28.12.2012 Views

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

Violation in Mixing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the �� System<br />

where ¦ depends on the eigenstate ���È .<br />

� �� ¦ � �È Ú�ÓÐ�Ø�ÓÒ� (1.42)<br />

Both �È violation <strong>in</strong> decays (1.37) and �È violation <strong>in</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g (1.39) lead to the condition 1.42 through<br />

��� �� . But even <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>in</strong> which, to a good approximation, ��� � and ����� � , yet there can be<br />

�È violation if:<br />

��� � � ÁÑ��� �<br />

This type of �È violation is called �È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between decays with and without mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or more briefly “<strong>in</strong>terference between mix<strong>in</strong>g and decay”. This type of �È violation has also been observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the neutral kaon system.<br />

Figure 1-3. �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g asymmetries result from <strong>in</strong>terference effects <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g phases that change sigh<br />

under the �È operator. The weak phase of the �ÃÅ matrix has this property. One way to observe �È<br />

violation is to use the <strong>in</strong>terference between the direct decay � � ��È and the process � � � � ��È :<br />

the Standard Model predicts substantial asymmetries between this process and the one <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

meson is a � .<br />

For the neutral � system, �È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between decays with and without mix<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />

observed by compar<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

- direct decays � � �, where � is a f<strong>in</strong>al state accessible <strong>in</strong> both � and � decays;<br />

- � � � mix<strong>in</strong>g followed by the � � � decay.<br />

The state � can be a �È eigenstate, but that’s not a necessary condition. From the analysis proposed <strong>in</strong><br />

Sec. 1.2.6, one gets:<br />

MARCELLA BONA<br />

���È � � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È<br />

� Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È<br />

� (1.43)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!