Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50 The BABAR Experiment<br />
design value achieved value<br />
HER energy �� ��Î �� ��Î<br />
LER energy � ��Î � ��Î<br />
# of bunches ��� �� � �<br />
bunch spac<strong>in</strong>g �� Ò× �� �� Ò×<br />
positron current � mA � mA<br />
electron current �� mA � � mA<br />
�Ü �Ñ �Ñ<br />
�Ý � �Ñ ��� �Ñ<br />
lum<strong>in</strong>osity � cm s �� cm s<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated day lum<strong>in</strong>osity � pb �� �� pb ��<br />
Table 2-1. Design and achieved mach<strong>in</strong>e parameters.<br />
The beam energies of the two beams are calculated from the total magnetic bend<strong>in</strong>g strength and the average<br />
deviations of the accelerat<strong>in</strong>g frequencies from their central values. The systematic error on the PEP-II<br />
calculation of the absolute beam energies is estimated to be � Å�Î, while the relative energy sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for each beam is accurate and stable to about Å�Î.<br />
Cross sections for the production of fermion pairs at the § �Ë mass energy (which is Ô × � Å § �Ë �<br />
��� ��Î) are shown <strong>in</strong> table 2-2.<br />
� � � cross sections (nb)<br />
�� (� �� ) � �<br />
(� ) �<br />
×× (�××) � �<br />
ÙÙ (�ÙÙ) � �<br />
�� (� �� ) � �<br />
� � (�� ) ���<br />
� � (��) � �<br />
� � (��) � �<br />
Table 2-2. Cross sections � for the production of fermion pairs at the § �Ë mass energy.<br />
BABAR has accumulated ��� fb <strong>in</strong> year 2000 and �� fb <strong>in</strong> 2001 until November: Fig. 2-2 shows the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated lum<strong>in</strong>osity <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 1999, 2000 and 2001 periods and the BABAR efficiency <strong>in</strong> the same periods.<br />
MARCELLA BONA