Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
Business Potential for Agricultural Biotechnology - Asian Productivity ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Potential</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong> Products<br />
Public Acceptance<br />
Public acceptance of modern biotechnology was clearly attained last year when the Philippines<br />
joined <strong>for</strong> the first time the mega-country group producing agricultural biotech products.<br />
The Philippines now ranks 14 among mega-countries producing agricultural biotech products<br />
(Table 3). This was made possible by the contributions of the various advocates <strong>for</strong> modern biotechnology<br />
and the growing policy support provided by the government. The advocacy activities<br />
paved the way <strong>for</strong> a more open and transparent dialogue among key stakeholders—government,<br />
the private sector, academia, NGOs, and farmers. It also blocked the passage of bills and resolutions<br />
in Congress attempting to impose a moratorium on activities related to biotechnology and<br />
GMOs. Particularly in 2000, during the height of anti-biotech sentiments, Senate Report No. 397<br />
recommended that the proposed moratorium on activities related to biotechnology and GMOs<br />
would in effect stifle the impetus of human innovation and inventiveness and exclude the Philippines<br />
from the tide of technological advances now prevalent elsewhere in the world.<br />
Table 3. Mega-countries Producing <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Biotechnology</strong><br />
(Bt corn) Products<br />
Country Million hectares<br />
(planted to Bt corn)<br />
Percent<br />
USA 47.6 59<br />
Argentina 16.2 20<br />
Canada 5.4 6<br />
Brazil 5.0 6<br />
China 3.7 5<br />
Paraguay 1.2 5<br />
India 0.5 1<br />
South Africa 0.5 1<br />
Uruguay 0.3 less than 1<br />
Australia 0.2 less than 1<br />
Romania 0.1 less than 1<br />
Mexico 0.1 less than 1<br />
Spain 0.1 less than 1<br />
Philippines 0.1 less than 1<br />
Source: Philippines Today, 2005<br />
Among the different actors who played major roles in biotechnology advocacy were, in no<br />
particular order, the various professional groups and nongovernment organizations, such as the<br />
<strong>Biotechnology</strong> Coalition of the Philippines and the Philippine Maize Farmers Association,<br />
private companies like Monsanto Philippines and Pioneer-Dupont, regional and international organizations<br />
like the Southeast Asia Regional Center <strong>for</strong> Agriculture-<strong>Biotechnology</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Center and the International Service <strong>for</strong> the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, public<br />
research institutions such as the University of the Philippines National Institute of Molecular<br />
Biology and <strong>Biotechnology</strong> and Institute of Plant Breeding, and government departments such as<br />
the DOST–National Academy of Science and Technology and the Philippine Council <strong>for</strong><br />
Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research and Development (PCARRD) as well as<br />
the Department of Agriculture DA–<strong>Biotechnology</strong> Implementation Unit<br />
Policy Support<br />
The key government policy support that set the stage <strong>for</strong> the application of modern biotechnology<br />
was direct funding support <strong>for</strong> R&D and capability building. Five projects in genetic engineering<br />
were approved by <strong>for</strong>mer President Fidel V. Ramos in 1997. From 1998 to 2002, a<br />
– 152 –