Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.5 Track<strong>in</strong>g Corrections 111<br />
Ë�Ð� ØÓÖ ¯ ��� ¯ ��� ¯ ��� ¯ ���<br />
SMS(Loose) 89.0¦0.4 6.3¦0.3 11.0¦0.3 93.7¦0.4<br />
Table 4-4. Selector efficiencies for a s<strong>in</strong>gle track with<strong>in</strong> the �ÁÊ� acceptance.<br />
With exception of �-momentum correlation, the efficiency shows no significant � angle dependence for high<br />
momenta. The fall <strong>in</strong> efficiency for low momenta vertical tracks almost disappears above ����� (see<br />
the right plots <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4-8).<br />
4.5 Track<strong>in</strong>g Corrections<br />
The difference <strong>in</strong> track reconstruction efficiency between data and Monte Carlo simulated events is taken<br />
<strong>in</strong>to account by follow<strong>in</strong>g the standard procedure outl<strong>in</strong>ed by the BABAR Track<strong>in</strong>g Efficiency Task Force [52].<br />
Look-up tables are used to scale the reconstruction efficiency for each track <strong>in</strong> the Monte Carlo sample. The<br />
scale factors are functions of the ÔØ, polar and azimuthal angles of the track, as well as the track multiplicity<br />
of the event. The overall correction factor to the efficiency is estimated on a mode by mode basis.<br />
4.6 Analysis methods<br />
The analyses are based on an unb<strong>in</strong>ned maximum likelihood fit to determ<strong>in</strong>e from the data yields and<br />
asymmetries. The signal yields are divided by the efficiency estimates and by the number of neutral �<br />
mesons produced <strong>in</strong> the data-set <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> branch<strong>in</strong>g ratio measurements.<br />
The distributions for Ñ�Ë, ¡� and � provide good discrim<strong>in</strong>ation between signal and background, while<br />
the use of the � ��Ö�Ò�ÓÚ angles, � allows the fitter to measure the particle ID content of the � candidates.<br />
The quantity ¡� provides additional separation power between signal modes which differ for PID contents<br />
of their f<strong>in</strong>al states.<br />
The likelihood, Ä, for a given candidate � is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by summ<strong>in</strong>g the product of event yield Ò� and<br />
probability � over all possible signal and background hypotheses �. The � are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the extended likelihood function Ä<br />
Ä � � È Å<br />
�� �<br />
�<br />
� �<br />
��<br />
��<br />
Ò�È� � Ü �� � « �<br />
where È� � Ü �� � « � is the probability for candidate � to belong to category � (of Å total categories),<br />
based on its characteriz<strong>in</strong>g variables � Ü � and parameters � « � that describe the expected distributions of<br />
these variables. The probabilities È� � Ü �� � « � are evaluated as the product of probability density functions<br />
(PDFs) for each of the <strong>in</strong>dependent variables � Ü �, given the set of parameters � « �:<br />
È� � È Ñ�Ë<br />
� È ¡�<br />
� � � �<br />
�<br />
�<br />
(4.8)<br />
� (4.9)<br />
STRATEGY AND TOOLS FOR CHARMLESS TWO-BODY � DECAYS ANALYSIS