Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.4 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Standard Model 27<br />
As shown <strong>in</strong> Eq. 1.33, the value of the time-dependent asymmetry is given by:<br />
���È � ����È� Ó× ¡Ñ�Ø ÁÑ���È<br />
����È� ×�Ò ¡Ñ�Ø<br />
� (1.44)<br />
This asymmetry will be non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g if any of the three types of �È violation are present. In the particular<br />
case of ��È be<strong>in</strong>g the �È eigenstate Â��Ã Ë (the so called golden mode), one can measure �È violation<br />
effect given by ×�Ò ¬. In such decays for which ��� � , the expression 1.33 simplifies considerably:<br />
���È � ÁÑ���È ×�Ò ¡Ñ� Ø (1.45)<br />
with no hadronic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties from the strong <strong>in</strong>teractions. In case no �È violation <strong>in</strong> decay is present,<br />
�È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between mix<strong>in</strong>g and decay can be cleanly related to CKM parameters: <strong>in</strong><br />
particular, if decays are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by a s<strong>in</strong>gle �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g phase, ���È is cleanly translated <strong>in</strong>to a value<br />
for ÁÑ�(see Eq. 1.45) which, <strong>in</strong> this case, is easily <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> terms of purely electroweak Lagrangian<br />
parameters.<br />
On the other hand, when �È violation <strong>in</strong> decay is present, the asymmetry <strong>in</strong> 1.43 depends also on the ratio<br />
of the different amplitudes and their relative strong phases, and thus the result is not cleanly <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />
because of the hadronic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties. In some cases, however, it is possible to remove any large hadronic<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties by measur<strong>in</strong>g several isosp<strong>in</strong>-related rates and extract a clean measurement of �ÃÅ phases<br />
(this is the case of two pion decays, see Sec. 1.5.2).<br />
There are also many f<strong>in</strong>al states for � decay that have �È self-conjugate particle content but are not �È<br />
eigenstates because they conta<strong>in</strong> admixtures of different angular momenta and hence different parities. In<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> cases angular analyses of the f<strong>in</strong>al state can be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the amplitudes for each different<br />
�È contribution separately (this is the case of � � Â��à £ decays [24]).<br />
1.4 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Standard Model<br />
1.4.1 The �ÃÅ Picture of �È <strong>Violation</strong><br />
The Standard Model [19] is the theory describ<strong>in</strong>g the electromagnetic, weak and strong <strong>in</strong>teractions. It is<br />
based on a ËÍ � ¢ ËÍ Ä ¢ Í � gauge symmetry with three fermion generations. �È violation is<br />
accommodated <strong>in</strong> this model through a phase <strong>in</strong> the mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix for quarks [3]. Each quark generation<br />
consists of three multiplets:<br />
É Á Ä �<br />
� Á �<br />
ÍÄ � � ��� Ù Á Ê � � � � � Á Ê � � � �<br />
� Á Ä<br />
�È VIOLATION IN THE �� SYSTEM