä � condition <strong>in</strong> the spherical functions � Ñ<br />
� must<br />
result symmetric: ×�Ò � has been <strong>in</strong>cluded. On the other hand, by apply<strong>in</strong>g �, � �� � goes <strong>in</strong>to � �� �<br />
so that the state <strong>in</strong> the Eq. 1.27 is asymmetric for particle-antiparticle exchange as requested by the negative<br />
� eigenvalue of the § �Ë .<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the coherent time evolution of the two particles can be treated like a s<strong>in</strong>gle particle evolution, <strong>in</strong><br />
equations 1.24 and 1.25 one can substitute<br />
� Ø��� � � Ô�Ý× Ø���<br />
� Ø��� � � Ô�Ý× Ø��� �<br />
After this substitution, Eq. 1.27 can be written extract<strong>in</strong>g the time dependence (and us<strong>in</strong>g addiction and<br />
subtraction trigonometric rules):<br />
Ë Ø� �Ø� � Ô �<br />
�Š� �<br />
� ¡Ñ� Ø� Ø�<br />
�×�Ò<br />
�� Ô<br />
Õ���� Ò � ¡Ñ� Ø� Ø�<br />
Ó×<br />
�� �<br />
���� ���� Õ<br />
Ô��� �Ó<br />
� ×�Ò �� � (1.28)<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the �’s have equal (though back-to-back) momenta <strong>in</strong> the center-of-mass frame, before the decay of<br />
the first of the two �’s, Ø� is equal to Ø� and Eq. 1.28 conta<strong>in</strong>s one � and one � . However decay stops the<br />
clock for the decayed particle so the terms that depend on ×�Ò�¡Ñ� Ø� Ø� � ℄ beg<strong>in</strong> to play a role. From<br />
Eq. 1.28 one can derive the amplitude for decays where one of the two �’s decays to any state � at time Ø<br />
and the other decays to � at time Ø :<br />
� Ø �Ø � Ô �<br />
�Å Ø Ø � Ø �Ø<br />
�×�Ò<br />
�<br />
¡Ñ� Ø Ø �� Ô<br />
� � Õ<br />
Ò �<br />
¡Ñ� Ø Ø<br />
Ó×<br />
�� � � � �<br />
Õ<br />
� � Ô<br />
�<br />
�Ó ×�Ò � � (1.29)<br />
where �� is the amplitude for a � to decay to the state ��, �� is the amplitude for a � to decay to the same<br />
state �� (see Eqs. 1.20). To keep signs consistent with Eq. 1.28, the symbol<br />
� Ø �Ø �<br />
�<br />
Ø � Ø� � Ø � Ø�,<br />
Ø � Ø�� Ø � Ø�<br />
is <strong>in</strong>troduced, but this overall sign factor will disappear <strong>in</strong> the rate. Any state that identifies the flavor of the<br />
parent � (tagg<strong>in</strong>g) has either �� or �� � . In Eq. 1.29, the sum � � rema<strong>in</strong>s only <strong>in</strong> the factorized<br />
exponential and is vanished from ×�Ò� or Ó×�Ò� arguments.<br />
�È VIOLATION IN THE �� SYSTEM