28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 Measurement of Branch<strong>in</strong>g Fractions for � ¦ � Ã � ¦ decays<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d good agreement between the SMS selector and the global likelihood fit us<strong>in</strong>g the �ÁÊ� PDF’s.<br />

We have also checked that the asymmetries are compatible with zero <strong>in</strong> the on-resonance upper and lower<br />

side bands, <strong>in</strong> the off-resonance data and <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uum Monte Carlo.<br />

In on-resonance lower side-band, we have 4529 events: fitt<strong>in</strong>g not us<strong>in</strong>g ¡� PDF and fix<strong>in</strong>g the signal<br />

asymmetries, we get<br />

Æ Ë<br />

Ã Ë �<br />

� ��<br />

Æ Ë<br />

Ã Ë Ã �<br />

Æ �<br />

Ã Ë �<br />

Æ �<br />

Ã Ë Ã<br />

� �<br />

Ã Ë �<br />

� �<br />

Ã Ë Ã<br />

���<br />

�� ×Ø�Ø<br />

��<br />

×Ø�Ø<br />

� �� �� ����<br />

��� ×Ø�Ø<br />

� ����� ���<br />

���� ×Ø�Ø<br />

� � ¦ � ×Ø�Ø<br />

� � � ¦ � � ×Ø�Ø<br />

We see no asymmetry <strong>in</strong> the background and no statistically significant signal. To evaluate the cross-feed of<br />

background <strong>in</strong>to signal events, we check on off-resonance data <strong>in</strong> the signal band, us<strong>in</strong>g ¡� PDF too: we<br />

get<br />

Æ Ë<br />

Ã Ë � �<br />

Æ Ë<br />

Ã Ë Ã �<br />

Æ �<br />

Ã Ë �<br />

Æ �<br />

Ã Ë Ã<br />

� �<br />

Ã Ë �<br />

� �<br />

Ã Ë Ã<br />

�<br />

�<br />

� � �<br />

� �<br />

×Ø�Ø<br />

×Ø�Ø<br />

���<br />

��� ×Ø�Ø<br />

���<br />

��� ×Ø�Ø<br />

� � ¦ � �� ×Ø�Ø<br />

� � �� ¦ � �� ×Ø�Ø<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, we have built samples of cont<strong>in</strong>uum Monte Carlo events with different amounts of signal and<br />

background and predef<strong>in</strong>ed asymmetries (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sample different amount of positive and negative<br />

charged candidates) and we have checked that the fit returns the correct yields and asymmetries.<br />

Table 5-6 shows that the fit always returns the correct number of signal events with<strong>in</strong> � and that there is<br />

less than cross-feed to the other Ã Ë � channel or to background events. Table 5-7 shows tests on samples<br />

of cont<strong>in</strong>uum MC with fixed charge asymmetry: the fit returns the value of the asymmetry with very good<br />

agreement.<br />

5.5.4 Systematic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />

The amount of background and signal are both allowed to fluctuate with<strong>in</strong> Poissonian statistics <strong>in</strong> the fit<br />

itself. Thus it is not necessary to estimate a systematic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty from the background normalization. The<br />

MARCELLA BONA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!