Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Violation in Mixing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
26 �È <strong>Violation</strong> <strong>in</strong> the �� System<br />
where ¦ depends on the eigenstate ���È .<br />
� �� ¦ � �È Ú�ÓÐ�Ø�ÓÒ� (1.42)<br />
Both �È violation <strong>in</strong> decays (1.37) and �È violation <strong>in</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g (1.39) lead to the condition 1.42 through<br />
��� �� . But even <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>in</strong> which, to a good approximation, ��� � and ����� � , yet there can be<br />
�È violation if:<br />
��� � � ÁÑ��� �<br />
This type of �È violation is called �È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between decays with and without mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
or more briefly “<strong>in</strong>terference between mix<strong>in</strong>g and decay”. This type of �È violation has also been observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> the neutral kaon system.<br />
Figure 1-3. �È -violat<strong>in</strong>g asymmetries result from <strong>in</strong>terference effects <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g phases that change sigh<br />
under the �È operator. The weak phase of the �ÃÅ matrix has this property. One way to observe �È<br />
violation is to use the <strong>in</strong>terference between the direct decay � � ��È and the process � � � � ��È :<br />
the Standard Model predicts substantial asymmetries between this process and the one <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
meson is a � .<br />
For the neutral � system, �È violation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terference between decays with and without mix<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />
observed by compar<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
- direct decays � � �, where � is a f<strong>in</strong>al state accessible <strong>in</strong> both � and � decays;<br />
- � � � mix<strong>in</strong>g followed by the � � � decay.<br />
The state � can be a �È eigenstate, but that’s not a necessary condition. From the analysis proposed <strong>in</strong><br />
Sec. 1.2.6, one gets:<br />
MARCELLA BONA<br />
���È � � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È<br />
� Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È � Ô�Ý× Ø � ��È<br />
� (1.43)