06.01.2013 Views

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Potential</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Products<br />

provals have become an increasingly significant part of the total product development and commercialization<br />

equation. Regulators and the scientists who support them must take care to assure<br />

that data requirements are reasonable and designed to address true food, feed, and environmental<br />

risks.<br />

Global Status and Trends of Commercialized <strong>Biotechnology</strong> in Crops<br />

Commercial crop biotechnology products consist of different crop varieties possessing specific<br />

traits in any of four food, feed, and fiber crops, namely soybean, maize (corn), canola, and<br />

cotton. In 2004, the global area grown with biotech crops was estimated at 81 million ha, made<br />

up primarily of soybean, maize, cotton, and canola. Biotech soybean retained its position in 2004<br />

as the biotech crop occupying the largest area, 48.4 million ha in 2004, with biotech maize in<br />

second place at 19.3 million ha, biotech cotton in third place at 9.0 million ha, and finally canola<br />

at 4.3 million ha. Between 1996 and 2003, a total of 21 countries, 11 developing and 10 industrial<br />

countries, contributed to a 40-fold increase in the global area of biotech crops, from 1.7<br />

million ha in 1996 to 67.7 million ha in 2003. Adoption rates <strong>for</strong> biotech crops during this period<br />

have been unprecedented, and by recent agricultural industry standards they are the highest<br />

adoption rates <strong>for</strong> improved crops, reflecting farmer satisfaction with products that offer substantial<br />

benefits, including more convenient and flexible crop management, higher productivity<br />

and/or net returns per hectare, health and social benefits, and a cleaner environment through decreased<br />

use of conventional pesticides, which collectively contribute to a more sustainable agriculture.<br />

There is a growing body of consistent and compelling evidence generated by public sector<br />

institutions that clearly demonstrates the improved weed and insect pest control attainable<br />

with biotech herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant Bt crops that also benefit from lower input<br />

and production costs. Biotech crops offer substantial economic advantages to farmers compared<br />

with corresponding conventional crops.<br />

During the nine-year period 1996 to 2004, herbicide tolerance has consistently been the<br />

dominant trait, with insect resistance second. In 2004, herbicide tolerance, deployed in soybean,<br />

maize, canola, and cotton, occupied 72% of the 81.0 million ha. There were 15.6 million ha<br />

planted to Bt crops, equivalent to 19%, with stacked genes <strong>for</strong> herbicide tolerance and insect resistance<br />

deployed in both cotton and maize occupying 9% of the global biotech area in 2004.<br />

The increase in Bt crops reflects the significant increase in Bt maize in 2004 (2.0 million ha) and<br />

the increase of Bt cotton (1.4 million ha) in China, India, and Australia. Whereas most of the<br />

growth in Bt maize occurred in the U.S., there were also significant increases in Bt maize area in<br />

Argentina, Canada, South Africa, Spain, and the Philippines. The stacked traits of herbicide<br />

tolerance and insect resistance in both maize and cotton increased by 17% in 2004, reflecting the<br />

needs of farmers who must simultaneously address the multiple yield constraints associated with<br />

various biotic stresses. Although the substantial share (66%) of biotech crops was grown in industrial<br />

countries, the proportion of biotech crops grown in developing countries has increased<br />

consistently every year, from 14% in 1997 to 16% in 1998, 18% in 1999, 24% in 2000, 26% in<br />

2001, 27% in 2002, 30% in 2003, and 34% in 2004. Thus, in 2004, more than one-third of the<br />

global biotech crop area of 81.0 million ha, equivalent to 27.6 million ha, was grown in developing<br />

countries. For the first time the absolute growth in the biotech crop area between 2003 and<br />

2004 was higher in developing countries (7.2 million ha) than in industrial countries (6.1 million<br />

ha). Also, the percentage growth was almost three times as high (35%) in the developing countries<br />

of the South compared to the industrial countries of the North (13%).<br />

Seventeen countries grew biotech crops in 2004, 11 developing countries and 6 industrial<br />

countries, including Romania from Eastern Europe. In 2004, biotech crops were grown commercially<br />

in all six continents of the world: North America, Latin America, Asia, Oceania, Europe<br />

(Eastern and Western), and Africa. The top eight countries, each growing half a million ha or<br />

more of biotech crops in 2004, are the U.S., Argentina, Canada, Brazil, China, Paraguay, India,<br />

and South Africa. These top eight biotech countries accounted <strong>for</strong> approximately 99% of the<br />

– 4 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!