28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5 Track<strong>in</strong>g Corrections 111<br />

Ë�Ð� ØÓÖ ¯ ��� ¯ ��� ¯ ��� ¯ ���<br />

SMS(Loose) 89.0¦0.4 6.3¦0.3 11.0¦0.3 93.7¦0.4<br />

Table 4-4. Selector efficiencies for a s<strong>in</strong>gle track with<strong>in</strong> the �ÁÊ� acceptance.<br />

With exception of �-momentum correlation, the efficiency shows no significant � angle dependence for high<br />

momenta. The fall <strong>in</strong> efficiency for low momenta vertical tracks almost disappears above ����� (see<br />

the right plots <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4-8).<br />

4.5 Track<strong>in</strong>g Corrections<br />

The difference <strong>in</strong> track reconstruction efficiency between data and Monte Carlo simulated events is taken<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account by follow<strong>in</strong>g the standard procedure outl<strong>in</strong>ed by the BABAR Track<strong>in</strong>g Efficiency Task Force [52].<br />

Look-up tables are used to scale the reconstruction efficiency for each track <strong>in</strong> the Monte Carlo sample. The<br />

scale factors are functions of the ÔØ, polar and azimuthal angles of the track, as well as the track multiplicity<br />

of the event. The overall correction factor to the efficiency is estimated on a mode by mode basis.<br />

4.6 Analysis methods<br />

The analyses are based on an unb<strong>in</strong>ned maximum likelihood fit to determ<strong>in</strong>e from the data yields and<br />

asymmetries. The signal yields are divided by the efficiency estimates and by the number of neutral �<br />

mesons produced <strong>in</strong> the data-set <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> branch<strong>in</strong>g ratio measurements.<br />

The distributions for Ñ�Ë, ¡� and � provide good discrim<strong>in</strong>ation between signal and background, while<br />

the use of the � ��Ö�Ò�ÓÚ angles, � allows the fitter to measure the particle ID content of the � candidates.<br />

The quantity ¡� provides additional separation power between signal modes which differ for PID contents<br />

of their f<strong>in</strong>al states.<br />

The likelihood, Ä, for a given candidate � is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by summ<strong>in</strong>g the product of event yield Ò� and<br />

probability � over all possible signal and background hypotheses �. The � are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the extended likelihood function Ä<br />

Ä � � È Å<br />

�� �<br />

�<br />

� �<br />

��<br />

��<br />

Ò�È� � Ü �� � « �<br />

where È� � Ü �� � « � is the probability for candidate � to belong to category � (of Å total categories),<br />

based on its characteriz<strong>in</strong>g variables � Ü � and parameters � « � that describe the expected distributions of<br />

these variables. The probabilities È� � Ü �� � « � are evaluated as the product of probability density functions<br />

(PDFs) for each of the <strong>in</strong>dependent variables � Ü �, given the set of parameters � « �:<br />

È� � È Ñ�Ë<br />

� È ¡�<br />

� � � �<br />

�<br />

�<br />

(4.8)<br />

� (4.9)<br />

STRATEGY AND TOOLS FOR CHARMLESS TWO-BODY � DECAYS ANALYSIS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!