06.01.2013 Views

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Potential</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Products<br />

REGULATORY MECHANISMS<br />

It is important that biotechnology be used <strong>for</strong> the social benefit of India and <strong>for</strong> economic<br />

development. To fulfill this vision, research and application in biotechnology must be guided by<br />

a process of decision-making that safeguards both human health and the environment with adherence<br />

to the highest ethical standards. There is consensus that existing legislation, backed by<br />

science-based assessment procedures, clearly articulates rules and regulations that can efficiently<br />

fulfill this vision.<br />

Choices must be made that reflect an adequate balance between benefit, safety, access, and<br />

the interest of consumers and farmers. It is also important that biotechnology products required<br />

<strong>for</strong> social and economic good are produced speedily and at the lowest cost. A scientific, rigorous,<br />

transparent, efficient, predictable, and consistent regulatory mechanism <strong>for</strong> biosafety evaluation<br />

and release system/protocol is an essential ingredient <strong>for</strong> achieving these multiple goals.<br />

Strategic Actions<br />

The recommendation of the Swaminathan Committee on the regulation of agri-biotech<br />

products and of the Mashelkar committee on recombinant pharma products will be implemented<br />

in 2005.<br />

It is recommended that an event that has already undergone extensive biosafety tests should<br />

not be treated as a new event if it is in a changed background containing the tested and biosafety<br />

evaluated “event.” Where adequate evidence is available that the recurrent parent genetic background<br />

of a notified/registered genotype is nearly restored (through field data/molecular data),<br />

only the agronomic per<strong>for</strong>mance and the level and stability of the transgene expression may be<br />

analyzed by two-year trial data by the ICAR. Even in the case of a structurally altered transgene<br />

with no significant modifications in protein con<strong>for</strong>mation, the toxicity and allergenicity tests<br />

need not be carried out provided the predicted antigenic epitope remains the same and the level<br />

of expression of the transgene is within the defined limits. For the released event, the Department<br />

is of the view that there is no need <strong>for</strong> large-scale trials under the Genetic Engineering<br />

Approval Committee, as the biosafety aspects have been already addressed adequately be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

releasing the “event.” Only ICAR trials may address the agronomic evaluation of the crop.<br />

An interministerial group chaired by a reputed scientist will be established in 2005 to address<br />

anomalies in regulations and issues that arise from time to time. It is proposed that the administrative<br />

support given to this committee be through the Department of <strong>Biotechnology</strong>. The<br />

mandate of the committee should be to vet any changes in policies, procedures, and protocols by<br />

departments dealing with regulations in biotech products and processes, resolve issues emanating<br />

from the overlapping/conflicting rules in various acts related to regulation of biotechnology<br />

activities in R&D, import, export, releases, etc., and to review guidelines, protocols, and standard<br />

operating procedures and ensure their dissemination to all stakeholders from time to time<br />

A competent single National <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Regulatory Authority is to be established with<br />

separate divisions <strong>for</strong> agriculture products/transgenic crops, pharmaceuticals/drugs and industrial<br />

products, and transgenic food/feed and transgenic animal/aqua culture. The Authority is to be<br />

governed by an independent administrative structure with a common chairman. The interministerial<br />

group will develop suitable proposals <strong>for</strong> the consideration of the government.<br />

A center <strong>for</strong> in-service training of all professionals, irrespective of their location, engaged<br />

in the regulatory process is to be established by the Department of <strong>Biotechnology</strong> in close collaboration<br />

with other concerned departments and institutions.<br />

All existing guidelines are to be updated in 2005 and made consistent with the recommendations<br />

of the Swaminathan and Mashelkar committees. New guidelines on transgenic research<br />

and product/process development in animal, aqua culture, food, phyto-pharma, and environmental<br />

applications are to be put in place in 2005 by the concerned ministries/departments.<br />

– 108 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!