28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 Strategy and Tools for Charmless Two-body � Decays Analysis<br />

The Poisson factor <strong>in</strong> Eq. 4.6 is the probability of observ<strong>in</strong>g Å total events (the number of events used <strong>in</strong><br />

the fit) when Å are expected. The quantity ÐÓ� Ä is m<strong>in</strong>imized, which is equivalent to maximiz<strong>in</strong>g Ä<br />

itself, with respect to the fit variables.<br />

As a cross-check, a count<strong>in</strong>g analysis is performed: this is very similar to the likelihood one, but differs<br />

<strong>in</strong> its treatment of PID (see Sec. 4.4.2). Standard BABAR particle selector algorithms are used to separate<br />

the selected sample <strong>in</strong>to subsamples which have identified �’s and Ã’s <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al states. A cut is placed<br />

on �. The fit <strong>in</strong>cludes events pass<strong>in</strong>g all cuts except the requirement that the tracks have an associated �<br />

measurement.<br />

A maximum likelihood fit which uses all quantities except � and � is then used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the signal<br />

yields <strong>in</strong> each of the subsamples. These yields are corrected by an efficiency/cross-feed matrix which takes<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account both the selector efficiencies and residual cross feed of the other signal decays <strong>in</strong>to each of the<br />

subsamples. The corrected number of candidates are then normalized to the total efficiency of the selection<br />

cuts and to the total number of �� pairs: the branch<strong>in</strong>g fraction is therefore determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The results from<br />

this analysis are compared with the official results, described above.<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g section, descriptions of the PDFs, as well as the samples used to estimate them, are<br />

presented.<br />

4.6.1 Sample def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

The functional forms of the PDFs of the variables <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the previous section are derived from data<br />

samples that are <strong>in</strong>dependent of the sample used <strong>in</strong> the fit. These <strong>in</strong>clude: off-resonance data, on-resonance<br />

data from ¡� side-bands, control samples of fully reconstructed � � �� decays, control samples of<br />

� � £ � decays and Monte Carlo simulated events. The def<strong>in</strong>itions of the samples used <strong>in</strong> this analysis<br />

are described below, followed by descriptions of how the PDFs used <strong>in</strong> the fit are derived from these samples.<br />

Monte Carlo simulated events<br />

A large sample of Monte Carlo simulated events is used to study both background and signal distributions<br />

and selection efficiencies.<br />

¡� side-band data:<br />

� candidates are selected <strong>in</strong> a ¡� range which is mode dependent. Let’s consider the example of the � �<br />

decay mode <strong>in</strong> which case the range considered is �¡�� � �� ��Î. The ¡� variable is used to subdivide<br />

the data <strong>in</strong>to two samples:<br />

� � � �¡�� � �� ��Î Ë��� ��Ò� (4.10)<br />

� � � ¡� � � � ��Î Ë��Ò�Ð (4.11)<br />

The same can be done <strong>in</strong> each mode. The signal range def<strong>in</strong>es the region <strong>in</strong> which of the signal lies.<br />

The side-band region is used to study characteristics of the background.<br />

MARCELLA BONA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!