28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the �� System<br />

¯ �È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between mix<strong>in</strong>g and decay: it occurs <strong>in</strong> decays <strong>in</strong>to f<strong>in</strong>al states that<br />

are common to � and � . It often occurs <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with the other two types but there are cases<br />

when, to a very good approximation, it is the only effect.<br />

1.3.1 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> Decay<br />

In order to study this type of �È violation, for any f<strong>in</strong>al state �, the quantity � � �<br />

� is def<strong>in</strong>ed s<strong>in</strong>ce it is<br />

��<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent of phase conventions and physically mean<strong>in</strong>gful. There are two types of phases that may<br />

appear <strong>in</strong> the amplitudes: complex parameters <strong>in</strong> any Lagrangian term that contributes to the amplitude<br />

will appear <strong>in</strong> complex conjugate form <strong>in</strong> the �È conjugate amplitude. Therefore these phases appear <strong>in</strong><br />

�� and � with opposite signs. In the Standard Model these phases appear <strong>in</strong> the �ÃÅ matrix and are<br />

�<br />

called weak phases. The weak phase of any s<strong>in</strong>gle term is dependent on the convention, but the difference<br />

between the weak phases <strong>in</strong> two different terms <strong>in</strong> the amplitudes is convention <strong>in</strong>dependent. A second type<br />

of phase can appear even when the Lagrangian is real: such phases come from the possible contribution<br />

from <strong>in</strong>termediate on-shell states dom<strong>in</strong>ated by strong <strong>in</strong>teractions and so they are called strong phases.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce strong <strong>in</strong>teractions conserve �È these phases appear <strong>in</strong> �� and �� with the same sign. Aga<strong>in</strong> only<br />

the relative strong phases of different terms have physical mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Contributions to the amplitudes can be factorized as:<br />

- the magnitude ��;<br />

- the weak phase term � ��� ;<br />

- the strong phase term � �� .<br />

If several amplitudes contribute to � � �, the amplitude �� (see Eq. 1.20) and the �È conjugate amplitude<br />

� � are given by:<br />

�� � �<br />

��� � � �� � �� � � � �� �� �<br />

��� � � �� � (1.35)<br />

�<br />

where �� and �� are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> expressions like 1.17: �È �� � � � ��� �� � and �È � � � � � ��� � � �<br />

(one should consider the complex conjugate of the latter expression � � � �È � � ��� � � �). If � is a �È<br />

eigenstate then � ��� � ¦ be<strong>in</strong>g its �È eigenvalue. The convention-<strong>in</strong>dependent quantity is then<br />

¬<br />

�� ¬ � ¬ � � �� ��<br />

��<br />

¬<br />

¬<br />

È � ��� � Æ� ��<br />

È � ��� � Æ� ��<br />

¬<br />

�<br />

¬ � (1.36)<br />

�È is conserved <strong>in</strong> decays when the magnitude of this ratio is , that means the rate of the decay must be<br />

equal to the rate of the �È conjugate decay. This can happen only if all weak phases �� are the same phase<br />

or if all the strong phases � are the same one. Therefore, from Eq. 1.36 one sees that<br />

MARCELLA BONA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!