28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.4 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Standard Model 27<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong> Eq. 1.33, the value of the time-dependent asymmetry is given by:<br />

���È � ����È� Ó× ¡Ñ�Ø ÁÑ���È<br />

����È� ×�Ò ¡Ñ�Ø<br />

� (1.44)<br />

This asymmetry will be non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g if any of the three types of �È violation are present. In the particular<br />

case of ��È be<strong>in</strong>g the �È eigenstate Â��Ã Ë (the so called golden mode), one can measure �È violation<br />

effect given by ×�Ò ¬. In such decays for which ��� � , the expression 1.33 simplifies considerably:<br />

���È � ÁÑ���È ×�Ò ¡Ñ� Ø (1.45)<br />

with no hadronic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties from the strong <strong>in</strong>teractions. In case no �È violation <strong>in</strong> decay is present,<br />

�È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between mix<strong>in</strong>g and decay can be cleanly related to CKM parameters: <strong>in</strong><br />

particular, if decays are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by a s<strong>in</strong>gle �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g phase, ���È is cleanly translated <strong>in</strong>to a value<br />

for ÁÑ�(see Eq. 1.45) which, <strong>in</strong> this case, is easily <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> terms of purely electroweak Lagrangian<br />

parameters.<br />

On the other hand, when �È violation <strong>in</strong> decay is present, the asymmetry <strong>in</strong> 1.43 depends also on the ratio<br />

of the different amplitudes and their relative strong phases, and thus the result is not cleanly <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

because of the hadronic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties. In some cases, however, it is possible to remove any large hadronic<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties by measur<strong>in</strong>g several isosp<strong>in</strong>-related rates and extract a clean measurement of �ÃÅ phases<br />

(this is the case of two pion decays, see Sec. 1.5.2).<br />

There are also many f<strong>in</strong>al states for � decay that have �È self-conjugate particle content but are not �È<br />

eigenstates because they conta<strong>in</strong> admixtures of different angular momenta and hence different parities. In<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> cases angular analyses of the f<strong>in</strong>al state can be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the amplitudes for each different<br />

�È contribution separately (this is the case of � � Â��à £ decays [24]).<br />

1.4 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Standard Model<br />

1.4.1 The �ÃÅ Picture of �È <strong>Violation</strong><br />

The Standard Model [19] is the theory describ<strong>in</strong>g the electromagnetic, weak and strong <strong>in</strong>teractions. It is<br />

based on a ËÍ � ¢ ËÍ Ä ¢ Í � gauge symmetry with three fermion generations. �È violation is<br />

accommodated <strong>in</strong> this model through a phase <strong>in</strong> the mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix for quarks [3]. Each quark generation<br />

consists of three multiplets:<br />

É Á Ä �<br />

� Á �<br />

ÍÄ � � ��� Ù Á Ê � � � � � Á Ê � � � �<br />

� Á Ä<br />

�È VIOLATION IN THE �� SYSTEM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!