28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

98 Strategy and Tools for Charmless Two-body � Decays Analysis<br />

¯ 10.1 million events (���� fb ) ÙÙ, �� and ×× Monte Carlo<br />

¯ 6.2 million events (���� fb ) Monte Carlo<br />

¯ 4.0 million events (�� fb ) � � Monte Carlo<br />

¯ 0.94 million events ( � fb ) generic � charmless Monte Carlo<br />

¯ �k events of each signal Monte Carlo sample<br />

The � � � � and � � £ � decays have also been analyzed for control sample studies. All cuts<br />

are tuned us<strong>in</strong>g Monte Carlo simulation and off-resonance data samples together with the sidebands of the<br />

on-resonance data. Cuts were def<strong>in</strong>ed before analyz<strong>in</strong>g the signal band of the on-resonance data-set (bl<strong>in</strong>d<br />

analysis).<br />

4.2 Event selection<br />

The preselection is done check<strong>in</strong>g the value of a number of tagbits based on some event variables: each<br />

event should pass the so called BGFMultiHadron selection which consists of requir<strong>in</strong>g at least 3 charged<br />

tracks and Ê � ��� (see Eq. (4.4) for the def<strong>in</strong>ition of this variable).<br />

Then, a specific selector has been studied to set a tagbit (named TagTwoBody) for a very efficient exclusive<br />

selection of charmless twobody B decays. It is designed to look separately for � � , � ¦ Ã Ë, � � ¦ ,<br />

� � , � Ã Ë and Ã Ë Ã Ë , selected among the charged tracks and the Ã Ë candidates reconstructed with<br />

loose criteria (see Sec. 3.1.1). For this selector we consider as a � every cluster <strong>in</strong> the �� (where a<br />

cluster is a connected set of �� crystals with an energy deposit) with a raw (not calibrated) energy greater<br />

than ����Î� . In order to take <strong>in</strong>to account � ’s split <strong>in</strong> two clusters, we use also a list of pseudoclusters<br />

created by every pair of clusters hav<strong>in</strong>g their centroids closer than ÑÖ��. In order to reduce<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>atorics, we loop over charged candidate or neutral cluster lists without consider<strong>in</strong>g tracks (clusters)<br />

with momentum (energy) less than ����� ��� .<br />

A pair of candidate � � (� ¦ ÃË , ÃËÃË ) is accepted when both tracks (track and ÃË , both ÃË )havea<br />

momentum between � and ����Î�1 , when the sum of their momenta (Ô £ � of the � candidate) is <strong>in</strong> the<br />

range – ��� ��Î� , and when the angle � £ between the two tracks (track and à Ë, both à Ë) is such that<br />

Ó× � £ � ��. All quantities (Ô £ and � £ ) are calculated <strong>in</strong> the center-of-mass (CM) rest-frame.<br />

A pair of candidate � ¦ � (� Ã Ë ) is def<strong>in</strong>ed when the sum of the energies of a track and a cluster <strong>in</strong> the CM<br />

rest-frame is between ��� and �����Îand the angle � £ between track direction and cluster centroid is such<br />

that Ó× � £ � ��. A pair of candidate � � is def<strong>in</strong>ed when the sum of the energies of the two clusters <strong>in</strong><br />

the CM rest-frame is between �� and �����Î and the angle � £ between the cluster centroids is such that<br />

Ó× � £ � ��.<br />

1 we use � (� ) mass hypothesis for charged track (neutral cluster)<br />

MARCELLA BONA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!