28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3 Studies on data 91<br />

0.508<br />

0.506<br />

0.504<br />

0.502<br />

0.5<br />

0.498<br />

0.496<br />

0.494<br />

observed Ks candidate masses<br />

0.492<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

flight length (cm)<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Ks reconstruction efficiency<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

MC true flight length (cm)<br />

Figure 3-11. Monte Carlo: Ã Ë <strong>in</strong>variant mass (left) and reconstruction efficiency (right) as function of<br />

decay length from the Monte Carlo truth: the empty dots correspond to block 2 Monte Carlo sample, while<br />

the black po<strong>in</strong>ts are the block 1 Monte Carlo sample.<br />

¯ on-resonance data correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a lum<strong>in</strong>osity of � �� pb and to a number of �� � �� ��� ¦<br />

� ��� giv<strong>in</strong>g an average cross-section of � � ¦ � �(stat) ¦ � � (syst) nb<br />

No further selection is applied apart from the hadronic selection which has been updated with respect to the<br />

Run 1 selection (see Sec. 3.3.1). The new selection consists of:<br />

¯ BGFMultiHadron tag bit set<br />

¯ number of GoodTrackLoose 5 <strong>in</strong> the event �<br />

¯ Ê � ��<br />

¯ the sum of energy of charged tracks plus calorimeter clusters <strong>in</strong> the fiducial region � �����Î<br />

¯ primary vertex with<strong>in</strong> 0.5 cm of beam spot <strong>in</strong> x and y<br />

¯ primary vertex with<strong>in</strong> 6.0 cm of beam spot <strong>in</strong> z.<br />

This results <strong>in</strong> a slightly looser selection with respect to the previous one. This selection is the one used for<br />

B count<strong>in</strong>g analysis: it is described and discussed <strong>in</strong> [45]. A first estimate of the efficiency of this hadronic<br />

selection is shown <strong>in</strong> table 3-4: the Monte Carlo sample used is the Run 1 equivalent one so these are just<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary values to be checked with the appropriate Run 2 Monte Carlo.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> the Run 1 analysis, no other selection is applyed: the number of observed Ã Ë and their average<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant mass are evaluated from a fit to the <strong>in</strong>variant mass plot, us<strong>in</strong>g a double Gaussian with a l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

background. The resolution on the Ã Ë mass is evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle Gaussian and l<strong>in</strong>ear background fit.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>variant mass fit on this Run 2 data sample gives � � ¦ � �(stat) number of reconstructed à Ë<br />

(see Fig. 3-15).<br />

5<br />

GoodTrackLoose def<strong>in</strong>ition: more than 11 drift chamber hits, � with<strong>in</strong> 1.5 cm, Þ with<strong>in</strong> 10 cm and transverse momentum<br />

greater than Å�Î.<br />

Ã Ë RECONSTRUCTION AND EFFICIENCY STUDIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!